What's an American Car These Days? 24 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
We've heard a lot lately about the “Buy American” provisions being debated in the economic stimulus bill, and that made me think about how increasingly difficult, and increasingly meaningless, it is to even determine what "Buy American" really means in an increasingly globalized world economy. Consider automobiles - how do you tell the difference any more between "American cars" and "foreign cars."
1. Here's a list of 8 "American-made" vehicles produced by American UAW workers, in American factories, but for foreign-based car companies. If you purchased one of these vehicles, would that count as "buying American"?
American-made UAW vehicles:
- Mazda 6
- Mitsubishi (MITEY.PK) Eclipse
- Mitsubishi Galant
- Toyota (TM) Corolla
- Isuzu i-Series Truck
- Mazda B-series Truck
- Mitsubishi Raider Truck
- Toyota Tacoma Truck
2. What about these nine Canadian-made vehicles, produced by UAW brothers and sisters at factories in Canada, for the U.S.-based Detroit Three. They can't qualify as "American-Made" can they?:
Canadian-made UAW vehicles:
- Buick Lacrosse
- Chevrolet Impala
- Chrysler 300
- Dodge Challenger
- Dodge Charger
- Ford (F) Crown Victoria
- Lincoln Town Car
- Mercury Grand Marquis
- Pontiac Grand Prix
3. What about the Chevy Aveo, which is built by Korean automaker Daewoo for Detroit-based General Motors (GM)? Or the Chrysler PT Cruiser, built in Mexico?
4. What about the 2008 Honda (HMC) Pilot and Honda Civics, built in the U.S. with higher domestic content (70%) than the 2008 Dodge Ram (68%) and the Michigan-built Ford Mustang (65%).
5. What about the Toyota Tundra, Toyota Sienna and Honda Odyssey, which rank #5, #6 and #7 for the "Top American-Made Cars" in 2008 by Cars.com?
Related Articles
|




















If you actually believe that the cars from Detroit are what they always have been, then you must not work in the industry. The imported content in Detroit's cars has been raising steadily for decades now, and as written, many of them have a lower domestic content than do import branded cars. And since the former big 3 no longer make profits, you can't argue that it's all about where the profits go. There are none!
GM recently announced its "Centers for Excellence," being the GM facilities around the world that will develop its future vehicles. These involve the high paying, highly technical engineering skills that we should seek to keep in the US. While GM's trucks will continue to be developed here, NONE of its future car platforms will be designed or developed in the USA.
Ford's plan for the future? Move production of European developed cars to North America. We retain some assembly line work, but again the skilled jobs will be in Europe.
Chrysler's future? Sell itself to the Italians.
On Feb 09 06:58 AM Detfan wrote:
> American cars are what they always have been. A car purchased thru
> GM, Ford or Chysler. Nothing has changed. Profits still go to the
> home country when you buy from anyone else. People who are buying
> imports continue to weaken the manufacturing complex in this country.
> Plus, because you can now choose a GM, Ford, or Chysler car, and
> have it be equal or superior to the import, you can buy American
> with confidence these days. Why doesn't our government force Japan
> to open their market (3rd largest in the world) to U.S. cars? Free
> trade is only free if its equal.
If you want to really annoy a Canadian worker, just say he belongs to the UAW.
"2. What about these nine Canadian-made vehicles, produced by UAW brothers and sisters at factories in Canada, for the U.S.-based Detroit Three. They can't qualify as "American-Made" can they?:
Canadian-made UAW vehicles:
* Buick Lacrosse
* Chevrolet Impala
* Chrysler 300
* Dodge Challenger
* Dodge Charger
* Ford (F) Crown Victoria
* Lincoln Town Car
* Mercury Grand Marquis
* Pontiac Grand Prix
And Miken is right, many of US company cars are being made partially or completely overseas. If you want to bash overseas businesses being competitive bash the US auto companies too. If you want to bad overseas cars then get ready to pay $40,000 for a piece of junk unless you buy a Japanese car built in America (ironically they do it because a US auto worker is cheaper than in Japan).
In addition, I've always told my kids to make the best of what you have, live within your means, but keep your eye open for opportunity to better yourself by making efforts to do so. Not everyone has the same talents or academic abilities, another reason for a union to help provide a worker some measure of dignity no matter what his job position. . If you keep looking at the other guy, making comparisons, and being competitive for money, you will either be unhappy or an arrogant blowhard that no one wants to be around (except others like you).
This country needs to take care of it's own as other countries have for years. Instead of criticizing and and forming narrow minded opinions, we need to see how the rest of the world is handling this financial crisis. And Kman, I applaud you for your moving into the electrical field. Ir does require a lot of sacrifice to travel and move around a lot. I have a friend that did electrical contract work as you are. But he decoded to eventually work for a local contractor for less pay and a weekly paycheck to be with his kids and family. We need to be mindful of other people's circumstances and respect their decisions.
Also by leaving some small details out the writer knows that conclusions are left to the interpetations.
For every one (1) assembly line worker there are 16 at the powertrain plants, the metal fabricating plants, and the supplier plants.
Is it American if it was assembled in California or Texas,or Alabama if 70% of the components came from Japan, or Korea ?
Is it Canadian if it is assembled in Canada with 70% American components?
I don't like to export Dollars. it comes down to imports / exports. Dollars leaving this country do not return. They are replaced by IOUs and Deficits. The relationships we have with Canada are much more on an equal level than those with Japan , China, and Korea.
>>>
Far from true. Many of the worst mileage vehicles in the EPA's list are foreign brands. And on a car-for-car basis, Detroit typically beats the Japanese brands in mileage (not to say they are the better car). Japan's pickups all get poorer mileage than do Detroit's.
Since Toyota introduced the Prius to the US market, its CAFE (fleet average mileage) numbers have DECREASED. Why? Because Toyota sold far more guzzling trucks than it did hybrids. It just doesn't publicize those facts.
>>>
And the US government does the same for our auto industry. Try doing some research on USCAR and PNGV. These were government research projects aimed at funneling tax money directly into the Detroit auto makers (Japanese companies need not apply). The goal was to get them to produce high mileage cars. Ford, GM and Chrysler all produced the required concept car, cashed our check, and went back to building SUVs.
Toyota had wanted in, but once shuned by us, they went home and developed their hybrid drive system (which had started as a US concept!).
And I hope you realize that Germans buying an Opel benefits an American corporation, not a German one.
" >----- And the US government does the same for our auto industry. Try doing some research on USCAR and PNGV. These were government research projects aimed at funneling tax money directly into the Detroit auto makers (Japanese companies need not apply). The goal was to get them to produce high mileage cars. Ford, GM and Chrysler all produced the required concept car, cashed our check, and went back to building SUVs.
Toyota had wanted in, but once shuned by us, they went home and developed their hybrid drive system (which had started as a US concept!). " >
This is old news. And the Big 3 did produce many hi mpg vehicles. Where do you think Ford Focus and Chevrolet Cobalt XFE came from? And the Japanese jumped on the band wagon , or tried to, with big SUVs and pickup trucks. And yes, it was foolish for GM to sell it's electric vehicle/battery technology to an oil company and then on to Toyota. So isn't that proof that GM wanted clean and green electrics back in the early 90's? And who bought them? They had to do leases and that's what they got for being foresighted.
Also, the kind of protectionist support that goes on in Japan, Europe, and now especially China isn't near what US companies have benefited from. You folks just don't seem to get it. I guess it's ok to support the troops in dubious military ventures ( no disrespect intended and I am a vet), but when it comes to supporting American business and workers stomp on 'em hard. What an attitude.
Also, the kind of protectionist support that goes on in Japan, Europe, and now especially China isn't near what US companies have benefited from. You folks just don't seem to get it. I guess it's ok to support the troops in dubious military ventures ( no disrespect intended and I am a vet), but when it comes to supporting American business and workers stomp on 'em hard. What an attitude.>>>t...
Yeah, USCAR and PNGV are old news. Tax dollars were funnelled into Detroit to cover thier costs in developing high mileage cars which were supposed to be then launched to production. Detroit took out money, did the development part, showed the concepts, but never produced the cars. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.
As for protectionism, please tell us who is the largest selling car brand in China? Hint: it's initials are G and M. And which brands are amongst the top five in Europe? Try Ford and GM.
What country slaps a 25% tariff on any imported truck? Try USA.
Now tell me about protectionism.
If you think import tariffs are the way to prevent unsafe product from reaching the consumer, then I'm done with this dialog.
BTW, the Ford Focus and Cobalt XFE did not evolve from any taxpayer funded research. They are simply a slight tweaking (engine tune and gear ratio) of Detroit's existing compact cars. Both of which are badly outdated and overdue for replacement.