Post-Panic REITs: Most Attractive Valuations in Decades 8 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Well-publicized real estate and credit market woes caused investors to stampede out of real estate securities during the financial panic. Despite a strong performance in December, U.S. REITs declined 38% in the fourth quarter of 2008, versus a 22% drop in the S&P 500.
Like global equities generally, real estate securities are now valued at their most attractive levels in decades. At the end of November, the yield on U.S. REIT indexes exceeded the 10% level for the first time since 1991, and the spread to the 10-year Treasury yield reached 7.25%, the highest since 1974.
At the end of December, the yield on U.S. REIT indexes was 8.8% and the spread to the 10-Year Treasury was 6.5%. Investors who have been underweight in this asset class may want to consider adding exposure to U.S. and foreign real estate ETFs.
[click images to enlarge]
U.S. REIT Index Performance Past 10 Years
Foreign Real Estate Index Performance Past 3 Years
Related Articles
|



























This article has 8 comments:
Otherwise healthy REITs are finding it impossible to do 'business as usual' when any substantial debt comes due.
I would only consider REITS that have little to no principal payments approaching in the next 5 years or so.
REITs were fueled the 3 biggest sins of the credit bubble era:
-Cheap credit
-Leverage
-Real estate
Pain in commercial real estate typically happens later during a recession. Lower rents and higher occupancies in world where the credit punch bowl is empty and leverage is a taboo will punish the sector.
The bonds may make sense for the stronger players. The stocks are still baking in Goldilocks.
And if the REIT sector does get aid they will end up like the financials. Tighter bond spreads because Uncle Sam is playing Uncle Socialist, but lower stock prices because the growth prospects and business model are impaired in the lower growh, less levered world.
On Jan 09 09:18 AM Equity Has No Clue wrote:
> This article is written by another kid/pundit trying to pick a bottom.
>
>
> REITs were fueled the 3 biggest sins of the credit bubble era:<br/>
>
> -Cheap credit
> -Leverage
> -Real estate
>
> Pain in commercial real estate typically happens later during a recession.
> Lower rents and higher occupancies in world where the credit punch
> bowl is empty and leverage is a taboo will punish the sector.
>
> The bonds may make sense for the stronger players. The stocks are
> still baking in Goldilocks.
>
> And if the REIT sector does get aid they will end up like the financials.
> Tighter bond spreads because Uncle Sam is playing Uncle Socialist,
> but lower stock prices because the growth prospects and business
> model are impaired in the lower growh, less levered world.
Delineating how they are cheap and high in yield ,
But there is no analysis pointing to why this cannot deteriorate further in value.
I'd bought a muni bond at par yielding 6.625% , and thought I'd got a bargain when it dropped to 90 and I bought more.
Now it's at 75.
Are commercial REITs going to continue to drop?
Certain sectors may make sense per low debt and good income despite being hammered ,
But a detailed analysis of these specific individual situations would be essential before making an entry decision,
Rather than a general synopsis.
"I would only consider REITS that have little to no principal payments
approaching in the next 5 years or so."
---- VERY GOOD advice!
"Bottom pickers" have been KILLED in REITs over the last few months still...