Baltic Dry Index: The Best Economic Indicator You've Never Heard of 31 comments
January 30, 2009
| about: SPY
Submit
an article to
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Both Dennis Gartman and Larry Kudlow have reported recently on the recovery in the London-based Baltic Dry Index (BDI), "an assessment of the price of moving the major raw materials by sea. Taking in 26 shipping routes measured on a timecharter and voyage basis, the index covers Handymax, Panamax, and Capesize dry bulk carriers carrying a range of commodities including coal, iron ore and grain."
A few years back, Slate Magazine called BDI the "The best economic indicator you've never heard of."
The chart above displays the BDI over the last three months, and shows the strong 34% increase in the BDI since its low in mid-December. Could this be a recovery "mustard seed?"
Related Articles
|






















A tanker was bought by SBLK for around the price of the Charter last year. Since these puppies not only are very expensive to build but also use a heck of a lot of raw materials, its no wonder that steel demands simply dried up.
The big problem the shippers with Long term charters have is that there are early cancellation clauses in many contracts. They get a cancellation payment but a $100K charter winds up on the spot market which is running around $14K, operating costs are around $8 K, at least for SBLK.
A big plus for new oil tankers will be the removal of single hull competition by the end of 2009. That is good for carriers like NAT and TNK.
Scrap steel anyone?
The chart by Mr Perry is a typically disingenous attempt by the author to slap lipstick on a pig in hopes of painting a rosy picture of the world economy as reflected in dry bulk rates... it fails to make note of the fact that the BDI at 1070 today is STILL down more than 90% from its May 20, 2008 high around 11,600.
It also fails to reflect the fact that many (most?) dry bulk shippers are, or are about to be, called on the carpet by their banks for failure to meet minimum loan covenants... and that the shipping companies' balance sheets are in terrible shape due to collapsing ship values which are in turn triggering fears of impending loan defaults and covenant breaches.
Many ships are merely lying at anchor in Greece and other areas with no work whatsoever, not even spot work.
Take a look at DRYS this week (and since May 2008) if you want to see the REAL picture of what is happening in this industry. Here is the chart, representing a fall from $115 to 6 today:
stockcharts.com/h-sc/u...
Despite some cancellations of newbuilds (at high penalty to the shippers who ordered them), there is still a very large supply of newbuilds in progress in the world's shipyards, and they will be filling a weak demand market over the next couple of years. High supply of ships, low demand for cargoes and collapsing ship values is not a recipe for a healthy prognosis for the dry bulkers at present.
Thanks for the link. The latest BDI value I get from the chart is about 1030. The value at the bottom is, I believe, 666 (thanks jegan). The high earlier in 2008 was around 12,300 (from the patio link). That means we have had a drop to the bottom of about 95% (thanks paultaut) and a rebound of about 3% of that 2008 high. Dead cats bounce higher than this.
On Jan 30 08:47 AM patio wrote:
> www.bloomberg.com/apps...;exch=IND&x=15...
>
>
> Oh, there is no question, my, what a recovery!
I don't understand the +34% on your graph. I calculate the rise from the bottom as approximately 55% of the bottom value (about 666). No matter what the value actually is, I don't think it is significant, because a rise from 666 to about 1030 is miniscule compared to the drop from the 2008 high above 12,000.
Can you comment further?
stockology.blogspot.co...
I also correctly warned about DRYS and urged folks to swtch from DRYS to EXM. It was a very timely warning of caution on DRYS. Look at what happened today!
seekingalpha.com/artic...
On Jan 30 01:42 PM Mark Anthony wrote:
> The Bottom of BDI index was indeed 666, an easy to remember number.
> It happend on Dec. 4, 08 (12/4/8, half of which is 6/6/6). I called
> it perfectly and I loaded boat loads of DRYS near the bottom:
>
> stockology.blogspot.co...
>
>
> I also correctly warned about DRYS and urged folks to swtch from
> DRYS to EXM. It was a very timely warning of caution on DRYS. Look
> at what happened today!
> seekingalpha.com/artic...
>
I haven't looked at it since I spotted a news release from TK that Frontline(FRO) added 2 suezmax vessels to it.
At the time, it was 36 SZs strong.
It would be wise for investors to keep an eye on this index. Its a leading indicator.
www.marketoracle.co.uk...
I had DRYS as a trade from $5.6.-$6.50 or so and exited, and recently got stopped out of EXM with a 2% loss so I have been interested.
One other real concern, is what was mentioned earlier about the survivorship of some of these dry bulk shippers with broken covenants and lack of credit/lending. When blood goes into the water the surviving sharks will be even stronger and good to profit from.
Steel is another shipped commodity to watch - China infrastructure requirements will be great and the last report I read they were shutting and limiting domestic production.
When these companies ships come off charters and reset, there will be a tremendous hit to earnings and forecasts. Traders can trade, but investors might wait to see what happens when earnings are announced. brs-paris.com provides the ship orders and expected delivery.
Oil tankers do not make up the BDI index.
The BDI does not act in sympathy with Tanker rates, it is an actual indicator of rates paid for Bulk only.
These disruptions caused a huge swing in the BDI which was not a reflection of the overall economy.
The metals experts believe copper will go to $15 in future years. By way of comparison, gold would need to climb to $9,000 (!) to match such a gain.