Madoff Scandal: Where Was the SEC? 28 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Regular readers know that we are generally more sympathetic to government actors than the investment punditry. We think this stems from more direct experience with those in government and our disciplined effort to look at a problem from all perspectives.
Despite this perspective, there is one institution that gets a consistently low grade: The SEC. A few days ago we suggested that investors monitor potential changes at the SEC. We continue to believe that this would be important to the long-term health of the market. If the new leadership were to suspend mark-to-market accounting rules pending clarification, it could even have a short-term effect.
Likely Changes at the SEC
Here is what we wrote yesterday on RealMoney:
The Madoff scandal is yet another black mark for the SEC and Chairman Christopher Cox. In past comments I have noted that his official term of office extends until June of 2010, although Obama could appoint a new chairperson. In fact, several top SEC staff members announced their resignations right after the election. Cox himself has indicated plans to step down at the end of the Bush term, although he is willing to serve longer until a replacement is found. Gary Gensler (Treasury and Goldman Sachs (GS)) is the transition official in charge of the search. Some think that he might also be a candidate. Others mentioned include former SEC Commisioner Roel Campos, also on the transition team. Some speculate that Robert Pozen (former Fidelity vice-chair and now Chairman of MFS Investment Management) is a leading candidate.
The issues facing the SEC are deeper than just the personnel. There will be some effort at comprehensive reorganization to get rid of the gaps among the SEC, the Fed and the CFTC.
Charlie Gasparino just reported that the SEC is saying that they get many tips like the one received on Madoff. One of the critcisms of Cox is that he did not go after the budget authority needed to fulfill the enforcement responsibility.
Conclusion
This upcoming change is a market positive that is not yet on most radar screens. A good dissertation topic for someone in political science and public policy would be the study of Presidential transitions and why timing created over 200 years ago no longer works.
We give President Bush high marks for his attempts at handling the crisis and turning over the reins. Despite the "country first" attitude, the delay in implementing new programs is contributing to the economic distress.
Related Articles
|






















no regulatory over sight to name a few failures. His lack of leadership has left the investment public on there own. This man need to resign ASAP!
How, ever he is so out of touch that he has no idea of what damage he has done. So FIRE HIM!!!
The DOJ? Oh, you're anticipating an uptick in your white collar crime practice! Well, good luck counselor! Everyone needs an advocate. Even the freaks on Wall Street!
On Dec 13 07:34 PM Jimmy Lathrop wrote:
> Forget about the SEC. Just beef up the DOJ.
Well, the New York state governor is a blind person. It is perfectly convenient for so many...
As for Obama, he has no clue of what is going on. This is why he hired the entire former Clinton administrations.
The problem that arsonists (from both Clinton and Bush administrations and their masters from the Wall-Street) started a terrible fire and greatly miscalculated the consequences.
The biggest addition to the SEC was the PCAOB with the assitance of Sarbanes Oxley, but futile in power or enforcement. The structures and business processes of the markets have not been fundamentally challenged.
Where is the legislation to address the immense powers of the Depository Trust Company (formed by the largest brokerage firms, with Goldman Sachs, Merril Lych, Lehman, Citi, Mellon BNY......) and the structures which create the opportunity for Maddoff type crimes?
SEC needs an overhaul and the business process needs to be challenged. If Mr. Cox or any of the new leadership has the guts and political will to tackle this gorilla head on, then we can talk about change and true transparency. When Enron and Worldcom were the points of disgust prompting Sarbanes Oxley and the PCAOB, we created a band aid, surrounded by the hoopla and media onslaught chastising accounting firms for extending into business consulting other than true accounting and auditing.
That created a vacuum of threats to go unnoticed and the FED and SEC even encouraged lax controls for hedge funds. The irony was that more capital was being driven as a resource to hedge fund type funds to circumvent stricter Sarbanes disclosures. If Madoff's Ponzi scheme was the TItanic, then the iceberg is out there, but we need effective legislation to turn the light on!
On Dec 13 03:00 PM TomArmistead wrote:
> Cox performed his duties as expected by those who appointed him -
> he did nothing, gracefully and conscientiously - set up commitees,
> got input, made proposals, and ignored the the greed and corruption
> running rampant on Wall Street.
>
> In his defence, the CDS operators got an exemption from regulation
> long before he took office - during the Clinton adminisration. <br/>
>
> Change will be welcome.
>
The moral of the story is.. if you do a small crime you wil be punished. Do a big crime and there is only reward. Such a country!
if a man steals a loaf of bread he goes to jail.
if a man steals a railroad, he goes to congress.
> jack
(Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer)
WilliamBanzai7
You know Vesco and Boesky, and Keating and Milken,
Leeson and Mozer, and Ponzi and Wiggen,
But do you recall, the most famous securities fraudster of all?
Madoff the WALL STREET FAKIR
Had a GIANT PONZI SCHEME,
And if you ever saw it,
You could say it was Wall Street's own worst dream.
All of the other Wall Street fraudsters
Used to laugh and call him names;
They never believed poor Madoff
Made a legitimate Alpha trade,
Then one shady Wall Street trading eve,
Madoff spilt his own beans to the SEC
"Madoff oh your scheme's so bright,
Won't you go to jail tonight?"
Then how the Wall Street fraudsters loved him
As they shouted out with glee,
"Madoff the WALL STREET FAKIR,
You’ll go down in securities fraud infamy."
Q: Whats the difference between Bernie Madoff and the CEO of a bulge bracket Wall Street investment bank?
A: Madoff is not asking for a bailout.
Not that socialism would be any better, of course. I also believe that if socialism ever comes to America, these same people will be the commissars.
"The never ending battle for truth, justice, and the American way"
Where is Superman, now that we really need him?
Deja vous?
Not only Ponzi schemes, but NYSE also falls apart when everyone wants their money out. Particularly borrowed, leveraged money as such.