Seeking Alpha
About this author:

While many financial journalists and bloggers seem to think the sky is falling (or, has fallen and will fall much further), Barron's isn't buying it:

The economy has often proved more resilient than is commonly thought - and constructive factors that have gotten scant attention should help the U.S. skirt a deep recession. In fact, it's possible that the downturn could prove to be one of the briefest and mildest on record.

What constructive factors, you ask?

Number one, the huge boost to consumer spending that will come from a decline in energy costs. While oil's run-up to $150/barrel was front and center, its equally dramatic plunge back to $70 has garnered scant media coverage. Natural gas is also off about 50% since early July.

$80 crude produces an 'energy dividend' of about $170B, which Barron's author Gene Epstein assumes will make its way back into the economy during Q4 and Q1 2009, boosting consumer spending - which accounts for 70% of U.S. GDP - by 3.5%.

But most of that, he concedes, will be counteracted by shrinking credit markets and eroded home values.

So add to the mixture labor income growth. Spurred by relatively healthy unemployment (6.2% is still historically low), and falling food and energy prices which could produce a temporarily negative CPI, real wages should increase, leading to real consumer spending growth of 0.9% in Q4 and 1.5% in Q1 - enough to push waning GDP growth back into positive territory. The potential of looser credit markets, renewed growth in largely stagnant capital investment, and depleted inventories should further fuel growth.

If I'm right, then, the only quarter of contraction this time around (barring revisions) will have been 2007's fourth, in which GDP fell at an annualized 0.2%. The economy won't be great through the end of 2009, but it should do far better than the gloom-mongers expect.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

  • A Sunday article in the NY Daily News notes that consumers waiting for oil prices to drop with the same magnitude they rose may be disappointed: "Much of the crude oil price increases could not be passed on at the pump," EIA oil analyst Douglas MacIntyre notes, so gas prices simply don't have that far to fall.
  • Menzie Chinn notes a forecast released Friday night by Deutsche Bank gives a sobering new view of economic growth over the short- to medium-term, much worse than it thought just two weeks previously.
  • Peter Schiff's outlook is almost diametrically opposed to Barron's'. "The structure of the U.S economy today is far weaker than it was in the fall of 1929," he writes. "Years of reckless consumer borrowing and spending, and enormous trade and budget deficits have resulted in a hollowed out industrial base and an unmanageable mountain of debt owed to foreign creditors... This will not be your grandfather's Depression. It may be much worse."
Print this article with comments

This article has 25 comments:

  •  
    This is sort of the Barrons' version of Don Luskin's WashPost Sep 14th op-ed piece, just before the market collapsed.

    I'm seeing a lot of people losing their jobs, store fronts closing, and real estate prices sinking, and I live in an area (Boston) that supposedly hasn't been hit as hard as many.

    Sure, the market can do anything, particular with the likelihood of a few TRILLION dollars of stimulus. But arguing that things aren't that bad in the face of debt deflation of epic proportions seems shallow. Of course, maybe we should put Mr. Happy Face on after a 40 percent SPX drop...unless the monthly charts put us where no man has gone before.
    2008 Oct 19 04:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey, the unemployment statistics and the "CPI" numbers are FAKE. These criminals lied about WMD to cause a war and killed thousands as a result, you don't think the same scum haven't been faking their economic stats for decades? These are the same lying thieves who have stolen trillions of dollars on the real estate bubble, war profiteering, and strongarm blackmail banking bailouts.

    Basing economic analysis on government statistics is like trusting a mafia-operated slot machine. Actually, the mafia probably has a more reliable code of ethics.
    2008 Oct 19 06:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good to see some optimism. I agree, the sky will not fall and all will be well in several years.

    However, I still suspect a long recession to rebalance the misallocations of capital and labor brought about by a policy, sustained for over a decade, that diverted excessive resources towards the housing and finance sectors; at the expense of other sectors, especially the manufacturing sector.

    There is bound to be a painful transition as the economy rebalances, and this will involve destruction of many of the current business models and profit-making patterns, with consequent losses in the stock market. Thus, I doubt that stocks have bottomed yet, except perhaps for a short period.

    2008 Oct 19 06:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think rational people have pretty much ruled out the '29 end of the world scenario. It should be pretty clear by now that the governments of the world are willing do whatever it takes to prevent that. That means realistically we are dealing with a recession. We have had recessions before and we will have them again. We have always recovered. History proves that.

    I agree that the gas price drop will be a boon for the consumer. It comes at just the right time of the year for the retailers. The holidays...the time of the year they go into the black.

    The stock market behavior appears to be more liquidation driven than value or economy driven. That may be due to a confluence of factors such as hedge fund redemption selling, margin call forced liquidation selling, financials raising cash by selling equities, baby boomers that don't have the time to do it again and the fear mongers benefitting from short selling The current P/E of the S&P is around 13.5 against a 30 year average of 18. To me that says that the sell off was most certainly not value or economy driven but driven by the need to raise cash. The last time the P/E was at this level was 1988. The market returned to more traditional value 2 years later.

    I don't think it is polyanna to be optimistic about the future. History is on my side.

    I shopping for some stocks. They're still on sale this week.
    2008 Oct 19 08:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    << $80 crude produces an 'energy dividend' of about $170B >>

    No, it doesn't. The $170B spent somewhere else. How is that a benefit?

    It isn't.
    2008 Oct 19 09:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    History will repeat itself until it doesn't.
    2008 Oct 19 09:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Re: "In fact, it's possible that the downturn could prove to be one of the briefest and mildest on record."

    I've got news for the Barron's writer... The downturn has already long-passed the point where it could be considered "mild," let alone "one of the mildest on record" The people who believe this sophomoric analysis will be doomed to imprudent investment decisions which will undoubtedly separate them from their remaining assets.
    2008 Oct 19 10:27 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I hope that nobody relies solely on Barron's for their information. Apparently their writers are chugging the Government Kool-Aid.

    We're in this mess because of easy money and world Governments are attempting to cure the problem with more of what caused it? The cure is the disease? I thought that only worked for vaccinations. Too late for that though.
    2008 Oct 19 10:48 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    who has any fr**kin money left to spend?? everyone's taken a major hosing
    2008 Oct 19 10:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oh , I forgot , OPEC just announced Friday that " it needs cude at 70-90 / barrel " for them to continue their massive infrastructure spending " , . they also announced they will be cutting crude production 1.5-2 million / barrels per day ! Don't you realize crude prices always go down prior to the election + skyrocket past ? Check this out ! , you'll see !
    2008 Oct 20 12:27 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    As the saying goes, let's hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
    2008 Oct 20 12:33 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with peter Schiff , this will be FAR worse than 29 !
    2008 Oct 20 12:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    we have one article today talking of oil over $200, and this one now saying how low oil prices will somehow retrigger the economy.

    all of this articles have no evidence to support their opinions. the truth is that nobody knows what will happen, and with the exception of the dropping of commodity prices all the other news is negative.

    i also want to voice that the future will be good. but the question is when this good future will appear. to think it will be tomorrow is not realistic based on the information which is currently available.
    2008 Oct 20 06:05 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Apparently their writers are chugging the Government Kool-Aid."

    I think Barrons has become a new "Franchise".....their selling "Kool Aid" for the government now......
    2008 Oct 20 07:21 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Low price of oil and the low cost of materials, low food price etc will start to count after the stabilization of the home prices. Maybe this could counter some loss of jobs in the economy, but no way near the rest of the mess.
    Until the home prices are not stabilized and the accounting rules won't be changed for this not be repeated in the future i don't see people coming back to stocks.
    2008 Oct 20 09:16 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well said and I agree. When someone gets in a bind, they sell what's liquid, and that's blue-chip stocks. Few of these sellers in this age of indexing and ETFs stop and think about whether United Techologies or Caterpillar should be kept and GE and Pfizer sold. It's just a dumpfest and it makes all the analysts and stock-pickers redundant because they don't matter. It's either all buy or all sell.
    2008 Oct 20 09:20 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One thing is certain. There is no shortage of totally opposite opinions. After reading all the current articles available to me I've came to two conclusions. The economy isn't so bad, it's time to buy equities at very low prices. Or, we're in for the worst times ever. Sell anything and everything held. Where are valid opinions that concur? Who is recomemding trully safe places to park our savings. Gold maybe? Look at the situation of the early 80's and see the dramatic rise and fall of gold and silver. We appear to be in similar times now.
    2008 Oct 20 09:27 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The great depression is no more going to show up than the great pumpkin.

    All the doommongering fools screeching that the sky is falling can't add and have no idea what the US economy is to begin with, they are just repeating what their communist masters in the press tell them to say. Those have been predicting the immediate self destruction of capitalism for 160 years straight. And they are hopelessly wrong, and always will be.
    2008 Oct 20 10:20 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Things aren't as they seem, skim milk masquerading as cream." Gilbert and Sullivan.
    2008 Oct 20 10:40 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "It should be pretty clear by now that the governments of the world are willing do whatever it takes to prevent [the end of the world scenario]." phillips49


    The most convincing analysis I've seen suggesting that we are heading toward the 'end of the world scenario' in the not too distant future.
    2008 Oct 20 12:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Big money wants the Republicans to retain the White House. Gasoline prices are down and the stock market is going up. Financial crises favors Obama. What financial crises? By election day it will be off the front pages and hardly even a memory. McCain will pick up the battle ground states and the White House even though Obama wins the popular vote by three million plus.

    2008 Oct 20 05:55 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yes, it would be good if McCain won. Fascism really needs to be given a good try in this country so we can flush it down the toilet. Then Ron Paul in 2012.
    2008 Oct 20 06:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  

    I agree with SecMaven's numbers. Senator Obama looks very likely to hold all of the Kerry states (it was looking dicey in Minnesota but things have definitely firmed lately, plus Iowa, and New Mexico. Unless he also takes Colorado as well it will b3 274-264 McCain (unless the 2nd district of Maine elector also goes Senator to McCain, a possibility).

    If Obama does win Colorado he wins 273 (or 272) to 265 or 266.

    BUT, he will run up enormous pluralities in California and New York, while losing very closely in Florida. So his PV numbers will be 3 million plus more than McCain-Palin's, and we will have a VERY tense situation.

    We'll be an America in which the majority of its citizens are "anti-American". An interesting conundrum, No?
    2008 Oct 20 09:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree, things are not as bad as they seem. They are much worse. The most important metric right now is inflation. And last couple of months data shows no inflation to speak of. Yes, if you take food and energy out, it does show some. But, there is a metric which is hugely delayed in CPI: cost of housing. In CPI, it's reflected through (roughly) cost of apartment rent. And this cost is usually updated only once a year by owners. So we really don't know how falling house prices affecting inflation, because apartment rent prices are not synchronous with housing prices (people foreclosed from their property have to rent, driving prices up for a while) and will not change until year end anyway. In short, we are really in deflation right now. Despite all (feeble) efforts of Fed and Government. Unless Uncle Ben can jumpstart helicopters throwing out money, we are in much deeper trouble than anybody thinks. Think Great Depression v2.0.
    2008 Oct 21 12:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Muddling Investor
    Re , you are spot on ! thing are soo much worse than goverment /media portrays . In the great depression , the US goverment was not indebted to foreigners as is the case now . Some folks had savings + owned their homes outright , which is now not the case . Also the US was the main manufacturing giant of the world . China , malaysia , now are + pay their workers ave 18 cents hour . The Us worker cannot compete with this . The US standard of living is plummeting = Greater Depression . Folks that can't see /accept this , are in total denial .
    2008 Oct 23 12:24 AM | Link | Reply