Seeking Alpha

ManagingMoney.com


About this author:

We are familiar with OPEC and the effects they have had on the price of oil over the years. The OPEC nations meet on a regular basis to decide how much oil they will allow the rest of the world to have from their stores. They set quotas and limits on production in an attempt, they say, to keep the price steady at a level that is good for both consumers and the producers. We've seen how that works. Fortunately, many of the producers balk at reducing output and have a tendency to cheat, producing more than their allocation. Now, we are witnessing the formation of a new cartel, this time of producers of natural gas.

Natural gas is used widely in Europe and Asia for heat, as it is here in the US. Last week, a consortium of natural gas producers met in Moscow. The goal of the meeting was to establish an OPEC-like cartel of gas producers who would control output. Although the meetings participants were quick to say that they do not intend to engage in price fixing, the keynote speaker, none other than Vladimir Putin, said "...despite the current problems in finances the era of cheap energy resources, of cheap gas, is of course coming to an end."

Russia is no stranger to throttling gas supplies in order to negotiate better prices. The Republic of Georgia can bear witness to that fact, having had their entire supply of Russian gas, which is used for heating homes there, cut off in the middle of the freezing winter. Now that winter is here again Russia is turning up the heat on the Ukraine by turning off their heat as well. Coincidentally, prior to Russia cutting off their gas, both Georgia and the Ukraine were actively courting the United States and have begun steps toward joining NATO.

This makes the Russian bear and Vladimir Putin, in particular, very upset. The threat to the gas supply in Europe (which passes through the Ukraine via pipeline) has already caused a noticeable spike in oil prices. Keep your eye on the price at the pump and don't be surprised to see it climb a little bit. It shouldn't be anything like the $4/ gallon we saw in 2008, but the downward trend is likely to stop and reverse until the Ukraine gives in to Russian demands and the gas flows unimpeded again.

With a strong Russian leadership in a natural gas cartel, then, would we expect that policies and supplies would be formed without political motivation? Or would we expect, as Russia's recent actions with both Georgia and the Ukraine have shown, that gas supply would become a weapon to be used to help dictate trading and military policy to the European Union and other US allies? I'd bet on the latter.

As for the US, we need only take Putin at his word that gas prices will increase dramatically. Although the US is a major gas producer as well, global prices will dictate US domestic prices to a large extent. If you are considering converting to natural gas heat, think twice. If the new cartel has its way, it may not seem like such a good idea in the not too distant future. On the other hand, renewable energy sources such as wind and solar are much harder to monopolize and as prices for other forms of energy continue to rise, green energy will not only become more competitive, but will help provide stable energy prices that are too a large degree immune from artificial supply constraints devised by foreign cartels to drive up the price.

Print this article with comments

This article has 12 comments:

  •  
    So called "renewable"sources of energy are enormous energy hogs in their production and installation phases...This may also seem like an impertinent reminder..but the sun doesn't always shine in South Dakota..and in some places there's not always wind blowing at the right time..And oh yeah..forgot to mention there is not much of a grid to actually take God's energy gift to us all to where it needs to go..or to store it...
    Also..again sorry..but nat gas is stil very much a regional (local) fuel. It costs very different amounts in very different places because its not so easy to move around. Just a little remonder also..people may not like those nasty Russians..but the gas IS theirs..just a minor point.

    Jan 06 10:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Russia is not a threat anymore as OIl/Gas is concerned, they are trying to bully in Ukraine ( there is pipeline that brings gas to Europe, about 25% of total demand ) and are showing up at OPEC but I think their mafia politicos are more busy now with coming default of government debt and their silly currency than with any cartels.
    Russia makes it's social unrest controlable at Oil above 100$ and all it's commodities 100% above the curent prices, I expect something terrible will happen in Russia very soon and it will make Oil/Gas cheaper as they are scrambling and begging to sell their hard stuff for dollars.
    Jan 06 10:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The author is certainly overstating his case!

    Our domestic price of natural gas is not likely to be influenced by any Russian cartel. Our supply is virtually all domestic and Canadian. What little we import is in the form of LNG, which is brought in to "backfeed" the piping systems because of pipeline capacity limitations.
    There is no reason to expect a supply deficiency in the near future. In fact the domestic suppliers such as Chesapeak are curtailing 2009 production.
    Jan 06 12:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Our natrual gas is just as localized and tamper proof as wind and solar and it also works. Electricity is bought and sold like any other commodity. Remember enron, what business were they in? It is hard for me to beleive that Green can replace the btu value of fossil. T.Boone Pickens as I remember was a corporate raider. Can he really be believed or does he just want another pile of money to raid as a
    CEO who can treat both investors and the gov't as patsies?



























    Jan 06 03:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The natural gas stocks seem to be seeing something. I don't know about the Russian thing, I didn't think gas was that fungible. But one thing occurs to me as a possible explanation for higher gas prices soon.

    North American gas production is divided between conventional and unconventional. Conventional peaked in 2001 and is in serious decline. The only thing that has been saving us from a gas debacle is the new shale and other unconventional plays, which are ramping up nicely. The problem with this new gas is that it's very drilling intensive. Between that and the higher drilling activity needed to get gas from declining conventional fields, gas drilling is going hyperbolic just to keep production flat. The American Petroleum Institute reported yesterday that domestic gas drilling cost for 2007 was up 105% over the previous record (2006). It's an accelerating treadmill that the gas producers are on. If anything were to happen to the new drilling efforts, the decline in production would be dramatic.

    Well guess what? Something HAS happened to these efforts. It's called the credit crunch! Drilling runs on debt to a large extent, and that fuel has dried up.
    Jan 06 06:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Most of what has transpired the past several months has been a reset of energy and commodity metrics to currency, particularly the dollar. This natural gas chatter is an important, and maybe smaller participant.
    Jan 06 10:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The shale plays, the Fayetteville, the Haynesville, the Marcellus, and others will keep the US well supplied of natural gas for the next decade. Also there is a lot of LNG supply that will come on over the next 5 years, so Russia will have some pricing power in Europe, but half of western Europe will get more of it's nat gas via LNG from Algeria, Nigeria, etc. This natural gas 'OPEC' formation is just a bunch of media hype.
    Jan 07 08:20 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    1977C, the only thing "terrible" that might happen in Russia soon is that they stop drinking vodka and start drinking water. Russia is potentially a very rich country that is filled with natural resources that other countries need, and the smartest thing that Europe and North America can do is to cooperate with them instead of trying to convince various know-nothings that the managerial class in that country are fools. Where natural gas is concerned the Russians knew what they were doing when that country called itself the Soviet Union. Moreover, had it not been for that dunce Ronald Reagan, larger pipelines would have been constructed to e.g. (West) Germany, and the present discussion about what Russia is prepared or not prepared to provide would not be taking place.

    Speaking of fools, a few months ago the US Ambassador to Sweden attempted to convince his hosts that Russia was launching some kind of imperialistic rampage where energy is concerned. What His Excellency convinced me of however was that it is a mistake to talk about things that neither you nor your advisors know anything about. He was concerned about the new Russian pipelines to Europe, but what he doesn't understand is that the Russians have the option of constructing them so that they run to China.

    Incidentally, half of the last paragraph in this article needs to be read several times and thought about. What does not need to be read is the part about wind and solar. These items are important and more of them are needed, but they are definitely on the second (or third) team where energy is concerned.
    Jan 07 08:39 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Thanks to recent discoveries, the U.S. now has over 100 YEARS of proven domestic reserves of NG. And this doesn't include the future production of known methane hydrates, which drawf our supplies of traditional NG. We may be the Saudi Arabia of wind, but we are assuredly way ahead of the Russians and anyone else in the world when it comes to the ability to mine natural gas.
    Jan 07 12:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oh, and the BEST PART is the overwhelming bulk of these reserves are not on public lands (TG!) or un-Green, so the Congress couldn't place a moratorium on its production (unlike oil shale, coal, nuclear, or the OCS) even if they wanted to.
    Jan 07 12:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Moreover, considering this geopolitically (and perhaps selfishly), such a Russian NG monopoly vis a vis Europe and Asia can only benefit the U.S. economically.
    Jan 07 12:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Not to mention it is the ONLY fuel source in the world that can BOTH operate transport and generate electricity in its natural state with minimal environmental consequences.
    Jan 07 12:22 PM | Link | Reply