How to Navigate the Troubled Auto Industry - Barron's Interview 10 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Barron's interviews John Casesa of Casesa Shapiro Group to get his views on the troubled and volatile auto industry. Some key points:
- A GM (GM) / Chrysler merger could happen because both sides are so desperate. But the track record for automotive mergers is poor, and this one is crippled by the fact both are already shedding market share. Cost savings might be easier to implement than figuring out how to combine their revenue streams with compromising their combined pull.
- The industry's challenge now is not funding cash-strapped buyers - it's that it can't even get customers into the showrooms. Adjusted for size, demand is at 50-year lows. Many automotive firms face the prospect of Chapter 11. With the big three, he thinks that "if one of the auto makers goes, they will all go."
- Casesa is alarmed Kirk Kerkorian sold his stake in Ford (F). "He's not one to give up easy. The sale is alarming." Still, he likes Ford over GM (GM) due to its simpler brand portfolio and the fact it owns 100% of its financing arm.
- Honda (HMC) and Toyota (TM) remain in a very advantageous position, particularly Honda with very little light-truck exposure. He calls Honda "probably the best-positioned auto company in the world right now," due in part to its strength in emerging alternative propulsion models.
- European carmakers are better positioned than their U.S. peers, but less so than the Asians - particularly Peugeot (PEUGY.PK), Fiat (FIATY.PK) and Renault (RNSDF.PK) which stand to benefit from the move to smaller cars.
- Among suppliers, he likes Magna International (MGA) and BorgWarner (BWA) with conservative balance sheets and little debt.
- Johnson Controls (JCI) is very diversified, and its battery business should benefit from the move to electric. Genuine Parts (GPC) will continue to thrive due to its ability to send any auto part to a mechanic anywhere in the U.S. within 24 hours.
Related Articles
|

























This article has 10 comments:
Collective bargaining contributed, unfortunately, to killing the golden goose. I lived in Michigan for several years, and I know the mentality that prevailed (and still prevails) there. The Big Three, their executives and their employees, are collectively (pun intended) responsible for their own demise.
It is not my obligation to bail them out, as a taxpayer (through a rediculous govn't bailout), or as a consumer (choosing to buy an overpriced lower quality vehicle).
The Big Three have shot themselves in the foot over and over again.
Yes, it will be a very painful event in American history if/when The Big Three finally admit their insolvency.
I can only hope that the end result will be an America that emerges again as the beacon of hope it once was.
Cheers and thanks.
The two biggest handicaps you face are believing anything the leaders of your COMPANIES and your UNIONS tell you. Very naturally, they are simply looking out for themselves. Well, let me ask you, where has their leadership gotten you so far?
So they hire lobbyists and pay off politicians to get the government to hand you bailouts. This is only spending good money after bad. If you consider where all this has gotten you, bankruptcy may be your salvation. At least it would give you a fresh start, free from the burdens of the past.
On Oct 27 11:41 AM DownOnMyLuck wrote:
> Why do we still discuss the US auto industry as the so-called Big
> 3? Honda, Toyota, Hyandai, BMW, and others, also manufacture here
> in the US. I would guess there are more employees working for those
> manufacturers than the Big 3.