The Cult of Peter Schiff - Is It Deserved? 21 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
It’s hard to look at Peter Schiff with anything other than awe.
After all, the 44 year-old president of Euro Pacific Capital was mocked on networks like CNBC and Fox for predicting “wild” things like a real estate bust, a credit crunch, and a deep recession. Two years later, and Schiff’s original prophecies have come true.
That validation has been earning Schiff some much-deserved credibility in the financial world, where until now he’s been dismissed as overly pessimistic. “Schiff has suddenly emerged as a cult hero and something of a minor celebrity,” said Fortune’s Brian O’Keefe in a recent article.
According to the article, Schiff, a broker, even recently applied to become, “a licensed investment advisor so that he can actively manage clients' money for the first time.”
Schiff’s Painful Performance in 2008
But does Schiff really deserve the acclaim he’s gotten found recently?
While Schiff has proved himself as an economist, his ability to parlay those predictions into profits for his clients was questionable for 2008. For the last few years, he’s been betting big on overseas investments and precious metals – two areas that got hit as hard or harder than the S&P last year.
According to Morningstar, the average international equity fund performed 7% worse than the average U.S. stock fund in the last year.
Just look at the iShares MSCI Belgium (EWK), the worst performing ETF last year according to SmartMoney.com, or the iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 ETF (FXI), which lost 49% in 2008.
Another of Schiff’s investment strategies has been to exit the U.S. dollar in favor of more fundamentally sound currencies. This too has proved untimely since anxious treasury investors have driven up the dollar in the last year.
And some, like Seeking Alpha contributor Todd Sullivan, are quick to remind investors that Peter Schiff has been bearish on the market since at least 2002, when the S&P was poised to move up 48% over the next five years.
Follow the Money Trail
Just because Schiff’s favored investments didn’t do well doesn’t mean that others’ investments didn’t. Just look at former hedge fund manager Andrew Lahde, whose real estate fund made 866% last year by betting that defaults would rise (Note: Lahde’s anti-industry farewell polemic is definitely worth reading).
Likewise, a lot of individual investors did well in 2008 by betting against the market – the ProShares UltraShort S&P (SDS) and Direxion Financial Bear 3X ETF (FAZ) are a couple examples of exchange traded funds that returned deep in the double digits.
Making Money in 2009
If you’re still trying to decide where to put your money in 2009, you’re not alone. While the market’s a lot less volatile than it was six months ago, it’s still wild enough to give pause to even the most decisive investors right now.
That said, I think Warren Buffett’s on the money buying undervalued American stocks (though I don’t agree with some of his recent choices). It’s a strategy that made these subscribers 15% in 2008, after all.
Now, I don’t think Schiff should be written off – he took a risky stance against CNBC’s perpetual bulls, and it paid off. He’s also helped to bring attention to some of our country’s very real financial problems. That’s something he should be congratulated for.
We’ll see where his investments go in the future, but it doesn’t look like his opinions are wavering for the time being.
He said in the Fortune article:
My problem has always been that I see things too clearly and too far in advance. Other people don't understand what I do, so the markets might not validate what I'm saying right away. But they will eventually.
Disclosure: SDS is a long position in the Rhino Stock Report’s model portfolio.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
David Fry
-
2
TraderMark
-
3
Don Dion
-
4
Cliff Wachtel
-
5
Mike Havrilla
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
Top
StockTalkers.-
1
David Fry
-
2
Cliff Wachtel
-
3
Mike Havrilla
-
4
David White
-
5
Hedged In
Top StockTalkers » -
1
Also you mentioned the Lahde fund without mentioning that I gave Andy the seed capital to start his fund when no one else would. The original investors in that fund were all Euro Pacific clients.
2002 comes straight from the article that's referenced in that paragraph. I think that the ensuing comments do a good enough job of arguing timeline. This article is more about 2008 performance.
For everything hinges on interest rates. The queer ZIRP system set up in Japan has unbalanced everything in strange and horrible ways. This created the Japanese carry trade. The unwinding of this 'carry trade' is now monumental. It began in July, 2007. Each year, as one central bank after another falls into the Japanese ZIRP system, the unwinding gets worse and worse.
Making money off of this unwinding is very difficult since it is DESTROYING WEALTH. ZIRP won't retrieve wealth. Why is this?
The Derivatives Beast: this insurance/hedging system unwittingly hooked itself into the central bank interest rate manipulation system [derivatives are openly based on this system] and since the central banks openly manipulate interest rates, this means, all the people who are 'inside' the system have utterly warped it. That is, Citigroup's people, the guys running JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, etc.
Their insider knowledge coupled with their wild attempts to always make profits even when wealth is being destroyed has so unbalanced the systems, it is all now crashing down like a house built on a solid foundation and then the residents dig out the foundation and put it on the roof! Picture that!
There is no way to stop this crash. Only after all the illicit wealth built up by previous speculation vanishes, will this crash end. Then, we must build a BALANCED TRADE system, not the grossly unbalanced one with the US sucking up nearly a trillion in trade overruns. Right now, we are far, far from fixing the fundamental problems of free trade.
This is Elaine Supkis of emsnews. Thank you.
Thanks to Peter & his brokers I have a porfolio in place that is performing quite well (up approx 11% with dividends rolling in) and great exposure to precious metals.
When the dust settles, I like my chances.
This inherent bias, even conflict of interest, by the mainstream media has contributed to the stock bubbles of the late 90's and 2006/2007. Many innocent people were sucked in and lost much of their savings.
The public needs to hear all points of view, and the way Peter Schiff was being ridiculed in 2006/2007 on mainstream TV was apalling. I don't personally agree with all of Peter Schiff's bearish views, but the investing public need to hear all points of view to be able to reach their own conclusions.
I distinctly remember watching Tout TV, as Gary North calls it, in 2005-07, even into '08, and hearing predictions of Dow 20000 and up, that real estate was still tremendously undervalued, etc. But Peter is a follower of Austrian economics and understood that the whole thing was a speculative bubble, while his detractors laughed and sneered. The fact that Peter is not clairvoyant about market time should not now detract from his ability to correctly call macro trends.
Were his predictions about the emergence of Asia really that far off? If the central banks of China etc. ever wise up and stop buying American debt, as they may be doing now, all of the predictions in Crash Proof may become reality much faster than most people could imagine.
This best picks a person could have made in 07 was not to pick what people on TV told you to.
There is even a website dedicated to getting him to run for Senate.
schiff2010.com/
Don't look at Peter Schiff or any other financial economist with awe. Read his (their) books and articles and try to understand them.
Nobody has a crystal ball for reading the future, unless they are wearing a pointed hat with stars on in. And anyone who finds him/herself looked on with awe should run for the exit.
He was just one of many who have come and gone, who will be followed by many more. They appear to be prescient and attract droves of followers, but alas, it turns out that they are "soothsayers" but for a limited time only, and not always. Bummer.
Why is it that they always fade out? Well, obviously, because they weren't really Gurus at all. They were just lucky for awhile.
There are even some around today, and if you were to get into a time machine and jump into the future, you would find them there. They would have predicted, for example, say... the bottom of the Great Recession in late 2008 (or 2009, or 2010, or...whenever it was.) There they are...the Gurus..and they were right!
Except they weren't. They were lucky. How they saw the future happened to be somewhat correct. You think this correlation means something?
Well, lets say it does. The question now becomes how do I find a Guru before
we all discover he was right, which will too late to take advantage of his "predictions." There are lots of Gurus around making their prognostacations; but which one is going to be right? If you think about this for awhile, you'll realize you can't ever know. How can you possibly know ahead of time which "Guru" will be right in the future, unless... you are a Guru, too! In that case you don't need one, do you? Just listen to yourself. But you know you're not a Guru. So, its impossible to pick one out ahead of time, unless you are lucky, of course.
So after their "predictions" come true, we know who they are, but not before. Bummer.
The problem is, if we then follow what they say, are they going to be right again? Jo Grandville was "right" for awhile, and then he wasn't. Peter Schiff was right, it seems, for awhile, if you give him a lot of leeway time wise, and now recently has been wrong again. But in there for awhile he just knew that future...didn't he?
Well, I've got great news for all. Here's a way to find a Guru who can pick the direction of the DOW 10 times in a row! So he's got to be right on the 11th, too, right?
Get a thousand people in a big room (or web site, maybe) to pick whether the Dow will be up or down tomorrow. The next day we will find that about half will be right. Keep only those in the group who were correct. Then repeat for nine more days. One or two people will be left who will have been correct for ten days in a row!
This is what pure chance gives us: people who stand out and appear to "know something" and methods which appear to "predict." But its all just a coincidence. And you have to have a strong desire for the truth in order to be objective enough to see past you're own rose colored glasses, which gives us a view of reality that really says far more about us in this present moment - our desires, our agendas, our beliefs, etc., than it ever will say about the future.
George Soros - up 10% 2008
Nassim Taleb - up 55-110% 2008
On Jan 26 07:27 AM Peter Schiff wrote:
> Why do you guys keep picking 2002 as the first year I became bearish
> on U.S. stocks? I was also bearish in 1999, so why not pick that
> date? It is unfair to say I first got bearish in 2002 simply because
> that year marked a significant market bottom. However, it is important
> that the markets that I was bullish on in 2002, foreign stocks, commodities,
> oil, gold, foreign currencies, etc all outperformed the U.S. market
> until 2008.
>
> Also you mentioned the Lahde fund without mentioning that I gave
> Andy the seed capital to start his fund when no one else would.
> The original investors in that fund were all Euro Pacific clients.
>