Oil Bubble Continues Its Burst 18 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Even though the stock market is down 10% since the election, oil is down even more at -13.84%. Back in mid-2008, most people that called oil a "bubble" were ridiculed for not knowing the true "supply/demand" economics of the commodity. With a decline of 58% since July, the oil "bubble" callers look pretty prescient these days.
click to enlarge
Related Articles
|




























This article has 18 comments:
If the sole criteria for declaring and bubble is price decline, then every asset class was in a bubble. I don't seem to recall any prescient bubble callers on all asset classes. The last time I looked gold was off 27%, platinum 57%, copper off 50%, stocks off 40%.
I think supply/demand arguements are still valid for all asset classes.
It is my hope that the USA will use the relief on oil and gas prices to develop and implement plans to liberate us from foreign sources of energy. A world power can not remain a world power as long as it is dependant on foreign countries for it's energy. This is a national security issue that must be resolved before we export all of our remaining wealth. As it stands now, if we make someone out there mad, we're walking to work, if work is still open.
the saudi oil minister told us at the time that there was no shortage of supply and no excess demand in his order books.
the trading in the commodity pits was at the ratio of 22 paper barrels for every real barrel headed for delivery to a real customer.
goldman sucks did everything they could think of to push oil above 147 but eventually gravity prevailed.
> jack
for those interested in this technology which has been under development since 1948, go to google & look it up.
in the 1970's there was a collaboration between USA and USSR (remember them?) on MHD. the US program concentrated on coal-fired MHD but nitrogen-oxides generation and fouling of the electrodes by molten coal ash were major problems.
the russian program concentrated on natgas firing and was reasonably successful. we had a large superconducting magnet at argonne national lab that the russkies borrowed and enjoyed it so much that we had difficulty getting them to return it. just imagine the spectacle of a large USAF cargo plane landing at moscow airport in 1976 to deliver the magnet.
> jack
jimrogers-investments....
Surely, it will require more energy than a bunch of BLANK idea producers sitting at their monitors reveling in hindsight but still clueless. Reconstruction in the US, if implemented on the actual scale needed would eliminate all of the demand destruction in place and projected. Hell, we could import the tar now called Oil Sands directly for use as asphalt. Lets see, cement, construction equipment, steel not only as reinforcement but also to replace the pipes currently rupturing regularly throughout our major cities, transportation to/from, etc..
This would truly be a Bubble which would strain our internal capacity for years but would not be called a BUBBLE because we would call it modernization. It would be part of the Reindustrialization process in the US because besides our dependency on Foreign Oil, Canada and Mexico for instance, we are also dependent on our overseas manufacturing plants and all of the other base metals no longer prolific in the US caused largely by intense environmental rules and litigation.
Do you actually believe we can achieve any of the currently bubble eyed alt. energy infrastructure needed without extensive use of oil? 10 years from now we could be Blah, Blah, Blah. All of it could be. All of it is just blather because none of it is possible without the extensive use of the oil which everyone knows is constrained.
When the details are finally revealed, oil will start to move up. When it starts to be implemented oil will start a rather steep rise. Because in addition to our own stimulus package, similar Projects which entail the usage of oil will occur simultaneously throughout the Industrialized world and emerging economies.
The pressure on oil and food will be worse this time around because the US will participate in the growth as it strives to achieve parity between the manufacturing and service sectors from 2/3rds - 1/3rd to 50 - 50.
In the short term, oil could go below $50. Some call it good for the consumer, it is. It is also called deflation.
Inflation is just around the corner and Hummer ads are accelerating.
Many people will come out of this economic mine field holding stock in companies that no longer exist, or holding dollars that will then be worth much less than when they were received as governments try to inflate their way out of the situation. But, the person holding any interest in oil still in the ground, will still own the same number of miles travel or power for the same number machines.
Which would you say is the safer preserver of wealth for the average person not extremely skilled in trading - stocks, dollars or commodities such as oil?
Should have put more money on this one.
Fri Aug 1st 13:21 PM
Commented on:
How We Lost Faith in the Financial Superstructure
Peak oil is BS. Sure, it's a finite resource. Sure supply will eventually dwindle gradually and correspondingly demand destruction will occur. What we're seeing now are not supply and demand forces. It's market trading when prices change this fast. Not that there's anything wrong with that. We will see $2.50/gall gas by election day.
The name may be misleading because supply-demand fundamentals don't cause rapid price changes, only political acts like supply disruption or anticipatory trading reacting to the media & politicians sowing FUD (fear-uncertainty-doub... a basic sales and marketing technique. Remember: If it bleeds, it leads.
The Worst recession since the Great Depression was the one brought about Paul Adolph Volcker who by raising interest rates way above the rate of inflation caused an unemployment rate of about 12%. At its nadir, the DOW was trading at Book Value.
Prior to that the Yen went from 300 to the dollar to parity, Oil rose from $3-$40 and there was a Housing Boom and Bust. A financial crisis existed because of rising inflation. Carter's presidency went down ignominiously. And Reagan was elected. Sound familiar?
All I can really recall about the Carter presidency was his weekly fireside chats, the Hostage Rescue abortion and the Secret Service protecting him from the Killer Rabbit.
The difference is Deflation VS Inflation. If we follow in the footsteps of History, the current deflation will make way for the steepest rise in inflation since the 1970s.
Just a jaundiced view from an inexperienced traveler.
What about ALL Basic materials. Steel, Chemicals, Gas, Coal, even Solar, and Shipping, all TEC and most Health related. Didn't mention Oil.
I think the biggest criminals are the HEDGE FUNDS. They don't have state what and how much the own. They can trade anyway the choose WITH NO REGULATION!! Even Finance wouldn't be as bad off with some controls.
We'll now see what good a government controlled by one party can accomplish.
Our own Gas should be first, followed by Solar, Wind, liquid Coal, our own Oil, Bio diesel like Brazil, and Nuclear power like France. Something needs to get get started NOW , not in 6 months or a year. I personally think we go down in flames with our new President and a Democratic Congress that's done nothing in the two years they've had control. I think my wife ,the teacher, analyzes it best saying be careful what you wish for. Well you've got very inexperienced black President who is the most liberal Senator. Pray is all say.
On Nov 07 04:30 PM endoftheworld wrote:
> look also at the supply and demand curves.. you'll notice spare capacity
> nearly went to zero, creating a situation in which demand nearly
> exceeded supply... in that case, where an inelastic nearly vertical
> demand curve intersects with an equally vertical supply curve, the
> skys' the limit... hedge funds and speculation are only noise in
> a battle of fundamentals
I don't know myself, but estimate it at 10+ years with full renewable fuel regeneration for the whole country. Comparing what happened in Brazil vs US is a peanuts to pineapples situation.
The time to move is during the recession while demand destruction is ongoing not to help to get out of the recession but to lighten the load when demand accelerates again.
PS. We will do the exact opposite.
oiltradersblog.blogspo.../
Boone Pickens, Jim Rogers, IEA, Credit Suisse and many others gave their oil forecasts. Nice read indeed.
By the way, congratulations ob Bespoke. They have the best articles on this website. Awsome material.