The Madoff Affair: Were His Sons Actually Responsible? 9 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Okay, this is a bit controversial, I’m sure, but let’s look at the facts:
- There was a huge amount of paper generated in support of these schemes. This is an inordinate amount of work for a 70+ year old man to do. It requires technical know-how and all sorts of scale.
- Mr. Madoff confessed to his two sons.
- We all know about Madoff’s statements regarding regulators, and how fraud would be detected.
- This odd addition of Mr. Madoff’s niece marrying an S.E.C. agent into the facts, included in the S.E.C.’s own mea culpa.
Now, stop thinking like a rational person watching an elderly man confess. Mr. Madoff, if he was so deceitful this entire time, shouldn’t be taken at face value when it comes to his confession.
Think like this is a Law and Order episode. This is the first 5 minutes of the episode and the police have gotten a confession. Well, that means only one thing: the suspect will change to whomever the confession takes the heat off of. In this case, his sons. Is it more likely that his sons were running a scheme, with confidants, and tearfully confessed to their father? I don’t know. What I do know, however, is that a devoted father would probably protect his sons blindly.
Couple this plausible scenario with the aforementioned ridiculous amount of work it takes to gimmick up the confirms and whatnot that were used to support the returns claimed by the firm, and those documents were extensive (see link above), and you seem to have a more reasonable explanation. Is it surprising the S.E.C. isn’t finding any evidence the children were involved? Uhhhh… they missed the entire thing to begin with, so no.
Related Articles
|

























This article has 9 comments:
And you don't need tons of 'em either. You just need them to be good enough to withstand the first scrutiny, and then time and the convinction of the other person / firms does the rest.
Same with the Kerviel guy @ SocGen. He produced all the documents that were needed to keep the compliance / audit off his back. His only problem was that the trades were way too big and could not possibly evade attention for too long. Yet another case of one lonely man winning vs. a very bureaucratic system that doesn't have enough time to really examine every single piece of evidence down to the very last penstroke.
Food for thought.
So proposing that we make gov't employees czars over automobile manufacturing is a farce.
I'm watching the entire US economy unravel like a cheap sweater...interesting!
There can be little doubt that at least several other people were involved - likely his direct family members, and maybe the one non-family guy - an accountant or systems guy, I believe - mentioned so far in press reports.
I suspect that the entire crew of family members working for Bernie are involved to some degree - they may not have realized how BIG the fraud was, but stealing $25MM gets you the same charge as stealing $15 billion, or whatever. And while I have some sympathy for the entirely innocent victims who 'lost their life savings' with this utter scumbag, I have no sympathy for the fund-of-funds jokers who rake off fees, treat themselves and clients to $200 lunches, then act "shocked" to discover that they, in turn, have been ripped off. Next time, do some DD, you A-holes!
The whole corrupt industry stinks in so many ways, and has so many duplicitous, lying fraudsters working in it, that it is hardly a surprise that some massive frauds will be uncovered as the market tanks.
Lock these bastards up and throw away the keys - if Bernie's sons are in on it, then they should die in prison, just like I hope Bernie will.