The Forces of Deflation Are Stronger Than People Realize
an article to
We need to figure out the inflation vs deflation debate.
A few months ago, I decided that short term we would have deflation. I had bought long duration treasury (TLT) calls. Treasury yields have been crushed. I wish I had bought more. (The calls increased in value tenfold.)
Now the treasury move is approaching parabolic: http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/c/3m/t/tlt. Treasuries have no substance. Economic textbooks say that they need never be repaid. Clearly the fundamentals are terrible. Parabolic move plus bad fundamentals equals inevitable crash.
We can make another huge return, betting on the treasury crash, if we can time it right. But I think the forces of deflation are stronger than people give credit for:
http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/deflator.html. Also, there are still too many treasury bears for the crash to happen yet.
Comments encouraged.










I suspect that word of the Fed's intentions leaked out months ago and was the factor behind the irrational rise in the long-bond price.
By no means I am an expert nor I do I claim to be one. I am a infant on the block and appreciate an opportunity share my views.
Thank you!
As a side note, perhaps it's an elaborate scam by our dear Unkle to get mortgage rates down by implying that they will be a buyer of bonds which tricks market participants into bubbling up the prices so they dont have to stick it on their balance sheet. Of course that would mean they have forethought.
Have they actually bought any T-bills yet? Can they buy the T-bills that Asia refuses to buy?
Now the treasury bubble finally makes sense to me!
It's not fed's buying that caused the bubble but speculation that he is likely to do it at some point. Which I think would be dumb at the current prices, I hope they'll buy some high-grade corp bonds instead (those are going up too by the way). Either way injects money into the economy but the latter approach makes much more sense.
On Dec 19 09:50 AM Roger Knights wrote:
> If the Fed can throw unlimited money at long-term treauries, as it
> recently hinted it would do, it can keep up the price.
>
> I suspect that word of the Fed's intentions leaked out months ago
> and was the factor behind the irrational rise in the long-bond price.
colin, i love this quote from the krugman link.
knows when. I don' think the treasury will fail, becouse the central bank can always print money. Inflation and deflation will ebb periodically. The real question is timing as you said.
On Dec 20 02:48 PM henarl wrote:
> So, how about buying TBT and selling covered calls against it?
The "unlimited" balance sheet is more theoretical than practical. Despite the inherent second derivative or counter-party risk in CDS that mask the true default risk of the underlying asset, the prices are somewhat informative. CDS on US paper continue to trade up in price. Eventually the true risk of these assets will express itself in the price/yield that the market requires.
When you combine the current yields with a potentially depreciating dollar, it's a one-two punch that creates intensely negative real returns for foreign investors.
we wrote about the rationale behind shorting treasuries here: www.marketfolly.com/20...