Tech Troubles Aren't Over - Barron's 5 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Tech troubles aren't over, Barron's Eric Savitz says. While it would be great to put recent woes behind us, layoffs have become commonplace among tech firms, followed by multiple downward earnings estimate revisions, sometimes accompanied by fresh layoffs. The culprits: waning consumer demand, huge cutbacks in IT spending, tight credit conditions, a strong dollar, and massive corporate cost-cutting.
Market-neutral tech portfolio manager Pip Coburn says he's having no problems coming up with short ideas - in which he tries to focus on sectors which are weak even after factoring out the overall slowdown: "I want ideas where the business model is going to implode anyway," he says.
Coburn is bearish on chip equipment makers as the semiconductor industry hits a wall. Moore's law, which dictates chip speeds will double every 18 months, has collapsed, he says.
Another sector worth shorting: broadcast TV, as watchers abandon scheduled programming and watch video on the web.
More shorts: Lexmark (LXK) - faces a trend toward using generic cartridges. Blue Nile (NILE) - too much competition. Shutterfly (SFLY) - prices are collapsing. Fairpoint Communications (FRP) - he doesn't like wireline-centric telcos.
On the long side, he likes Cisco Systems (CSCO) which will benefit from online video. NICE-Systems (NICE) - which records phone conversations for call centers, a great play on increased focus on regulation and monitoring. Apple (AAPL) - iTunes locks users into buying more iPhones.
Related Articles
|





















But if you talk to people in tech, you will see that the flood has reached their doors, and the first thing corporations are cutting, in huge numbers, is tech. Especially these days when people are making 09 budgets.
It's gonna be another tech slaughter in 09, but this time there was no real bubble, and tech will just be collateral damage.
See in you Web 3.0.
iSuppli has done extensive iPhone teardowns to determine accurate costs, and they estimate that Apple pays about $150 to $170 in costs per iPhone.
So, the correct answer is, yes they will make a lot of profit. And yes, they will sell a lot of iPhones. Don't believe the sceptics who think that every product is affected equally due to recession. There are so products that, while not exactly 'recession proof', are at least recession resistant.
PS What's the point of this article in general? Why can't I just read the original Savtitz article? There's nothing new or novel here, just a re-hash of what someone else wrote.
On Dec 14 04:49 PM Scalpulator wrote:
> Does anyone really believe that an iphone will be profitable at $99
> during a 100+ year flood?