We evaluated Student Transportation Inc. (STB) as an investment during the fall of 2011. We were intrigued by its high yield of 8%, however we were displeased by the fact that the company was guzzling gas for acquisitions and increased capital expenditures. We were not foolhardy enough to recommend an outright short sale of the company because we felt that the 8% dividend yield was supporting the price of the shares. We also believed that dividend hungry investors didn't know or didn't care that the company's biggest source of cash inflows was debt and equity issuance rather than free cash flows from business operations. STB's dividend yield is now 8.6% and it remains to be seen if its reduced appetite for acquisitions will pay dividends for shareholders.
When we first considered STB as an investment in 2011, we determined that it would be an underperformer relative to the major indexes such as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq composite. Based on its performance since it registered on the Nasdaq on September 6th, 2011, we can see that our expectations about STB being an underperformer back in September have come to pass as STB's recent share price of $6.50 for its Nasdaq shares is slightly lower than the $7 it fetched when it went on the Nasdaq on September 6th, 2011. However, we give credit where and when credit is due and we believe that STB's recent record of increased financial discipline has helped it outperform the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq in the first few weeks of 2011
Source: Morningstar Direct
STB generated 18% total year-over-year revenue growth during its most recent quarter and is targeting 15% for the full FY 2013 period. STB's adjusted EBITDA was $28.4M and it increased by $5.76M in Q2 2013 versus Q2 2012's adjusted EBITDA of $23.66M. STB's net profit increased to $3M in the quarter versus $1.3M in last year's comparable quarter and this was primarily due to operating margin improvements. STB's improved operating margin in Q2 2013 versus Q2 2012 was primarily due to reduced equity-based compensation, the absence of $373K in acquisition expenses and slow growth in general and administrative expenses in relation to revenue growth. EPS increased to $.04 in Q2 2013 from $.02 in Q2 2012.
BUSINESS SEGMENT REVIEW
STB's Oil and Gas Segment's revenue increased from $1.3M in Q2 2012 to $1.5M in Q2 2013 due to higher oil and gas commodity prices. The 13.3% increase in segment revenues was aided by 0% operating expense growth. H1 2013 revenues and profits declined on a year-over-year because the natural gas market did not reach its bottom until around April 2012. We keep in mind that this segment accounts for 1%-2% of STB's annual revenues. We expect H2 2013 to benefit from stronger natural gas prices and easier comparisons versus H2 2012.
STB's School Bus Transportation Segment
Revenue: STB's School Bus Transportation Segment is the core business of the company. The segment saw its revenue increase by $18.1M and reached $117.9M in Q2 2013. This represented a 18.1% increase from Q2 2012 and it was primarily due to a full year's worth of revenue contributions from 7 acquisitions in 2012 as well as 9 new bid contracts. Acquisitions and bid-in contract revenue accounted for $19.4M in incremental revenue, contract rate increases and net increases in service requirements added $0.7M. These revenue growth streams were aided by $0.7M in positive impacts from the translation of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars and were partially offset by $2.7M in revenue deferrals associated with the reduction in school days during the quarter due to Superstorm Sandy. On balance, we would still strongly prefer to see the company breakout further the incremental revenue from acquisitions and the incremental revenue from new contract bids and the reason is so it can aid us in determining how much is from acquisitions and how much is from the new bids.
Source: STB's Q4 2012 MD&A and Q2 2013 MD&A
Costs of Operations: Unfortunately for STB's School Bus Transportation Segment, its acquisition strategy has not generated operating leverage as Q2 2013's costs of operations increased by $13.7M (19.4%) versus Q2 2012 levels. This was due to the inclusion of the aforementioned acquisitions as well as new contracts. Driver's wages as a percentage of revenue increased by 10bp and maintenance wages as a percentage of revenue increased by 20bp in the first six months of FY 2013. We were disappointed that on a percentage of revenues basis, operating expenses increased by 40bp due to an additional year of vehicle leasing expenses. However, we were pleased to note that fuel costs decreased by $400K in Q2 2013 versus Q2 2012 and declined by 20bp as a percentage of revenue in Q2 2013 (8.9%) versus Q2 2012 (9.1%).
General and Admin Expenses: We are pleased to see STB achieve positive operating leverage with regards to its General and Admin expenses. STB's General and Admin expenses for the segment were $10.3M in Q2 2013, an increase of $1M (10.8%) versus last year. This incremental expense was due to new business for the company and the rest of this Admin expense growth was due to acquisitions completed in 2012 and STB's nine new bid-in contracts. At least the company can make the claim that its General and Admin expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased by 60bp in Q2 2013 versus prior year levels.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses: Although STB's transportation related depreciation and amortization expenses increased at a faster rate than its revenues in Q2 2013 versus Q2 2012, we are content that its revenue growth rate (18.1%) was only 80bp below its increase in depreciation and amortization. In Q2 2013, STB's depreciation and amortization expenses for its transportation operations increased by $2.1M versus the prior year's levels and reached $13.2M.
Non-Cash Equity Compensation Expenses: We were pleased that Non-Cash equity compensation expense decreased by 24.6% in Q2 2013 ($2M) versus Q1 2012 ($2.6M) though we're not happy that this expense was nearly 19% as much as the company's Q2 2013 pro forma operating income. We still don't think that management should be adding back this expense to Adjusted EBITDA because the Class B shares granted to executives are putable and the company has spent $16.5M since 2007 repurchasing Class B shares from management. In H1 2013, the company granted 406,041 Class B Series Three shares worth $2.8M as of the applicable grant dates to STB's management and $1.4M worth of STB's Class B Series Three shares were put back by STB's management pursuant to the terms of the plan. Considering that this non-cash equity compensation represents over 1.5% of the company's operating expenses even though it is a low-margin generating, highly indebted company, we think that STB should ease back share issuance under this program.
CORPORATE FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT
Although STB's net capital expenditures and payments on debt due to the former owners of its many acquisitions increased from $16.65M in H1 2012 to $18.11 in H1 2013, we were pleased that its operating cash flow for H1 2013 was $6M and was well above the $-3.6M incurred in H1 2012. STB converted its remaining $22.4M of its 7.5% convertible bond issue (2014) and issued 4.35M shares at $5.15/share. We are aware that the company's business model is seasonal and based on the academic year and if STB can generate $22M in OCFs in Q3 2013 and Q4 2013 it will have generated $50M in operating cash flows for FY 2013 and this would eclipse its previous record of $44M established in 2010. We hope that the company refrains from its previous track record of frenetic acquisition and continues its focus on bolstering profitability from current operations because its dividend payout ratio as a percentage of free cash flows (Operating Cash Flows minus Net CapEx) may be less than 100% this year, assuming it doesn't make any additional CapEx purchases.
Source: FactSet Marquee
In conclusion, though we still believe that STB is overvalued relative to our fair value target, the company still offers an 8.6% dividend yield. We were pleased that the company's profitability and free cash flows showed a marked improvement versus prior year's levels. This is not the first time we've said anything nice with regards to STB's performance. We felt that as recently as May that STB would be able to potentially grow into its valuation and that its fundamental value had the chance to converge with its market price. Although we don't believe that the yield is suitable enough relative to the risks associated with the company as of right now, we are carefully evaluating the company to see if the company's management is willing to pause its acquisition and capital expenditure spree. If STB's management continued its focus on improving the ROIC, Net Income and Free Cash Flow results of the company, we think it would be a great idea for income oriented investors. However, we will need to see more than two quarters out of the company in order to conclude that it has changed its focus from growth-at-any cost to a more sustainable financial model.