Seeking Alpha
About this author:





At some point, this stock market is going to overshoot to the downside, just as it overshot to the upside, and there will be tremendous money to be made. Of course, everyone wants to catch the bottom, so that creates violent rallies when it seems as though we've made a low and equally violent reversals when those hopes are dashed.

A look at some recent large market declines -- 1970, 1974, 1987, and 2002/2003 (charts above) -- suggests that market bottoms following major drops tend to be complex affairs. Sometimes, as in 1970 and 1987, you get a washout selloff that marks intraday lows for the bear move, followed by retests that hold above that intraday low. Other times, as in 1974 and 2002/2003, you get the classic pattern of a momentum low (the point at which the number of stocks making fresh annual new lows hits a peak) followed by subsequent price lows on lower momentum (and fewer new lows).

Note how, in the charts above, there tend to be substantial rallies and sizable selloffs even after price lows have been made. This volatile choppiness makes it difficult for traders and investors to hold positions with conviction.

It is this tendency toward complex bottoms that means that investors can find good points for entry even after ultimate lows have been made. Indeed, traders who were too eager to catch market bottoms in early May, 1970; September, 1974; early October, 1987; and July, 2002 found themselves facing significant further declines. We really only know when we've made a low when we're able to assess subsequent buying interest after price and momentum lows have been made. That often means missing exact price lows, but it also avoids the discomfort of catching those proverbial falling knives.
.

Print this article with comments

This article has 30 comments:

  •  
    The author makes a good point.

    Personally I am not trying to 'catch the bottom'. I wish to catch the gains during the next bull market and avoid the losses of the current bear market. There is a significant difference.

    Patience pays.
    2008 Oct 17 11:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Smarty_Pants has a good strategy. Brett has issued a timely warning about being too early illustrating the point with the previous bear markets.
    2008 Oct 17 12:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So in other words, you are going to buy AFTER the stock market has rallied. Yeah, okay. Why buy low when you can buy high, right? Duh.
    2008 Oct 17 12:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If you ALWAYS sell when a strong stock pulls back 5 to 10%(no more ever) from its high you will always protect your profits. Never buy low like all the "advisors" say to do; buy only when a stock shows high volume up-signs of big gains coming, like HANS, AAPL, RIMM, GOOG, etc. Forget the others. Long term buy and hold is dead. Diversifying for safety only guarantees mediocrity or worse.

    Low online commissions are cheap profit insurance. All my trades this year cost me half of what I lost the last day I held AAPL, but I sold it at 180 so I'm not complaining.
    2008 Oct 17 12:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    drip feed it...average out...
    2008 Oct 17 12:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    user 278265,

    God forbid you miss the "real low." What about all the 1,000 percent gainers like Apple and RIM that came after the low? Or MCF that came years after "the low?" Or POT and ISRG? Trying to catch the low is a loser's game. The biggest winners show up in bull markets and this market has no leadership right now. Preserving cash and waiting for a better environment with leading stocks is a winning strategy.
    2008 Oct 17 12:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So you plan to buy back in AFTER a huge rally, right? Duh. You are suggesting buying high.
    2008 Oct 17 12:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'll tell you what, I'll go to a store today and buy a loaf of bread for $2. Then you can buy it from me for $5. Based on your strategy, you should be happy with my offer.
    2008 Oct 17 12:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  

    Why should I care what happens to stocks a month or three after I buy them? I'm not going to sell. In ten years there is a slight chance. The only point of timing is to get more shares for the buck. Let clueless leverage speculators worry about every buck and squiggle; if you are investing your own money, just buy after all large pullbacks and never sell until you've at least doubled your money. The whole point of using your own money is you can hold as long as that takes, and longer if you want.
    2008 Oct 17 01:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Right on!, brother.

    Just a little '70's-style support for ya!
    2008 Oct 17 01:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Just like the irony of people living twice as long as they did 100 years ago but are buying wine today that is made to drink tonight as opposed to the days 100 years ago when people lived much shorter lives and bought wine to age and drink in 20 years.( Love those ironies of life)

    What is the guarantee you will be around when all your stocks pay off after a lifetime of buy and hold? Why not try to find a way to have them pay off earlier and better?
    2008 Oct 17 01:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The real lesson is that buy and hold is not a strategy that is going to work. You buy in increments, and sell when you achieve reasonable gains -- to hang on past that increases your chances of losing, as seen by the fact we are now flat over the past 10 years. If the S&P averages a 10-12% return, and I'm up that much, I'm gonna start scaling out -- again, not all at once...but that is the clue that it's time.

    As for calling a bottom and when to buy, again, buy incrementally. To be in cash right now would have been good...but at these valuations, *some* increment should be going into the market right now! Save some for the next decline. If we start having lower lows and higher highs...then you can feel better about putting more increments on. But you never go all in. Leave 20% even if you think it's all up from here.
    2008 Oct 17 01:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To predict and call the 'low' would be unprecedented in and of itself.
    If anyone has or could now... we would already know their names!

    while some may have the audacity to call it from their apartment in Boston, do they have skin in the game?

    *The better opportunity is that apple is $90/share or (insert your company here) and what we have is companies with a solid footing and future and a +30% discount.

    find our gems, buy and hold... if you have the luxury as I do..
    I have 30 years left to watch these babies bloom!

    for those with that kind of time... this is a bargain
    2008 Oct 17 01:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    does it matter if you catch the bottom looking at the charts? No . Everybody thinks this market has 1 or 2 more tanking sessions in it before we hit bottom - the govt bailouts havent been tested yet -in other words nothing has happened where anything they have done is going to work - this may sound crazy but you need a big bearish event here and the financials are left standing -that I think will instill confidence in the market -other than that a long bumpy volatile ride -
    but if you look at your charts if you were to invest exactly 2 months after the initial extremly large move down - you would always catch the wave up
    2008 Oct 17 02:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    When we have hit a low we shall be up. This means do not try to catch lows and bottoms, trade with the trend up or down. When the market is up trade bullish when the market is down sell and sell some more.
    2008 Oct 17 02:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    so 2 months from oct 14-
    2008 Oct 17 02:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    that would be a buy and hold strategy - and a very large bottle of pepto
    2008 Oct 17 02:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A low? Don't we have a Depression and a World War to go through first? Also, the return of hats, both men's and women's. And maybe buggy whips since Smarty is smart.

    Brought to you by the government backed fractional reserve banking cartel.
    2008 Oct 17 02:56 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Those waiting for "The Bottom" will have to wake up at some point and realize we've already passed it last Friday, October 10, at 2pm ET. But to vindicate their failure to act, they'll say they are 'waiting for a pullback'. When the masses finally start getting back into the market in droves, you'll know we are near the top.
    2008 Oct 17 03:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think the lows of the 10th were succesfullyt tested. i moved a third of my cash in my 401k to stocks funds (except commodities). I think that we are closer to the bottom that to the top. My mental stop is the lows of the 10th on a closing basis. I also bought a covered call on ford today at the open with the intent to keep it for as long as possible or until it breaks the low of 1.88. The risk/reward was too high to pass. The premium a received for the call was more than 10% of the price of Ford at the open. I think is a win win. If I am wrong, I am wrong small.
    2008 Oct 17 03:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    'The World's Worst Stock Picker',

    You may call yourself The World's Worst Stock Picker, but you sound smarter than many here. Your entry point and stop strategy sound well thought and I believe will prove to be right on the money.

    I'm not sure what you mean by 'bought a covered call'. Do you mean you _wrote_ a covered call on Ford? If you received the premium, that means you sold the Call, not bought it. And who is the other 'win' in the 'win win' you mention?
    2008 Oct 17 03:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    How about this one Brett - Will we have ANY MORE DOUGH when we've made a LOW?

    I have a newfound respect for the stock market as an alternative type of gambling !
    2008 Oct 17 03:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I hope the bottom-picking, buy-&-holding folks didn't start with Nortel Networks back in 2005 when it dropped to around 120. It currently sits around 1.625. You've got a lot of holding to do before you break even.

    If you are going to buy now, best to have some predetermined point at which you accept that the bottom isn't in should that be the case. World's Worst has the right idea. Low risk. Conserve capital.

    As for skin in the game, here's my actual history with actual money:

    I sold everything between August and November 2007. I bought QID (inverse of QQQQ) in November of 2007 and swapped between that and cash until just before Fannie and Freddie were nationalized. I made good profits and left a lot more on the table for fear that government interference would make equity markets too unstable to trade (as has proven to be the case).

    I have also been in and out of GLD options with good profits as well. In the last week I have captured enough profit to pay my necessary expenses for many months (oddly enough by hedging my long GLD position during the drop).

    For 2008 I have more than doubled my initial brokerage account balance and I still hold a long position on GLD options which might make even more. Most of that time I sat in cash, only taking positions when I felt the odds were very much in my favor. I was fortunate to do so well, but I never felt that I was risking a big loss in the effort. I don't think I was ever down by more than 10% from the balance at the beginning of the year.

    Please don't ask me "how I did it" because there are many factors I consider. I've been doing this for many years, seen a lot of things, and made a whole lot of mistakes on the way.

    Based on my experience I'm not willing to say the bottom is in yet. The current trend is down. Until I see that change, I expect more of the same. As long as Paulson's boyz are changing the rules regularly I don't expect the market to get it's feet under it for a sustainable rally.

    Maybe I'm wrong. If so, then I'll be looking to buy when the trend turns up. Since I avoided big losses on the way down, I can afford to wait on the way up.

    Better to avoid a loss and capture a surer gain than to gamble that you got in at the lowest price and risk losing because you misjudged.

    Basically the lesson I've learned is to be very careful risking your money unless you are nearly certain that you will do well. I don't see that in today's market, so I trade in spots where I believe I can make some good gains and then get out to wait for the next spot.

    It works for me, but it may not be a suitable style for others.
    2008 Oct 17 03:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Smarty_Pants, In 2005 Nortel traded between $25 and $40, adjusted for the 1:10 reverse split. You must be thinking of 2000, when it was trading at $120 _unadjusted_, or $1200 adjusted for the reverse split.

    Based on standard valuation metrics, Nortel wasn't worth $1200 in 2000, $25 in 2005, or even $1.60 now.
    2008 Oct 17 05:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    we may or may not have passed a bottom. we have not however passed this crisis or even begin to feel the effect of this recession. there is not one person i have heard saying this market will take off in the next 18 months. all arguments foretell long term gains. this is a time to watch as we really do not know how these many factors will play out.
    2008 Oct 17 08:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  

    99.99 % will lose money trying to buy the bottom, 01% will get it right.

    ..but there are fools born every new low. ;)
    2008 Oct 18 09:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "We really only know when we've made a low when we're able to assess subsequent buying interest after price and momentum lows have been made. That often means missing exact price lows, but it also avoids the discomfort of catching those proverbial falling knives..."

    doesn't that simply mean "someone will find the low. Just not you."?
    2008 Oct 18 10:14 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What are you sharing that we do not already know?
    2008 Oct 18 11:25 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Knowing precisely when to sell is one of the most difficult decisions to be made in investing. I suspect, flipping a coin will provide as good success as any derived by following a sophisticated system.
    2008 Oct 18 09:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If the government would OUTLAW SHORT SELLING of stocks we would have far less radical swings in the market and much less over-selling. Short sellers have been DESTROYING THE VALUE of peoples retirement savings. SHORT SELLERS MUST BE STOPPED. The 401(k) plans of millions of people are being ravaged by short sellers.
    2008 Oct 20 04:56 PM | Link | Reply
More by Brett Steenbarger
Other articles by Brett Steenbarger »