Obama Provides More Tailwinds for LED Lighting Manufacturers 15 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
- They use 40-70% less electricity according to the LED City Project.
- On average they burn up to 70,000 hours as compared to a life span of only 20,000 hours with more traditional incandescent or fluorescent bulbs.
- They put-off less heat and therefore a building's air conditioning system can provide cooling more efficiently while using less electricity.
- There are likely to be changed far less often.
- Traditional flourescent bulbs contain mercury and are treated as hazardous waste when it comes time to get rid of them. LED bulbs contain no mercury and are thus friendlier to the environment and hazardous disposal fees don't apply.
The two companies that Jon Najarian recommended for a bullish play on the future of LED lighting are Philips Electronics (PHG) and Cree, Inc. (CREE). To show that the market is catching on to the up-side possibilities, PHG and CREE both recently broke above their 50 day moving average.
If you have a preference to support American companies, Cree is based in North Carolina while Philips is based in Amsterdam. A recent press release by Cree highlights an upcoming project that will see 4,200 of their LED light fixtures installed in a section of the Pentagon that is undergoing renovation.
In choosing between the two companies, I would have to lean towards an investment in Cree because of the Pentagon project that they will soon have under their belt. More federal government buildings, potentially thousands more, seem to be a realistic new market for Cree now thanks to the new administration's upcoming stimulus package.
Disclosure: No position held
Related Articles
|



























This article has 15 comments:
Replacing streetlights or installing solar powered LED streetlights instead of conventional lights at government facilities could be one of the "shovel-ready" projects that would fit in the stimulus plan...
On Jan 12 03:58 AM IU12 wrote:
> If you did any research at all before posting this, you'd see that
> Philips Lumileds is the company you are referencing (a subsidiary
> company of Philips Electronics) which is based in San Jose, California
> (USA!!!).
It's a tough world for Green Conservatives!
On Jan 12 04:34 PM Universal Huckleberry wrote:
> Obama? Obama gives a speech and his name leads the headlines... but
> he can't really DO anything, yet. Meanwhile, it's the current Administration
> that actually implemented the energy efficiency measure at the Pentagon-
> the more accurate title to this article should be "Bush Provides
> More Tailwinds For LED Lighting Manufacturers"! I know about 500
> liberal investors probably just fought back a gag reflex, but let's
> give credit where it's due.
>
> It's a tough world for Green Conservatives!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
On Jan 12 11:19 AM 1Poordog wrote:
> Is there any movement towards LED lighting to replace the incandesant
> bulbs in the home?... I dislike the light intensity/color from the
> newer long life-neon tube bulbs on the market. And the retail homeowner
> would be a far larger market.