The Deteriorating Real Economy's Financial Indicators 18 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
More and more we see concern being expressed about the deteriorating real economy and less emphasis being placed on the crises within the financial sector. The concern about the growing weakness in the real economy points to a longer and deeper recession than had been anticipated.
The current recession, as defined by the NBER, is in its twelfth month and trails two other recessions which lasted 16 months, as the longest post-World War II downturns on record. As economists revise their forecasts, most seem to believe that the 16-month period will be exceeded and many are saying that the current recession will reach the 20-24 month time span.
Economists only have to point to the daily release of employee layoff announcements to support their increasing pessimism. Companies are restructuring and these efforts are accompanied by reductions in workforce by 5,000 and 10,000 and more, per firm. On Thursday, AT&T (T) announced that it was going to lay off 12,000 employees and was taking a $600 million charge in the fourth quarter to cover severance payments. And, given recent experience, there will be two or three other companies also announcing layoffs. There will be more today…and Monday…and…
Then these layoffs must work their way through the rest of the economy. Lower spending…credit card defaults…additional decline in sales…more layoffs…and so on and so on. The effects are cumulative.
The policy problem is how to stop the cumulative contraction so that the downward spiral is broken.
The potential effects of this downward spiral in the real economy are being translated into the financial markets and the warnings are rather severe. For example, take the article in the Financial Times, titled “Record number of companies at risk of default." This article focuses on the Markit iTraxx Crossover index which, measures the cost of protecting junk-grade companies against default. This index rose above 1,000 basis points for the first time ever indicating, “a record number of companies are on the verge of default because of deepening financial problems.”
The authors also write, “Some of the world’s leading investment-grade companies look in danger of default, according to CDS prices.” The point being that the future shows nothing but dark clouds now. As these firms continue to restructure to avoid default on their debt the situation, at least in the short run, can only worsen because the layoffs lead to lower incomes which, results in lower spending which, results more restructuring and so on.
This deterioration in the real economy is also being transmitted to the government sector. There are two concerns being expressed in terms of the government securities. First, at local and regional levels…state and local governments…there is a restructuring gong on as government revenues drop and attempts are made to bring government budgets into balance…or at least into manageable level of deficit.
Second, governments at the national level are attempting to protect financial markets and combat the deterioration in their real economies. As a consequence, national deficits are ballooning and concern is being raised over the possibility of default on the part of sovereign nations. Another article in the Financial Times speaks to this concern:
Sovereign CDS prices soar as debt mounts. Credit default swaps, which insure against bond defaults, rose to all-time highs on the US, UK, France, Spain, Italy and Germany yesterday…The dramatic rise is due to investor concerns over the amount of bonds the government will have to issue to bail out the banks and stimulate the economy.
The concern relates not only to the current economic and financial difficulties but also to the possibility that these governments will not be able to stem the downswing and will have to issue more and more bonds in the future.
Retail sales figures for November have just been release and the story reads that November retail sales are amongst the weakest in many years.
The difficulty that any government faces in attempting to compose a monetary or fiscal policy which, can turn this situation around and is also in the best interests of most economic units in the economy, individual, family, business, or non-profit, to get back to basics, to restructure what they do, to cut back their living standard, and to reduce debt. Consequently, government efforts are like “pushing on a string”… there is nothing to push against.
Related Articles
|





















This article has 18 comments:
Start running, boys. You know that when it all collapses we will be looking for you, right?
DerivativesCollapse.co...
Did You Think:
JoeSixPack:
Investor88:
Sheople:
DrJackpot:
Cruiser9:
What a breath of fresh air all of you are! Seems to me you've all been awake (instead of asleep, as most have) during the last months. I've been awake and appreciate discovering others who have also and who are willing to speak what I believe is the truth. Feeling very angry and certain that things are going to get far worse over a much longer period of time than the morning talking heads on every channel would like us to believe.
Please keep on commenting here.
Thanks for being sane in a crazy world.
We need to *drastically* reduce the size and scope of government. We need to start with abolishing the income tax and property taxes...move solely to consumptive taxation and tariffs. Read up on what Jefferson and Madison said on this!!
Some stuff for y'all:
fairtax.org
givemeliberty.org
Lets see. Assume 100,000,000 taxpayers X $200,000. That gives us
20,000,000,000,000, or, in words, twenty trillions of dollars that you have just printed. That, I suspect, will be multiplied a few times by the magic of banking and financial derivatives that hardly anyone understands.
Does anyone have an economic model to deal with that? Well, Bernanke might actually print that much and we can find out in the real world.
Why not let us all print our own money. We could put George W Bush's face on the greenbacks.
That is the ultimate form of free enterprise.
If we are to give newly printed money to all taxpayers, why should we give the most to those who have the most? Why not a flat sum or, to be really wildly creative, why not give the most to those who have the least? Why not a taxpayers' lottery?
Without serious regulation, it will mostly end up with the big financial firms in any case. Of course, if we could repeat the process every 20 years, that might help.