Seeking Alpha
About this author: By this author:

Don't allow the media barrage of negativity to keep you from cashing in on these amazing times. Leave the paralysis to others. Take action to get ahead.

The S&P 500 is down 39% in the last year despite Tuesday's fabulous 11% rally. I've written extensively about the importance of scaling into solid, long-term positions via both individual stocks and index ETFs of both the plain and leveraged variety. I'm not going to re-hash that point today.

Instead, I have three other areas of finance that offer excellent opportunities for the bold: a trading tip for ProShares financial ETFs, a currency tip for those holding yen, and thoughts on real estate.

One of the most volatile areas of the stock market has been the financial sector. It has, therefore, provided some of the best trading moments. Traders don't care whether movement is up or down, just that it's there and preferably big. It's been gargantuan in this sector for the past two months.

ProShares offers both Ultra Financials (UYG) and UltraShort Financials (SKF). UYG delivers 200% the return of the Dow Jones U.S. Financials index and SKF delivers 200% the inverse of the same index. When the financials go up 10%, UYG goes up 20% and SKF goes down 20% -- in theory.

It seems then that the right trade is to buy UYG when financials are oversold and switch to SKF when they're overbought. I realize that different traders define oversold and overbought in different terms, and some hate the terms altogether. Here, what I mean is that the ETFs have reached the low or high end of their recent trading ranges by whatever measurements one uses to monitor that. I personally like MACD and RSI with an eye on sentiment for confirmation.

Some readers wrote to me Tuesday night saying they noticed SKF providing more extreme movements in both directions. It's provided better quick profits even in the long direction. On up days, holding SKF short has provided better gains than holding UYG long. They should return the same amount.

It's hard to get one's head around this because shorting SKF means that you're short the short position in order to be long, but it works. Look at Tuesday:

+17% UYG
-24% SKF

If the two worked perfectly, then SKF should have posted a 17% loss, not a 24%. So, shorting SKF at its highs would have been more profitable than buying UYG at its lows.

In a quick look back, however, I found that this isn't always the case. Look at Oct. 10:

+13% UYG
-13% SKF

That was just what we'd expect. What about longer periods? Here's the July 14-23 rally:

+51% UYG
-43% SKF

In that one, UYG was the better way to go. I don't see that there's much point rolling dice on which one's going to track better on which market movement. I'd keep it simple by just owning UYG when you think financials are going up and owning SKF when you think they're going down.

Onto yen.

I've advised holders of yen to start moving them into U.S. dollars anywhere below 100 yen to the dollar. I wrote about moving some of my money last Friday when I was able to buy dollars for only 95 yen. That was a smoking great deal, the best in 13 years, in fact. Just 16 months ago, the rate was 123!

Japan has an export economy and needs a weaker yen immediately. The super cheap dollar is all people are talking about here. It gets more airtime than the Nikkei stock index being at 26-year lows. That's why in a brief statement Tuesday, the G7 finance ministers and central bank governors focused on the yen as a worldwide economic threat. The Bank of Japan is going to cut rates and the government will do whatever else is required to take the shine off the yen.

Translation: these bargain basement dollars won't last long. If you have yen, get them into dollars pronto. The demarcation line at 100 is fast approaching. When we get back to 123, you'll book a 26% profit on the trade -- plus you'll enjoy fatter U.S. interest rates while you wait to make the migration back to yen. You could do even better by buying cheap U.S. equities or real estate with your dear Japanese yen.

Which brings me to real estate.

I wrote in Spring 2007 that despite all the headlines saying how awful the real estate market was, I found few bargains on a property hunting trip to Colorado's front range and Southern California. There were even competing bids on places of interest to me near Burbank. That wasn't a buyer's market.

It is now.

I'm making an offer on some horse property near Estes Park that listed for $390k a year ago. It's a short sale situation currently listed by the bank at $190k. I'll offer $150k, and be thrilled if they settle at $170k.

The place has a home that's in good condition, ready to rent, and a functional barn. I'll add some new fencing for horses and should be able to get around $1,300 per month rent. With current 30-year rates at around 6%, $170k minus a 20% down payment gets me to a mortgage of just $136k. The monthly payment will be only $815 per month, plus another $115 in property tax for a total of $930.

The result: I collect $1,300 to pay out $930 each month while watching the value of the property more than double in coming years.

The bargains are showing up. It's time to get busy hunting for real estate.

Don't let this phenomenal moment in economic history get away. Consider how you can get your fair share from cheap stock prices for the long haul, unprecedented volatility for short-term trading gains, a 13-year high in the value of the yen, and excellent real estate deals.

Print this article with comments

This article has 12 comments:

  •  
    I have been able to short SKF previously in Sept but lately ameritrade always reports no shares available. shorting skf gives a bit more profits it does seem.
    2008 Oct 29 12:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Im really interested on the yen to dollar price spread play however i don't own any yen. Would shorting FXY be a good way to capitalize on the need to bring the yen/dollar relationship back to equilibrium?
    2008 Oct 29 01:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The one day difference is surprising - sounds like an arbitrage
    opportunity ? :). [maybe it is because of some end-of-day trading differences - which might get wiped the first thing the next day ?]

    But anything more than one-day, then it is understandable. The ETFs try to do the two-times-change only on a per-day basis. So in any longer timeframe, the differences will vary.

    A quote from a seeking alpha article :
    [source : seekingalpha.com/artic...]

    For instance, if the Nasdaq Composite Index goes up 10 percent on Monday and then falls 10 percent on Tuesday, the total loss over those two days is 1 percent. The ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD), however, will rack up a total two-day loss of 4 percent, not 2 percent, as many investors might suppose without a careful reading of the prospectus.

    2008 Oct 29 05:13 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "I collect $1,300 to pay out $930 each month while watching the value of the property more than double in coming years."

    If this current real estate crash, which we’re probably only half way through, hasn’t dramatically driven home the fallacies in that line of reasoning, then nothing I can possibly say here will.

    And yes I know that $1300 is more than $930, but that's not cash flow positive btw. After expenses and the inevitable repairs, you need a ratio that's closer to 2:1.
    gl
    2008 Oct 29 07:03 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good luck finding a property that will rent for $2,600 and cost $1,300 to own/operate. They don't exist.

    I think the Colorado property sounds like a deal, despite the fear mongoring. Add the inevitable inflation that will hit like a hammer, and that property will most likely be double the purchase price in a short period of time. Not a bad deal.

    2008 Oct 29 09:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You need to put some more thought into your real estate deal.

    Your rate on an investment property will be much higher than 6%, unless you buy it down with points.

    If you take out a loan your lender will require that you have a hazard insurance policy. The cost of your policy will be significant, especially if the insurer gets wind that you plan to rent it as a "horse property". You need to build insurance costs into your monthly outflow.

    Banks don't just drop their pants on short sales. If you offer them 20% less than their asking price you'd better have some quality time scheduled with the individual handling their portfolio, or the only sound you'll hear from them will be silence.

    I could go on. You really need to do a few of these deals before you present yourself as an authority on Seeking Alpha.





    2008 Oct 30 12:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Real estate in gold terms (the only terms that matter) is still quite expensive. I wouldn't bother.

    As for the yen/dollar cross, I wouldn't touch it on either side; what is this, the race to the bottom trade? Dollars most certainly are NOT cheap. There is tremendous printing on both sides and no yield whatsoever. Both have done well lately on deleveraging and the unwinding of carry trades. In other words, they are both acting contrary to the fundamentals. The dollar is the absolute last place I would want to be right now. In order, I prefer gold, silver, senior bank debt, and CHF. All are vastly better than being long USD/JPY.
    2008 Oct 30 01:15 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    agreed on the rate comment. more like 7%...plus management fees (10% of rent), plust taxes, insurance, plus maintenance....likely cash flow neutral at best which is not entirely bad. Unless of course you do not plan to tell the lender that it is an investment property!?!?!?
    2008 Oct 30 12:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You have not considered all the costs involved in owning out-of-state real estate. Yes, there is the loan and insurance. What about travel costs to and from? What about local management?And maintenance for the house, barn and fencing, and probable expenses related to animal damage? Lots of fencing on horse property.

    Your mgmt/maintenance expenses could eat you up if not careful. Why don't you just buy a good house in a new subdivision with a good commute to Denver and wait that out? Or, get one where you live is always best. From bad experiences, I now never buy anything over a half hour drive from home. Great advice. Take it.
    2008 Oct 30 01:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Real estate is geographically diverse which is well known. However, from what many old investors tell me there have not been many times in history rental properties will produce a 2:1 coverage with a 20% equity injection. If the property is producing $370/mo or $4,440 per year after PITI payments he is realizing an unadjusted 13.1% cash on cash return. Not bad. Assume he has 10% operating expenses and a 5% recoup on the taxation side over the life of the property. ($1,300*12= $15,600 gross. $15,600 * 5%= $780. $4,440 - 780= Adjusted NOI of $3,660 and results in an adjusted cash on cash return of 10.8% with no accounting for future appreciation. Not a bad return, if you can do better right now let me know.
    2008 Oct 30 01:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In your RE deal don't forget to make some reserves for tenant default and loss of occupancy in between tenants.
    2008 Oct 30 05:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    bearfund--real estate is expensive in gold? Gold and real estate are both tanking, So waiting will not matter. Buy with dollars they are going up as gold and real estate go down.
    2008 Oct 30 05:07 PM | Link | Reply