The Financial Crisis: Getting the Best of Warren Buffett? 4 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Through November 21, 2008, Berkshire Hathaway's (BRK.A) year-to-date return was -36.4%. Since last December 11 when Class A shares hit a record high of $151,650, it has lost nearly half its value closing at $77,500 on Thursday; its lowest level since August 2003. This has not gone unnoticed by shareholders. Some investors have lost confidence in the ability of BRK to pay its debts.
After the collapse of AIG driven by derivatives, many investors fear the same could happen to other insurance companies including BRK.A. Berkshire could have to pay as much as $37 billion between 2019 and 2027 under some derivative contracts if the S&P 500 index and three other stock indexes are lower than when Berkshire entered the contracts. Most insurance companies' shares are significantly down since October 1st compared to the S&P 500. During that period, AFLAC Inc. (AFL) is down 41.9%, Manulife Financial Corp (NYSE:MFC) is down 60.5% and BRK.A is down 34.7%, while the S&P 500 is down 31.1%. Derivative exposure is not the only problem facing BRK.A. The stock price of General Electric Co. (GE) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), have fallen, rendering Mr. Buffett’s warrants to buy common shares worthless for the time being. Personally, I think the situation is playing to BRK.A's strength - a strong balance sheet. As its competitors lose capital, they will be more conservative in writing new business. BRK.A may well step in and fill the void. What BRK.A currently owns may be worth less, but Buffett will get more opportunities to buy things at cheap prices and once again come off looking like a genius. Disclosure: Long AFL, MFC, GE Reference:
Related Articles
|



























This article has 4 comments:
Though the insurance business is something of guesswork, which he admits, large premiums up front are super cheap capital which can be invested very profitably with his great expertise and the insurance business is thus not that risky.
BRK shares being down doesn't bother him. He knows that the businesses the shares represent will continue to grow earnings over time and have healthy and growing returns on equity, so if the market is beating down the companies he owns because of widespread pessimism, he'll be glad to buy more shares. Watch for his year end report and mark my words, you'll find he has been buying like crazy. That doesn't mean the shares won't fall further, but 5-10 years from now you can bet their earnings, book value, and eventually share price will climb very nicely.
As for the puts on the major indices starting around 2019, the buyer was an idiot! A dozen years out for at the money (current index level)! Any money manager of billions of $ ought to have better math skills and some knowledge of economic history. As long as GDP doesn't stagnate for a whole decade with little to no growth, the growing economy will be reflected in growing businesses that leverage even faster-growing profits. The beauty of an index bet is that you don't have to pick the winners. As long as the whole pie grows just as it has consistently (except during the Great Depression) since the days of the Pilgrims, Buffet will pay nothing on this bet.
The key is the simple and profound principle of long term compounding, which the stock market currently does not understand. The growth of an economy such as ours is by a percentage of the prior year rather than a fixed amount. That is why the DJIA grew 175-fold in the last century, from a value of 66 to 11,500, which is only 5.3% annually! The Dow was simply loosely tracking the GDP. Why anybody would pay serious money to protect against a stagnant or falling GDP after a dozen years is beyond me, given that history lesson. Buffet does not "play" in risky derivatives. Selling these puts was a steal.