Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Bloomberg has changed its headline from the alarmist "Argentina Default Looms" to the slightly more sober "Argentine Bonds Sink as Pension Takeover Fuels Default Concerns". But it was right, the first time round, as is evidenced by the prices on Argentine bonds:

The yield on the government's 8.28 percent bonds due in 2033 surged 3.2 percentage points to 27.91 percent at 9:14 a.m. in New York, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. The bonds yielded 12.16 percent a month ago. The price dropped 4.11 cents to 25 cents on the dollar, leaving it down 11.91 cents in the past two days.

Yep, Argentina's benchmark long bond is back to trading at 25 cents on the dollar, after having been the darling of emerging-market fixed-income investors for much of this decade. Argentina's sovereign spread is now a whopping 1,627bp, CDS spreads are over 35 percentage points, and money is flooding out of the country: volume in the foreign-exchange market was a record $620 million Tuesday, and for much of the day there was only one buyer of pesos -- the central bank. In JP Morgan's daily emerging-markets research note, Argentina analyst Florencia Vazquez said, ominously, that "mutual funds were sellers of central bank paper". One wonders what they're buying: what's safer than the central bank?

Wednesday morning, Argentina's Merval stock index is down 12% at 922; that's on top of an 11% fall yesterday. It was above 2,000 for most of 2007, and as recently as July of this year. The reason for the latest plunge is president Cristina Kirchner's decision to privatize Argentina's pension funds. The fear is that they will be forced to dump all their long-term holdings and buy sovereign debt instead: Argentina might need to borrow as much as $14 billion next year, and there's no one willing to lend it that kind of money.

If Argentina does default on its foreign debt, as the markets seem to expect, that'll raise very interesting questions about equal treatment of creditors, specifically as regards the relative treatment of new and old (defaulted) bonds. But that's down the road. For the time being, Argentina is going through its second economic implosion in a decade, and it's not a pretty sight. The only thing I can say for sure? If the goverment does default, Kirchner will be out. So she's going to continue to attempt harmful measures like privatizing the pension funds before that happens; the next step might well be some kind of bank holiday or freeze on deposit accounts. I suspect the ferry to Montevideo is quite full, these days, with Argentines moving their savings to the much safer country across the River Plate.

Print this article with comments

This article has 3 comments:

  •  
    Dont cry for me Argentina!

    As wealthy as Argentina was in the 1930's-1940's, there have been very few government's who have really cared for the welfare of their people.

    A country great in agricultural products, almost self-sufiecient in oil & gas and an educated population............... should be in the ranks of Canada!

    Wow, even Brazil is now better than Argentina!
    2008 Oct 23 11:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    thats south america.is north america far behind?
    2008 Oct 23 11:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The analysis about this latest bout of Argentina/Kirchner wierdness is almost uniformly half-baked and the commentators seem pre-disposed to jump to the conclusion that the country will default. But this is not new -- every adverse event in Argentina since 2001 has been interpreted as a signal that it will default again. The differences between 2001 and now are stark: Argentina has a floating currency; the most recent expansion was fueled by exports, not debt; it has much less external, dollar-denominated debt; it had over USD $40B in reserves; and it had significant budget and current account surpluses. I do not buy the argument that the proposed privatization (it still needs to pass the legislature, which is not entirely friendly to Kirchner) was needed to fund next year's budget or as a way to extinguish a big chunk of sovereign debt (AFJP accounts reportedly hold USD $15B of it). It seems to be more reflective of nationalism, a distrust of international banks and finance and a desire to unwind the "neo-liberal" mechanisms put in place by Menem. But, whatever the reason, it shows the Kirchners' fundamental misunderstanding of or indifference to conventional economic and market wisdom. And, sadly, the erratic behavior of the government itself, even though I don't think it signaled a default, might actually cause a default: There is now a run on the Peso, in response to which the Central Bank appears likely to burn through its currency reserves, which will back it into a corner and leave it few alternatives but to default. But I don't think all is lost, at least not yet.
    2008 Oct 23 11:30 AM | Link | Reply