Another Round of Farcical Congressional Hearings 17 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The latest round of congressional hearings was just another instance of Congress pretending to do something of value, whilst also demonstrating their astounding ignorance about the current financial crisis:
(From Reuters): "WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Wall Street bank executives squirmed under a public scolding in the U.S. Congress on Wednesday over how they used $176 billion in bailout money without noticeably improving the battered economy…
...They demanded to know what the banks have done with the bailout money, given an ongoing credit crisis that has added to the country's deteriorating economy.
New York Democratic Rep. Gary Ackerman said that in "the real world,' people cannot get loans to buy cars or homes or send children to college.
"It seems to me and some of us that this money hasn't reached the street, that you haven't loaned it out," he said.
Democratic Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania was equally baffled, telling the executives that if their banks did not use the money, "Please find a way to return that money before you leave town."
South Carolina Republican Rep. Gresham Barrett said his constituents "simply have not seen the evidence that the money you were given is working or making their lives better."
(From the WSJ): "You created this mess we're in and now you're saying, "sorry -- trust us and by the way we don't even want the money,'" said Rep. Michael Capuano (D., Mass.) "America doesn't trust you anymore. Get our money back on the street."
After reading various articles on the hearings I can't help but wonder if we're heading down another path of misguided behavior similar to that which created the credit bubble in the first place. I say this because it appears as if the politicians are hell bent on forcing the banks to behave in a manner that may very well cause their eventual destruction.
In fact I'd even go so far as to say that congress is responsible for a misinformation campaign that is mischaracterizing not only the nature of the TARP program, but the nature of the financial crisis itself. Now maybe they're doing it by accident because they don't know any better, or maybe they're doing it because they want to please the electorate, either way the net effect is the same.
What else is there to say when the politicians are pushing insolvent banks to lend more, pretending as if mortgage modification actually works, and are blatantly ignoring the true nature of the crisis in order to push the banks to act in accordance with some fantasy?
Lest they lead us down the path towards economic oblivion our Government needs to wake up to the following:
The Banking System is insolvent: therefore the goal of capital infusions is to enable the banks to maintain current operations and keep from going under, while also helping them survive coming loan losses and other financial strains. Asking banks who are in need of capital infusions to increase their lending is akin to asking a heart attack victim to eat a steak instead of calling 911.
We're coming off of a credit bubble: a lot of the pain being felt in the economy is the result of people having binged on credit, and/or from having to adjust not being able to use credit to spend above their means. The old lending volumes were unsustainable, and a lot of the net decrease in lending is the result of that adjustment. Furthermore, there are plenty of good reasons for not lending as much money in an environment like this.
Finally lending only declined by 1.4% last quarter. Without the TARP program not only would lending have declined by a much larger margin, but there would've undoubtedly been fewer banks to lend in the first place.
The arguments that Congress is making around the banks failing to save the economy via increased lending are mathematically invalid. In fact I'd go so far as to say that their current arguments are the functional equivalent of claiming that 2 + 2 = H.
Mortgage modifications don't work: whether the person overspent or has experienced a significant loss of income, changing the terms of the mortgage cannot change the fact that lack of income is the core problem. You can't modify someone out of a mortgage they can't afford, hence the reason mortgage modifications have been a colossal failure.
Personally I can't believe the clowns in Congress have the gall to lambast someone else for causing the financial crisis when they themselves ran the mortgage GSEs into the ground.
Perhaps we citizens should hold our own hearings and grill Congress for their own stupidity, as it was well within their powers to either prevent or significantly mitigate the credit crisis if only they weren't asleep at the wheel. I dare say that many of them were aware of the risks but were more interested in happy sound bites about the alleged wealth the housing market was creating.
As I said last week, I'm sick and damn tired of the Government's Glass House.
Final Thought: over the years Congress has held hearings on everything from oil prices, to steroids in Baseball to the current financial crisis, yet can anyone name a single positive result that has come out of these hearings?
Well?
Sources:
Reuters: "Wall St. CEOs scolded by lawmakers" -- Steve Holland, Karey Wutkowski, February 11, 2009.
WSJ: "Bankers Pledge to Lend, Help Stem Foreclosures" -- Maya Jackson Randall, February 11, 2009.
Disclosure: at the time of publishing the author didn't own a position in any of the companies mentioned in this article; the ideas expressed are solely the opinions of the author and shouldn't be viewed as financial or investment advice.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
David Fry
-
2
TraderMark
-
3
Don Dion
-
4
Cliff Wachtel
-
5
Joseph L. Sha...
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
I personally wished at least one of the CEO would call these pandering posturers (congressional Dems) a bunch of phonies and launch into a speech about how they, the congress, created this mess - and flatly tell them they will not come back to such a hearing. Takes some balls, but man would it be so accurate and nice to see...
On Feb 12 08:17 AM prudentinvestor wrote:
> "Social lending" may be good political policy (or not, depending
> on your point of view). However, it is surely bad business policy
> for a bank in the private sector. Congress needs to decide whether
> we need private sector retail banks at all, as they are fundamentally
> inconsistent with the notion of lending to achieve social goals.
> If that is what congress wants, they should nationalise them.
Our idiotic and evil congresscritters (including Barney Frank, Maxine Waters and a creature from Massachusetts called Capuano) may be completely worthless as statemen, but they are entertaining. The court is completely full of court-jesters and there are no nobles.
Poor dumb me, I thought that the present congress - and the president - inherited the mess from the incompetent government of the previous 8 years. In fact I not only thought it, I know it, because if that government had been even slightly competent, Mr Obama would be walking the groovy streets of the South Side of Chicago with a frown on his face.
The SNL skit after Detroit asked for money was pretty good. My favorites:
-Carolyn Maloney explained that they already helped Detroit, because Congress set targets for 200 MPG cars. "We've done our part."
-Barney Frank gave Detroit some helpful product planning advice. "Build more gay cars. That Mini Cooper is cute."
Just watching the monkeys from DC is enough to short the entire economy. As usual, the politicians don't have a clue.
Waiting for a Saturday Night Live skit to give the answers that Dimon et al really wanted to give. Starting that Barney Frank and his cronies are responsible for the housing crisis.
"Please find a way to return that money before you leave town."
"simply have not seen the evidence that the money you were given is working or making their lives better."
"You created this mess we're in and now you're saying, "sorry -- trust us and by the way we don't even want the money,'" "America doesn't trust you anymore. Get our money back on the street."
Pull the press out of the room and watch how fast these hearings would (would've) take(n) place........ 4-5 hours max.
We have few statesmen left and the result is another half-baked "negotiated" plan to screw things up even more (i can hear "inflation" belching in the other room as he continues to gobble at the table that we have so finely appointed and set for him). I guess i'll just rationalize like everyone else and say, "well, its a start," eeejsch.
We're in big big trouble here folks. Between the rape of the economy that Wall Street & the big financials perpetrated on America and the idiocy of Congress in addressing the real issues and avoidance of admission of their hand in same, we are sinking.......... there aren't enough buckets and arms on this ship to bail fast enough. We're 5 years now from daylight.......... didnt have to happen this way either; sad.
Human beeing, unfortunately, need wars to remember that peace is far better, need plague to remember that life's important need a financial crisis to remember that if you want to live better it's just enough to work harder and not to cheat. We have all been cheating for decades and now it's very healthy to pay the price. I hope no one saves us but that we learn to save ourselves and, hopefully, learn from our mistakes. If the Fed saves your banking system in few decades we would have the an even bigger crisis.
-True enough. To me, the really scary thing about Kanjorski's CSPAN interview that everyone has seen by now <<www.youtube.com/watch?...;>
was not the rapid drawdown of electronic funds but his frank admission of his and others' in congress ignorance on all things economic. Come to think of it, no economist has ever run for office in any congressional district where I've lived. That's just one of the vulnerabilities of a representative form of gov't.
One of Obama's promised changes was a new openess of gov't & a willingness to consider outside opinions; I hope there is something behind that beyond campaign platitudes. I've read some compelling, well-thought-out and articulated ideas on this site for handling everything from the banking problems to the bailout. If you have taken the time to come up w/ something of value, please forward it along to the administration and take them at their word- Geithner invited all ideas on Tues.
I do not get any satisfaction seeing most all of these incompetant elected officials embarrass themselves by their bare ignorance of the issues and facts involved. It's simply tragic to watch on TV!