Mary Lisanti is president and portfolio manager of AH Lisanti, an investment management company currently focused on small cap growth companies. She is a 33-year veteran of small cap growth research and investing. For the first 12 years she was a small cap analyst and strategist on Wall Street. During the past 18 years, she has managed small cap portfolios at premier asset management companies.
As CIO of ING Investments LLC, (1998-2003) she was responsible for building the active equity management team, and assets under management in her area grew from several hundred million to several billion dollars. Prior to ING, Mary was at Strong Capital Management as Senior Portfolio Manager for both the Small Cap Growth and Mid Cap Growth Strategies and was Managing Director and Head of the Small/Mid Cap team at Bankers Trust Company. Mary was named Fund Manager of the Year in 1996 by Barron's. She was named #1 small cap analyst in 1989 by Institutional Investor's All-Star Research Team. In addition, she was ranked #2 and #3 in 1987 and 1986 respectively.
I had the pleasure of talking to Mary just before the New Year's holiday at her office near Rockefeller Center. We had first met in the late 1980s when she was interested in a technology company that proposed the radical idea of a keyless car ignition or computer security system using a fingerprint. Interesting how what seemed futuristic now seems almost as old hat as-- well, men on the moon.
JA: How are you feeling about the year ahead?
ML: Undecided. I'll give you some positives and some negatives. One big positive is that corporate profit growth will still be decent. Corporations are at very high profit margins, but when you break down what's going on, there's no reason they shouldn't go higher. Virtualization - the use of cloud computing, and other aspects of today's high tech should help them cut costs. For that trend to stop, two things would have to happen: a long period of negative revenue growth, accompanied by fast-rising wages. Neither of those things is happening.
That will be a positive for the market. Corporate profits are growing 8-10% and we believe that can continue, and that is widely dispersed across the board. Small caps can grow even more,we believe, although again there will be wide dispersion in individual results. This will be a classic stockpicker's market.
The biggest negative for the market is that we cannot seem to govern ourselves. That weighs on multiples. That's why, four years into this recovery, multiples are still low, particularly when you take into account where interest rates are and how GDP growth, although below trend, continues to chug along at 2% or so. In that scenario, logic would have it that multiples would be in the range of 18-19, but they are not. Why not? I believe it is because of our inability to govern. Politicians are behind the curve;as they usually are, in addressing our structural issues to bring the long term deficit issues under control. Will they address the long term issues or not? If they do so now, it will require only modest changes to entitlements and spending. The extent to which we address those issues will affect the performance of the market going forward.
It is psychologically important to multiples: if you can slow the growth in spending at least a bit, you give people more confidence. In the Clinton years they managed to slow the rate of growth in spending, and Clinton left office with a surplus. I believe we will spend most of 2013 arguing about entitlements and other budget issues. Next year it will be the Democrats saying no to entitlement reform, just like this year it was Republicans saying no to taxes. I don't know how much it is possible to get done, because it is being done in a fishbowl and from ideological positions that don't accommodate compromise.
If they do not get something done, I fear that U.S. debt will get downgraded again.
JA: And would any of the DC politicians feel responsible if that happened?
ML: I do not believe so, no. Politicians, in my opinion, are in the business of passing the blame. If there were another downgrade, it would affect President Obama's legacy, and I don't think he wants to be the president who oversaw two debt downgrades in his time in office. Both sides will have an incentive to compromise and hopefully they will. The biggest risk to all of us, and to the market, is that the dollar loses a bit of its luster as the currency of last resort.
When you look at Japan and China and Europe, they are getting their act together with regard to being attractive places to invest and could even potentially be attractive as reserve currencies in a few years. My biggest concern is that we permanently change corporate behavior: if you have a climate of uncertainty for long enough you make people afraid. Business overall has been clear with Washington that the uncertainty is damaging. R&D tax credits, farm and agriculture bills, accelerated depreciation - Congress has been handling these as though they were annual issues, and they're not. They affect multi-year planning. When the R&D tax credit was put in place in the early 1980's, it was in place for 4.5 years. That would be better-- it would give businesses the ability to plan longer term.
These and other things are casualties of this ideological warfare in Washington.
JA: What do you see as strengths in 2013?
ML: It is an enormous positive that housing is recovering, and the recovery should continue, assuming Washington does not cut the mortgage deduction. Unemployment is declining, although it is declining too slowly. And we have cheap sources of energy. A number of industry sources believe that we will be energy independent in the next decade or so, which is a huge positive for our manufacturing competitiveness.
When you look at these things, once we make it through this budget and debt-ceiling problem, things look a lot better.
Governments all over the world have been spending money to fix the problems that caused the recession, and odds are that things will not fall apart again soon. Over the past several years, we have had a major issue every year that has "terrified" us: last year it was the potential breakup of the Euro and Greek debt default, and this year it was the budget crisis in the U.S. Beyond the budget crisis, I do not see an issue that has the potential to scare investors as much as these two issues have. We should enter a period of more "normalcy," where macro issues take a backseat to fundamental issues, and that change should allow multiples to increase. But belief in a more stable future will come slowly.
JA: What should we look for in 2013 when we look at investments?
ML: As small cap growth investors, we look for earnings growth. But one of the great positives in this market is that there are many ways to make money in the market. When I came into the business in the late 1970s, you could make get 7-8% returns several ways. You could make money with yields -- those companies with no earnings growth offered very high dividend yields, say about 7%; those companies with earnings growth offered more modest dividends, say 2-4% dividends and 4-5% annual growth in earnings. Growth stocks offered very little in the way of dividends, but you could get capital appreciation as earnings would increase 10% to 15% annually. Then, as we moved through the great bull market of the 1980's and 1990's, we got to the point where dividends were out of favor and capital appreciation was the only way to make money. Now dividends are back, and once again, there are multiple ways to make decent returns in the stock market, depending upon one's tolerance for risk. That is very, very positive for the equity markets.
JA: How about sectors? Any of special interest, or any you would avoid?
ML: There are good companies in every sector. I would not recommend the utilities, but there are very good opportunities in materials, energy, consumer products and services, industrials and financial services. In most of these, the small caps usually have something unique about the way they do it, or the technology they apply to it.
Tech spending is not forecast to be up much in 2013. There will be winners and losers. We need to keep in mind that the corporate world is moving toward Software as a Service, which allows them to stop buying perpetual licenses, and to pay as they use software. They are going from buying licenses and maintenance contracts, and now are basically paying just for what they use. Same with cloud computing. So they are going from spending $20,000 on software and a server to paying $1,000 month. So even though tech spending is forecast to be close to flat, the companies that will be winners will have SaaS and cloud computing. These trends will hold down spending.
It's hard to see how the semiconductor companies are going to prosper in that environment, unless it is the specialty chipmakers who are specialized in populating ever-smaller chips with ever-larger amounts of circuitry for tablets and smart phones - or those companies that are specialized in the ability to manage the signals for those tablets and phones. But other than those two, I don't see a lot of growth there. And I would be careful about traditional license-oriented software companies.
JA: What about healthcare companies?
ML: Interesting. It's hard to guess how ObamaCare will play out. There are some long term secular trends in healthcare that are worth keeping in mind. Keep your eye on the value proposition: better, faster, cheaper, more automated. One of the most interesting areas is the second generation biotechs. Think about AIDS, for instance. Over the last 25 years it has become a livable disease - that is, we haven't cured it, but we can make it possible to live with it, and to do well, not just to survive for a few more months. Now the industry is working to make cancer livable in the same way; there are whole new classes of drugs that enable people to live with cancer, and not to just be blown away by it in a short time. We are possibly spending the same amount of money making cancer livable as we used to, but now we're spending it over a longer period, and not all at the end of life. Diabetes monitoring, for instance - the closer we get to continuous glucose monitoring, the better for diagnosis and treatment; One of our investments is Dexcom (NASDAQ:DXCM), which has a promising technology for that. All those big diseases are interesting, and medicine is getting its arms around them too.
JA: How about healthcare IT?
ML: It has historically been mostly about billing and insurance, but now the future is to move on to quality of care. Since we have had health insurance as a society, the focus has been on what you might call "industrial metrics," such as how many patients you can process. Now the quality of the outcome is more important, and best practices are more important. There will have to be penalties for readmissions of the same patient. Mobile apps for monitoring things like blood pressure, glucose, heart problems and blood gases - these things are going to become standard practice over the next 5 to 10 years.
JA: You mentioned the impact of technology on industry.
ML: There are lots of new beginnings now, along with outmoding of old things. Software as a service and the use of the cloud - this is the biggest piece of cost to cut. If you can cut your IT costs you have overall better margins, and better processes too. And industrial automation is interesting too. The first generation of automation concentrated on, for instance, lasers to cut steel. Now automobiles are being made with lighter materials, so new lasers are needed, lasers to cut nonsteel materials. Aerospace is an interesting area for this. Two things that are driving aerospace are new materials that lower weight and cost, and a continuing cutback on oil-based materials. There is a bit of a renaissance going on in aerospace.
One of our investments is IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) for the new lasers needed to deal with new lighterweight materials. Another is Polypore International (NYSE:PPO), which is making the membranes needed for new electric vehicles like the Chevy Volt and the Nissan Leaf. By the end of 2013, the company is expected to be supplying membranes for 24 models of cars. That goes back to the fact that fuel efficiency standards by 2025 will be at 54.5 mpg.
Another of our investments is Aspen Technology (NASDAQ:AZPN), which basically supplies SaaS for factories and plants. If you are a refinery, for instance, you are required by law to take your systems down every so often for maintenance and test for a number of things such as safety and pollution. Doing that manually is difficult; it can be done, but it is hard, and if you are global it is harder. Aspen automates all of that, and it is basically in a field by itself.
JA: And energy?
ML: The shale revolution will be a big job creator, and the move toward natural gas for vehicles is important. Fleets will be moving to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), and we believe the infrastructure will be built out for CNG refueling. Federal Express (NYSE:FDX), UPS and the other big fleets will be the drivers. We are interested in Westport Innovations (NASDAQ:WPRT) for the CNG engines. And we are watching Clean Energy Fuels Corp (NASDAQ:CLNE) for the CNG supply chain, but big oil will be the installer. We also believe solar will become economical to use, with panels on the roofs, for instance, of warehouses, and power being sold back to the grid when it is not needed. Between the increased supply of natural gas, shale energy, coal, oil and renewable, we can get to be energy independent.
JA: How about housing?
ML: Housing is fascinating. What happened with housing is what happened with autos. Now after a period of low sales, we-- as a nation-- probably need to do some catching up. We could need 1.7 million new housing starts for a couple of years-- that would double the current rate. The Echo-boomers (who used to be called Generation Y) are starting to buy houses; their demand for houses is growing at 5% per year, and will grow at 10% per year soon. My personal opinion is that this housing cycle will be a long one, similar to what we saw after the housing collapse in the mid 1970's.
In the first few years, we will see a catch-up in pricing, but after that we believe housing prices will probably go up a couple of percentage points per year. If they implement the rules on mortgages that are being talked about, the housing market will become a lot steadier and more stable-- more like the Texas market, where they tightened the downpayment requirement and favor 30-year-fixed mortgages. That will be positive for the housing market and for consumer confidence.
There is nothing better for consumers than to have their biggest asset become more valuable every year. Three years ago if you hadn't already lost your job, you were still afraid you might lose it. Your 401(k) and your house were devaluing. This recovery is more like the late 1970s than the 1990s. People got burned in the mid-70s and it took a long time to feel better. When we are operating at full potential, we should have 3-1/2% to 4% GDP growth, and that will come eventually.
JA: And in 2013?
ML: I think GDP this year will be 2-1/2% overall because of federal and state problems, but corporate GDP growth will be a good bit better than that, assuming there is a budget deal at some point. The first half of the year if we watch the government argue about spending, it could be a bit of a damper on growth. If we regain faith that the politicians will be able to compromise and come up with some answers, the market will go higher. Having our debt downgraded shook everyone's confidence. So the market is at 12-13 times earnings as a result.
If we get a budget deal we could get much stronger investor confidence, but in the short term, our ability to govern ourselves is the big issue. Once that is resolved, the market will lift.
JA: Thanks, Mary.
For AH Lisanti: For financial intermediary use only. Not for use with investing public.
The information provided should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. It should not be assumed that any security transactions, holdings, or sectors discussed were or will be profitable, or that the investment recommendations or decisions we make in the future will be profitable or will equal the investment performance discussed herein. The views expressed reflect those of the portfolio manager as of 12/31/2012. The portfolio manager's views are subject to change at any time based on market and other various conditions. The performance reflected herein is not representative of performance of AH Lisanti individually managed accounts or comingled vehicles that AH Lisanti advises.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.