8 More Investment Candidates from Forbes' 'Best Small Companies' List 1 comment
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
This is a continuation of my search for the best small companies from the 200 listed in Forbes 2008.
You can refer to the previous results here: 1-15 | 16-32 | 33-70 |
The companies ranked 71-130 has yielded 8 results. To recap, below are the criteria of how the companies are being filtered.
- Immediately exclude financials (don’t understand or know how to value them)
- Run the companies through the intrinsic value spreadsheet with the P/E as the growth rate, but capped at 15%. The selected companies shall exhibit;
- Positive, consistent and growing cash flows.
- Consistent margins. Fluctuating/decreasing margins over several years will not be accepted unless the other criteria are outstanding.
- Above average returns from capital investments (CROIC, ROE, ROA)
- Strong balance sheet
- Companies should have at least 5 years of operating history
- The companies that make the cut will then be reviewed individually
Results
- Portfolio Recovery Associates (PRAA) - collects portfolios of defaulted consumer debt
- Techne (TECH) - develops hermatology controls and biotechnology products
- Computer Programs and Systems (CPSI) - designs hospital IT support systems
- Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) - manufactures chocolate and other confectionery products
- Company with a long history and very honest and candid management.
- Credo Petroleum (CRED) - explores for oil & gas
- I was surprised that Credo made it past the filter as it is a business typical of high capex but it is one of the rare oil & gas companies that is cash flow positive. Margins are stable for a cyclical company.
- Dionex (DNEX) - makes analytical instruments for the chemicals industry
- Neogen (NEOG) - develops products for food and animal safety
- Gen-Probe (GPRO) - develops and markets clinical diagnostic products
[click to enlarge]
Remarks
I noticed that as I kept going down the list, the quality of the businesses started to decline. Margins are inconsistent, returns are low or non-existent as well as growth in revenue and FCF.
Disclosure: No positions at time of writing
Related Articles
|




























This article has 1 comment:
I think somebody from SEC has to take a closer look at their books,
My gut tells me they are no better than FNM,Enron etc.