Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Five key quotes from American International Group’s Q308 conference call: (AIG)

Clarifying the federal help AIG is getting:

We presently have an $85 billion, two-year bridge loan facility from the Federal Reserve Bank in New York against which $61 billion is currently outstanding. That $61 billion carries a LIBOR plus 8.5 and the commitment fee of 2% and the fee on the undrawn portion of 8.5%. Clearly, these terms are not sustainable.

We have $37.8 billion securities lending facility from the Federal Reserve of New York, with $19.9 billion currently outstanding and as noted earlier this amount is fully collateralized, it's a liquidity facility not a loan.

We are participating in the government's commercial paper funding facility… We have an approved line of $20.9 billion, with $8 billion currently outstanding.

The Fed buys AIG mortgage-backed securities:

We and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York are creating a new financing entity that will be capitalized with $1 billion of funding from AIG and up to $22.5 billion of funding from the Federal Reserve. This entity will acquire substantially all of the RMBSs from AIG's securities lending program. [Now] AIG's remaining exposure to losses from its U.S. securities lending program will be limited to declines in market value prior to the closing of this entity and our $1 billion of funding.

... and CDOs/CDSs (credit default swaps):

We and the Federal Reserve Board will create a second financing entity that will purchase up to approximately $70 billion face amount of multi-sector CDOs on which AIG has written credit default swaps. Approximately 95% of the write-downs AIG financial products has taken to-date is in its CDS portfolio, these were the ones related to the multi-sector CDO. AIG will provide up to $5 billion in subordinated funding, and the Federal Reserve will provide up to $30 billion in senior funding to the financing entities.

We will earn a return on the equity that we've invested in the vehicle. We'll then share… in the upside of that.

AIG signed an agreement with the U.S. government essentially transferring them a 79% stake in the company. The move is to stanch the outflow of cash from the company, but analysts worried that if and when the market for mortgage-backed securities revives, the government may make a lot of money from the RMBS it holds, but AIG will not:

The deal is, not fixed in concrete forever. As you can see the movement we made from the first transaction to the second one, is a rather quantum improvement... What these two arrangements do is they stop the cash out flows for the most part.

The biggest problem remains: How will the pricing work?

Q: So the CDO holders not being made whole here… You are buying the CDO for $0.50 on the dollar? Is that what you expect to happen here?

A: No… the CDO is being purchased at a negotiated rate. And… the Fed is heavily involved in that negotiation.

Q: Are [you] saying that the Fed is going to be strong on holders? What is motivation of the CDO holder to accept less than par... because you're saying, look, I am going to offer this to you, take or leave it and if the CDO holder says, I'll leave it, what do you do about it?

A: Yes, they can also the tear the credit default swap upside... I think there the structure has been designed in a way that's balanced in terms of the various stakeholders motivations and incentives. So we believe this structure will be successful in accomplishing the restructuring and the de-risking of the AIG portfolio.

Q: It is fair to say that there is going to be... a little bit of execution risk here in your ability to get the holders of the CDOs to accept what you are offering them.

 
Print this article with comments

This article has 1 comment:

  •  
    At last someone has a plan to unwind some of this financial garbage !

    MER sold some of this junk willingly at 22¢ on the dollar.

    I'm sure other holders will take the opportunity to clean their books.
    2008 Nov 11 02:08 PM | Link | Reply
More by SA Editor Judy Weil
Other articles by SA Editor Judy Weil »