Seeking Alpha
About this author:

David Smick contends that “The World Is Curved” because in financial markets people cannot see over the horizon. That is, the future is subject to incomplete information and, hence, risk and uncertainty.

To Smick, a money manager, writer, and public intellectual who founded, edits, and publishes The International Economy, and an adviser to both Republicans and Democrats, this concern with risk and uncertainty has become a worldwide phenomenon that eclipses national governments. And, this loss of control, especially for the United States, is a “new thing”.

American politicians are now struggling against this reality and are attempting to regain the relevance that the United States once held. Smick says it can’t be regained. This is the most important point stressed by Smick in the book and leads to three more specific conclusions.

First, the United States must act as a partner in the world and not an independent, isolated unit. Smick argues “that most U.S. politicians operated as if the global financial system did not exist.” In the last eight years or so the people in the Bush administration, including Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve System, believed that the United States economy was “a closed system.”

In fact, the author contends that the United States is the last world power to experience this reality check. The Mitterrand government in France in the early 1980s serves as an example. Here an avowedly socialist government attempted to ignore international markets and ended up establishing open trade, balanced fiscal budgets and an independent central bank to keep inflation at low levels. The experience of France was repeated in many other countries around the world and now must be adopted by the U.S.

Second, in globalized world markets financial leverage can become excessive and uncontrollable. In a financial bubble, financial leverage always increases. Smick contends that the world has reached the point where, because of all the new and innovative financial products available throughout the world, central banks find themselves relatively powerless. Central banks can create and sustain bubbles, but they can do very little to resolve an economic crisis once the bubble bursts.

But two things can happen when there is excessive leverage. First, if people have little or no equity invested in their projects they can become exceedingly careless — intentionally or unintentionally — because they have little to lose if things go wrong. Second, since modern financial innovations have removed the tie between an initial lender and the risk or fate of the borrower the discipline of the lender can suffer. Both factors, Smick argues, can reduce discipline in financial institutions and markets.

Third, the power of central banks has substantially declined. To support this argument, Smick draws from the Japanese economic collapse of the 1990s to apply to the U. S. situation. He draws three lessons from this review: First, in the creation of a bubble, an economy can become overloaded with debt; second, during the bubble an economy becomes more and more fragile and eventually bursts; and last, central bankers become powerless to rescue the system because of the consequent deleveraging and retrenchment that must take place.

In getting to this point Smick does not present a very pretty picture of Alan Greenspan. Greenspan is painted as an individual who was always looking to “one up” others, who worked diligently to identity arcane bits of information that he could cite and overwhelm “competitors” in order to maintain control of a situation or retain the power of his position. Greenspan is seen as someone who had no coherent, overarching model of the world. He worked from the bottom up, seeing the trees but not the forest.

Without a coherent economic model, Greenspan reacted to the collapse of the stock market bubble of the 1990s by keeping interest rates extraordinarily low and by allowing the value of the United States dollar to fall dramatically. He did not achieve much economic growth for his efforts and he did very little to stimulate employment. What he achieved was another bubble fueled by a massive creation of debt.

The bottom line is that financial leverage can grow almost without limit in times of financial expansion while any attempts to prevent or offset the efforts of financial markets to deleverage and restructure prove to be almost totally ineffective during periods of financial contraction.

To summarize what must be done, Smick argues:

  • the United States must accept its role as a partner in the world community and get away from thinking that it can act independently of the rest of the world;
  • the United States must continue on the path of open trade with the world and cannot revert to feelings of superiority or of class interest;
  • the United States must become disciplined in the conduct of its monetary and fiscal policy so as to avoid financial bubbles and the creation of incentives for firms and people to leverage up their balance sheets. Once discipline is lost it is difficult, in a policy sense, to bring back financial stability. This means that the United States must put more focus upon the value of the dollar so as to cooperate with the world community.

Only in these ways does Smick see the United States creating one of “the most attractive destinations for global investment.” Creating such an environment must be the longer term goal that we should be shooting for.

The World is Curved: Hidden Dangers to the Global Economy, by David Smick (2008: Penguin Portfolio; 280 pp.)

Print this article with comments

This article has 17 comments:

  •  
    The "curvature" can be accounted for to a great extent by stidying and understanding history and human behavior...and then applying it. The last part is the trickiest; do you think the market is going up from present levels because that is what it has done durin the course of your lifetime? If so then you are one of those people who has all the facts in front of them but does noot apply them and you should put your money under your mattress. Data on the current state of the economy, generational patterns (see generationaldynamics.c... and history tell us that we are in a period of economic crisis (a secular bear market) and correction. Historyt tells us that we must revert to the mean and in doing so will dramatically over correct since we we above the mean for so long. There is no way to stop this. We can interrupt it but that will only make the correction worse or longer.

    Seek out objective, well informed experts and combine their knowledge with long term data, then apply all of that to todays reality and you will have a view over the horizon.

    My predictions: a secular bear market that lasts for as long as 20 years (but did it start in 2000?) and the Dow well below 5,000 and possibly as low as 1,500.

    --Fred Voetsch 12-13-2008
    2008 Dec 13 12:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Fred, I agree about reversion to the mean, but also keep in mind that "the mean" is a moving target and the aggregate value created by all the infratructure build-outs in the last 75 years has raised the baseline somewhat. What I am saying is that "the mean" is not as low as you might think it is - if you account for this societal progress baseline increase.

    But as for Dow 1,500, that's just silly.
    2008 Dec 13 12:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree. The stock market is a time series, and technology gives that time series an ever increasing moving average.



    2008 Dec 13 08:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Many factors are at work limiting the ability of nation-states to solve their own problems. Things like mass migration and environmental degradation are beyond the ability of a single government to solve. Governments have become hobbled by their dependency on bond investors to fund spending. This "Sovereignty Crunch" is the end result of the credit crunch, and has just begun to play out.
    2008 Dec 13 09:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Dow at 1,500?

    Not quite. Maybe 15,000, then 25,000, once the inflation that's coming gets here. And it will get ugly and out of control.

    Trillions are about to bail from T bills, and knowing the coming dollar devaluation and inflationary campaign underway, equities will be bought.

    You will never see your 1,500 on the DOW. Sorry.
    2008 Dec 13 11:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://www.prw.net
    I agree. 15000 Dow and 30 dollar soda can.
    2008 Dec 14 12:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ok, based on the idea that money supply increased like 7x (i read somewhere), 15k dow will probably mean money supply has to double again? with people going into saving mode before the job market recovers, i really doubt that will happen before 2012.
    2008 Dec 14 01:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    trust is gained based on character, which is potrayed by the government and businesses. currently, the government, wall street and the auto 3 are setting very bad examples of business management. only when all the crooks are punished will trust be regained.

    dow will not be 1.5k due to the excessive money supply, but it will have to come down more to the real value the listed companies are giving to the public, and they are still overvalued IMO.
    2008 Dec 14 02:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What I found particularly illuminating in this book were the chapters on China and Japan.

    China's demographic time-bomb, the opacity of its public companies, its pursuit of negative real interest rates, its stockpiling of commodities... all ominous rumblings behind a facade that is still relentlessly bullish.

    Are Japan's housewives finally starting to buy stocks? I saw a NYT article to that effect recently, but who knows.
    2008 Dec 14 02:16 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Everybody obsessing about Dow 1,5k or not is missing the point. Dow in EUR in about 6,4k right now, and has fallen only about 20% from a multi-year level of about 8-8,5k. This is what Mr. Mason is referring to. Nominal Dow can go to 1 million but the world couldn't care less, since your currency will have gone Zimbabwean by then. As for wild guesses my guesstimate is nominal Dow at 4k, however exchange-weighted at EUR at around 2k.
    2008 Dec 14 07:22 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Dow 3-5k possible but no clue when or if it will ever be that low. We cannot predict the future so one guess is as good as another. However you might not want to bet the farm that it is impossible for the Dow to be lower than 7.5k recent low.
    2008 Dec 14 07:30 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    well at least the unilateralist, i dont like you i will drop a bomb on you policy of the bush/cheney/rumsfeld.w... group is over (almost).
    > jack
    2008 Dec 14 09:08 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    We are simply the best of the worst. It will take decades to regain our credibility.
    2008 Dec 14 12:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The entire financial system has lost a lot of credibility. I don't see how printing more money out of thin air is going to regain any of it. I think some big fundamental changes would be needed to regain any credibility.

    -The Federal Reserve should be abolished and an actual Federal Reserve system put into place - You know, one that is owned and controlled by the Federal Government, not private banks.
    -Fractional Reserve Lending abolished once and for all. Why should a bank be allowed to lend money it does not have?
    -Fixed government spending - balanced budget mandatory (except for war time or emergencies)
    -Back the currency with something tangible so they can't print money out of thin air when they see fit - that hurts those of us holding USDs.
    -Fixed interest rate that does not move would give stability to the system. Why entice people to take on more debt and spend money they do not have with lowering the interest rates? That just creates more swings up and down in the market...
    -Encourage some savings among Americans! I don't know how - maybe change the tax system to a consumption based tax so that families are encouraged to save their money? Who knows.. but there must be some good ways to encourage savings in the future.

    Just a few ideas, not all of them are good...
    2008 Dec 14 04:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I prefer "private" intellectuals. Public ones are a bore.
    2008 Dec 14 04:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    3 Steps for America To Regain the World's Trust:

    1) Stop thinking, speaking and acting like America is the best.

    2) Stop using CIA and war to control the commodities America needs.

    3) Get America's own house in order.
    2008 Dec 14 05:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    how long would it take the folks on this website to trust the good ole usa after they have been burned by the phony AAA rated worthless paper.??(as foreigners thinking.)
    2008 Dec 14 06:59 PM | Link | Reply