Comparing Valuations in China and the U.S. 12 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Since US markets peaked last October, the S&P 500 is down 41%, while China's Shanghai Composite is down 68%. Over the same time frame, the trailing 12-month P/E ratio of the S&P 500 has gone from 19.62 to 20.21, while the P/E ratio of the Shanghai Composite has fallen from 45.85 all the way down to 14.31. So even though China's equity markets have declined much more than the US on a percentage basis, earnings have held up much better.
China is still considered an emerging market and is experiencing growth of 8% or so. Growth stocks generally have much higher valuations than value stocks, and it's surprising to see China's P/E at 14.31, or 6 points lower than the S&P 500's P/E of 20.21.
click to enlarge
Related Articles
|




























This article has 12 comments:
With China, however, I have to question the validity of stated earnings. What accounting standards were used? Who is doing the auditing? What are the consequences for corruption and misstatements? Can we even get information about insider trading?
Yes, I hear you. The US has lagged in each of these areas too. I would argue that business standards in the US are not as bad as in China, but the general observation explains a lot about why investors are driving both of these markets lower. They are attempting to buy a margin of error around claimed earnings.
Surly you jest...
Is the Fed hiding what they are doing with $2 TRILLION in taxpayer's money *transparent*?
www.bloomberg.com/apps...
Read the Bloomberg story.
Maybe we are becoming more like China, than China becoming more of a democracy.
The US spends billions yearly to make China look bad. We do not have democracy here, either. ( Read Jefferson or Franklin to get a glimpse of democracy.)
I would like to get some of the $15,000 a month the CIA pays the Dalai Lama, and undisclosed amounts paid to Human Rights Watch, Reporters without Borders (sans verite') to be China irritants.
If you believe the media about China, you're clueless.
On Nov 11 03:04 PM Chris B wrote:
> Of course, it's always the E part in the PE ratio that is questionable.
> Otherwise, you could just pick low PE stocks in each market and have
> bought bargains in both cases.
>
> With China, however, I have to question the validity of stated earnings.
> What accounting standards were used? Who is doing the auditing?
> What are the consequences for corruption and misstatements? Can
> we even get information about insider trading?
>
> Yes, I hear you. The US has lagged in each of these areas too.
> I would argue that business standards in the US are not as bad as
> in China, but the general observation explains a lot about why investors
> are driving both of these markets lower. They are attempting to
> buy a margin of error around claimed earnings.
In investing, a sure thing is anything but.
On Nov 12 08:49 PM Viktor wrote:
> Chris B., your information is very interesting! Could you point to
> an efficient way of investing into the China small caps? Buying individual
> ADRs is too tricky. Thanks!