Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Let's start today off with a bit of humor…

…now that's a bailout package that I think we can all agree on.

All kidding aside I think a "quiet problem" facing the nation as it tries to resolve the current crisis is that most people (be they politicians, policy makers, citizens, etc.) are more interested in what makes them feel good, as opposed to the mathematical business decisions that need to be made right now.

In other words, while I'm sure it's cathartic to yell at the banks for not increasing their lending volume after receiving TARP funds, the mathematical reality is that they need those funds to be solvent, past lending volume was hyper-inflated and it would be foolish for them to increase their lending as that would only lead them back to the same position they were in prior to receiving the funds.

The housing market was hyper-inflated and while I'm sure no one wants to hear that the housing market is going through a necessary correction, the fact remains that the correction is a necessary part of having stable housing markets in the future.

Foreclosures are unfortunate and tragic and everyone wants to hear how the government is going to stem the tide, but (again) you can't legislate, modify or "save" people from having bought more homes than they can afford. Facilitating the transition to more affordable housing makes more sense than trying to delay the inevitable with loan modification, delaying foreclosure proceedings, etc.

…and the list goes on and on and on.

At the end of the day the solutions/ideas that may make us feel the best aren't necessarily the ones that are going to resolve the crisis, and in many cases will only make things worse. As a result it's time for us to start accepting the harsh realities of the crisis and begin creating solutions that actually address its root causes, as opposed to only easing the pain of unpleasant symptoms.

Disclosure: at the time of publishing the author didn't own a position in any of the companies mentioned in this article; the ideas expressed are solely the opinions of the author and shouldn't be viewed as financial or investment advice.

Print this article with comments

This article has 21 comments:

  •  
    It’s time for everyone to go back to the beginning and remember what started all this, and while it has to do with housing, it has nothing to do with the usual suspects.
    I have been saying since 2007 that what we have is a destruction of confidence, at that time in CDO’s, in order for a small group of Generation Me short sellers to destroy the monoline insurers. It all goes back to that and just snowballed out of anyone’s control (except for the short hedgies that perpetuated it) afterwards. Now we’re stuck in a mess that needs 2 things:

    1). To Pass a Wind-Fall Capital Gains Tax of 65% on ALL short sales retroactive to 01/01/08 to help pay for all these bailouts and prevent future disasters, and

    2). To refinance the monolines so that States and local municipalities can issue bonds again. At the SAME time Congress should give DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR STIMULUS for every bond written for infrastructure. Bigger bang for the buck, AND unless we get the private sector and the Pimco’s of the world involved – nothing we take hold.
    2008 Dec 09 07:30 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Mr. Lee

    The fundamental flaw in your thesis is this paragraph,

    Foreclosures are unfortunate and tragic and everyone wants to hear how the government is going to stem the tide, but (again) you can't legislate, modify or "save" people from having bought more homes than they can afford. Facilitating the transition to more affordable housing makes more sense than trying to delay the inevitable with loan modification, delaying foreclosure proceedings, etc.

    The homeowners did not say to themselves, wow, this is more home than I can afford. Rather, the mortgage brokers who held no fiduciary relationship to the homeowners steered them to banks who overinflated the value of the homes in lending money. It is no surprise that the housing market is overvalued. Your argument is to let the homeowners fail and reward the banks for accepting unreasonably high appraisals. A better argument would be to allow home prices to return to affordable levels, borne on the back of incredibly foolish Ivy-League trained bankers who stupidly believed they could get enormous yields out of mortgage backed securities with AAA bonding. But what do I know, I rent.
    2008 Dec 09 07:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Agree time for the American people and government to confront reality.
    2008 Dec 09 08:56 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    'transition to more affordable housing' -

    i live in an area where for the last 10 yrs the builders have insisted on building only 900,000 mansions on 1/5 acre lots, and no affordable housing. the county employees can't afford to live in the county & have to commute 60 mi each way. can we blame the greed of the builder corporations? the empty 900,000 mansions could be converted into apartments (?) if the county code so permitted.
    > jack
    2008 Dec 09 09:25 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Whose reality??? One of my favorite Peter Drucker quotes is "The best way to predict the future is to create it".....

    The "lets put housing into the dark ages" crowd must have some perverse cost-benefit analysis procss....

    Let's see: 10% deliquency /default rates..10% unemployment ...40% DOW crash...

    Maybe to those who crawl over others, and delight is misfortune, are enjoying this time...

    However, if you care for others,, then this is a time to seek workable solutions...
    2008 Dec 09 09:57 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Mr. Lee or Mr. Potter? Consumers will buy what is offered under a payment plan. While some are frugal, the vast majority of people will buy the geegaw maximum trinket if extended the credit, and a payment that appears plausible.
    Now do you suppose that proffessionals trained in appraisal, loan ratios, credit analysis etc. might provide a product and service that is not guaranteed to bankrupt the purchaser? Pay day loans with 5% fees, credit cards with 24% plus rates, home loans that reset or amortize negatively without documentation. Who really is at fault Mr. Potter?

    Then there is, of course bond and securities rating agencies that hand out AAA ratings like candy at Halloween, not to mention conflicts of interest. Commercial banks bundling up the crap and leveraging at 1/40 while their hedge fund entities are short squeezing the very same depository banks and commercial lenders.

    The horror, the greed, the culpability......... but according to you we all need a dose of reality. Enron times 10,000. Massive fiduciary fraud, destruction of capital, pensions and companies for greed, then blame the consumer. To be sure, consumers, workers, middle class families will take the hit, not the hedge fund CEO's who's assets are cushioned and safely stashed.
    Reality check? We are already in the death grip of reality, unfortunately there is not an equivilant guillotineto address justice for all the perpetrators.
    2008 Dec 09 10:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I basicly agree, everyone needs to grow up and take responsibility for their own actions. No one held a gun to anyones head to sign a mortgage, they might have convinced them to do so, but in the end the individual must do their own due diligence and make their own decision.
    2008 Dec 09 10:16 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    >>Pass a Wind-Fall Capital Gains Tax of 65% on ALL short sales >>

    Insane. If they broke a LAW, prosecute them. If not, why penalize those who, looking at the Emperor's new clothes, see his willy. I've been shorting GM for YEARS. They have had the very-best-business-pla... for decades. Same with the financials - one who can recognize unsustainability is stupid to not profit from it. Those who made naked shorts - and the brokers who aided them - should be prosecuted. I buy puts.

    >>if you care for others,, then this is a time to seek workable solutions..>> If you put the emphasis on WORKABLE., you must realize there's not enough money on earth to fix" this mess. This is Humpty Dumpty after the fall. Globally, losses are in the hundreds of trillions.. It's time for individuals, businesses and governments alike to get familiar with the concept of logical consequences. We can't keep on closing our eyes, clicking our heels and pretending that will fix things.
    2008 Dec 09 10:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://tickerspy.com
    Government ineptitude caused this and I certainly don't trust the people who created the mess to clean it up. In order to get some sense of sanity back in the markets we should repeal Sarbanes/Oxley the CRA mark to market accounting and make all forms of variable rate mortgages illeagal. We should also reinstate Glass/Steagul and the up-tick rule. Once those steps have been taken appoint a special prosecutor to investigate all parties concerned including government officials and congresspeople. Should malfiasence or any other criminal activity be discovered the perpetraitors should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
    2008 Dec 09 10:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The question of individual responsibility vs the responsibility of the group towards the welfare of all, has been debated since the beginning of humanity which occurred back in 1950.

    It might be called the "widow and orphan" problem, for short.

    Let's face it, some people are born into dysfunctional families, and even though many overcome these severe handicaps and even rise to become President of the United States, such as George W. Bush, many fall by the wayside and buy houses they can't afford to live in.

    Telling them to face up to their mistakes is something like doctors telling the five out of six lung cancer patients who smoked cigarettes that they wont treat them because they basically caused their own lung cancer.

    Tempting but not politically feasible.
    2008 Dec 09 12:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Albuquerque New Mexico has serious problem of lack of water.

    Solution to keep new construction going was to divert water from the San Juan and Chama rivers in northern New Mexico.

    But a potential problem is arising. Pumping that water if, in fact, New Mexico starts to see electric shortages within several years.

    www.prosefights.org/ab...

    So. Other housing problem loom.
    2008 Dec 09 12:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Baldguy,

    You are 110% correct,

    As my house increased in value by $600,000, I had to ask myself, did I earn this money, NO, so common sense tells you not to spend it on car's, a boat a second house, or vacations, etc. Many people saw their nieghbors making 20% a year and wanted in with the most leverage they could find.

    Blaming it all on the cocaine dealer is back ass words. It was greed by all, banks, consumers, our government, ALL OF US,
    2008 Dec 09 01:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Americans didn't get their reputation as the consumer of last resort from a banker. We have been gorging ourselves on consumer goods "using other peoples money" for years, and now to blame our last meal on a banker?

    Can we take no responsibility for our own actions, it's always someone else's fault. That's the American way.

    I am a baby boomer, but I wait anxiously to hear the great wailing as Baby boomers find out that their entitlement attitude will bring them to a sad retirement, if one at all. Financial responsibility was not one of the lessons of the sixty's, remember, it was, me, me, me.
    2008 Dec 09 01:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Love the cartoon!

    I do agree with JL that home prices have to come back down to reality although that will be very painful for many. But until they do, homes will be priced out of reach for many honest, hardworking people who deserve them.
    2008 Dec 09 01:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think this is fine no nonsense article. Underwater homeowners need to realize that the underwater amount is in effect an unsecured loan for tens if not exceeding a hundred thousand dollars. Sometimes, when crunching the numbers, it is best to walk from that unsecured 150k debt, take the credit ding for 3-5 years and move on. You most likely will not qualify or have availability of credit for the next 3-5 years of any significance anyway so bite the bullet and use the time to recover instead of trying to figure out how to pay back that 150k. Put the 150k away for retirement instead.
    2008 Dec 09 01:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The current crisis is just "wake up call" for the bigger disaster when the US Government files for Bankruptcy. The National Debt - $53 trillion !

    There will not be medicare or drug benefits because there will not be any federal money to pay for this. Cut now, cut everywhere possible. Go back to as pure capitalism as possible. Otherwise, just keep pilling it on so your kids have to pay & deal with it ... not you!
    2008 Dec 09 02:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Remember Obama's campaign slogan: Change, yes we can.

    What will be the first thing Obama will do after inaguration: announce a stimulas package nearing a trillion dollars doing infrastructure. That's the affirmative answer the US government will not face the reality.

    The current financial crisis and the resultant great recession is induced by excessive debts. Using more excessive debts to cure the problems created by excessive debts is similar to pour more alcohol to the drunk. The drunk will die quicker.

    I think, in a short couple of years, we can all say to Obama: Keep the change.
    2008 Dec 09 03:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Now that the latest pyramid scheme has collapsed and the credit has dried up, Americans and their government will have to come to terms with the fact that many high-wage jobs were allowed to be exported. On top of that, the government allowed tens of millions of low-wage workers into the country to compete with American workers for jobs and public services.

    The result is a terrific whipsaw effect. Few in power are able to understand the strain that average American workers are experiencing. (Try watching Lou Dobbs to see this disconnect.) But no matter how much D.C. attempts to juice the economy with more cash, people can no longer spend when they do not earn enough to live on.
    2008 Dec 09 04:27 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No worries...we are printing money now instead of going into debt! :)...save ourselves now, but hyperinflation down the road, but deal with it then..all started by the huge debt service built by Bush and his Iraq war spending (and the military oil spending and oil delivery uncertainty in the Middle East, which spiked oil and started oil as a commodity investment).
    2008 Dec 09 07:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Spending money you don't have is like wetting the bed. You get a warm feeling and a sense of relief, then before you know it you are in a very uncomortable position. So these clowns are going to dump money out of B-52's? I don't believe there are so many people can't learn that lesson.
    2008 Dec 09 11:20 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Blaming the Shorts might make you feel better, but they did not create the biggest Delusionary Credit Bubble of all time- all we did is recognize it as such. Maybe you missed that, and thought trees grow to the sky.
    If shorts break laws, prosecute them. But why focus on the one group of people who are sometimes the only buyers in collapsing markets (we have to take our profits)?


    On Dec 09 07:30 AM apppro wrote:

    > It’s time for everyone to go back to the beginning and remember what
    > started all this, and while it has to do with housing, it has nothing
    > to do with the usual suspects.
    > I have been saying since 2007 that what we have is a destruction
    > of confidence, at that time in CDO’s, in order for a small group
    > of Generation Me short sellers to destroy the monoline insurers.
    > It all goes back to that and just snowballed out of anyone’s control
    > (except for the short hedgies that perpetuated it) afterwards. Now
    > we’re stuck in a mess that needs 2 things:
    >
    > 1). To Pass a Wind-Fall Capital Gains Tax of 65% on ALL short sales
    > retroactive to 01/01/08 to help pay for all these bailouts and prevent
    > future disasters, and
    >
    > 2). To refinance the monolines so that States and local municipalities
    > can issue bonds again. At the SAME time Congress should give DOLLAR
    > FOR DOLLAR STIMULUS for every bond written for infrastructure. Bigger
    > bang for the buck, AND unless we get the private sector and the Pimco’s
    > of the world involved – nothing we take hold.
    2008 Dec 10 07:58 AM | Link | Reply