Seeking Alpha

Trade Radar Operator


About this author:

It's been about a week and a half since I wrote the first Tech Bellwether Earnings Scorecard post. Since we are still in the midst of a busy earnings season, I thought it was time for an update.

Below I have listed some of the big names in the tech world along with comments on whether they beat expectations, posted losses or gains and whether they provided positive forward guidance.

CompanyEarningsComments
VMWare (VMW)revs up 42%, earnings beat by $0.10weak guidance
Texas Instruments (TXN)beats by $0.09guides well below consensus, announces layoffs
EMCprofits down 40% year-over-yearno guidance offered
Altera (ALTR)down 12% sequentially but beats by $0.01,guidance: next Q earnings down 15-25%
Sun (JAVA)beats lowered expectations (non-GAAP positive earnings of $0.10 vs GAAP loss of $0.28)provides no guidance
Yahoo (YHOO)posts loss, revenue down a bit y-o-y but beats on non-GAAP basisQ1 guidance light, no full year guidance offered
Qualcomm (QCOM)beats on revenues and misses on pro forma earnings by $0.16reduces guidance
Citrix (CTXS)misses by $0.14weak guidance and announced layoffs of 10% of workforce
Teradyne (TER)missweak outlook, laying off 14% of workforce
Lam Research (LRCX)missguides next quarter down 38%, shutdowns and salary reductions
Symantec (SYMC)beats top and bottom lineno info on guidance
Broadcom (BRCM)misses by $0.19offers weak Q1 guidance, announces job cuts of 3% of workforce
KLA-Tencor (KLAC)miss, non-GAAP loss twice as bad as expectedno guidance offered
CAbeats by $0.05 on non-GAAP basisguidance flat
Juniper (JNPR)meets on EPS, revs lightno guidance offered
Amazon (AMZN)beats by $0.13good guidance
Applied Material (AMAT)miss: projects sales down 35%, $0.09 lossreduces Q1 outlook, considers cost-cutting, shutdowns
Sandisk (SNDK)revs beat, earnings miss by wide marginpoor guidance
Motorola (MOT)misses by a lot: revs down, earnings down moresuspends dividend,offers weak guidance

As in the first post, the majority of companies are not doing too well and have low expectations. Whereas the last post could point to a few companies that provided good guidance, this week's sampling has only one - Amazon. The other companies either withdrew guidance entirely or offered weak guidance.

So does that mean tech stocks are plunging? Far from it.

Below is the chart of XLK, the Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF. Rather that showing a serious decline, it is more or less muddling along in a trading range and even closed above its 50-day MA today.


Even more startling is the following chart. This shows XLK in relation to SPY, the S&P 500 SPDR ETF.


It can be seen that tech is clearly outperforming the S&P 500. Given that the S&P 500 is weighed down with banks, I checked the performance of XLK relative to the Russell 3000 (using IWV, the iShares Russell 3000 Index ETF that attempts to capture the performance of the broad U.S. equity market) and the out-performance of XLK is even more pronounced. In IWV, tech is the second largest sector, comprising 14.6% of the ETF's holdings and yet tech by itself is still out-performing.

So it appears we are in a mode here where the bad news is being ignored and tech is turning into the "go to" sector. This kind of thing always makes me uncomfortable. I tend to like to see a bit of logic at work in the cause and effect of market movements. Here, though, the logic escapes me. Is it just the "tech stocks are cheap" thesis? Given what management is saying about the prospects for their businesses, it seems to me that tech stocks will soon get cheaper.

Disclosure: none

Print this article with comments

This article has 2 comments:

  •  
    I also watch in amazing given the continued deterioration in fundamentals contrasting the continued strength in charts. I bought tech last fall, esp chips, expecting a comparable bottom (in fundamentals) near Oct 2002. The thinking was the tech overbuild last time seemed to be avoided this time, yet the financial wreckage would offset. It wasn't possible to tell which would be stronger. And INTC last fall initially indicated moderate decline (10/15/08 - Intel's Surprisingly Sunny Earnings Report). Then the crap hit the fan and fundamentals deteriorated dramatically vs previous troughs. Yet the stocks hold up. I sold all tech near year end (too early) but I'm not buying cause the charts are going up, while fundamentals indicate the opposite.
    Feb 04 11:14 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Why do companies like this think that they can 'get away' with no Guidance on business levels? They must have firm plans on this because those plans are needed to gauge infrastructure, staffing, supply chain, etc.

    They have 'Guidance', but they don't want to chance a stock-crash if they miss.

    They need stronger high-leadership to establish confident objectives that generate confident Guidance.
    Feb 10 05:18 PM | Link | Reply