My Plan to Fix the Housing Problem 7 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Right now, there is a good government plan to address the housing problem. There is talk of allowing judges to reduce the principal on mortgages. In my opinion, this plan is unfair to banks and unfair to people that borrowed reasonable amounts of money.
Here is my plan:
If I take out a $700,000 mortgage, and can’t pay it, have the bank (or the government, if they buy the toxic loans) break the loan into 2 pieces:
- The first piece is a hypothetical $300,000 loan (although this number could vary). The $300,000 loan would have a 0% rate and no principal payments due.
- Create a new mortgage with favorable terms - $400,000 loan with 30 – 40 year life and a low 4.5% - 5.5% fixed rate.
If I ever sell the house, and the house sells for more than the $300,000 and $400,000 loans (whatever their balance is), I keep the profit.
If I try to sell the house for less than the two loan balances, then I first must offer it to the bank that holds the two loans.
This plan makes homes more affordable, but doesn’t allow for a free ride (with the exception of the favorable lending rates). I think it is a win-win; more people can stay in their homes, and banks will have less foreclosures to deal with.
If no one adopts this plan, then an alternative would be to give the banks an option to buy on the homes where principal balances are cut. In this case, homeowners can’t double dip, where they get a reduced principal balance but in 10-15 years can sell for a profit. The option would be indefinite, and the bank would benefit from any price appreciation.
These plans offer more fairness to all parties than any other plans I have heard. At least a dialogue on the topic may produce better answers than the government has to offer.
Related Articles
|





















On Feb 18 08:26 AM MJJP wrote:
> I've said this before and I will say it again and again as long as
> people are posting about real estate. One of the main reasons for
> the problems that homeowners are facing is that the values of the
> homes they are paying mortgages on are plummeting. DUH!!! This happens
> all the time for a number of reasons. It happened with me. I purchased
> a home almost twenty years ago and added two rooms , a garage, resided
> and reroofed and being handy with the help of relatives did most
> of it ourselves. In our market I would be hardpressed to get what
> I paid for it plus materials. You buy a home to live in not invest
> in. If the homeowners are employed adjust the payment down and extend
> the term where they can pay for it or tell them there is a bankruptcy
> court waiting for them.
Also lower mortgae interest rate to 3.5% and allow people who are under-water to refinance with option to pay interest only if they choose. There should be no negative amortization.
The goal is to reduce monthly mortgage payment by 30-40%.
You can calculate this. Reduction like this is needed, people will be able to pay for mortgages and they will have some money to spend to move our economy.
There is always solution to problem.
People cheated on loan applications on so called stated income program- they bought houses they could not afford to pay.
Banks gave such loan due to poor underwriting standards, their ignored documentation about income and as result they drove themself into bankruptcies.
We the people who are working hard , should not pay for other people and banks mistakes.
Who should pay for this lower payments:
Answer:
Banks should modify mortgages with no re-application, all people who have mortgages should have lower interest.
FED gave banks. 50 discount rate and mortgage rate should be now 3.5%. Why this is not? Banks like JPMorgan, Wells Fargo Bank and,Bank of America with idiotic management are too gready.
These banks who drove our country into recession should be forced by government to refinance all mortgages to 3.5% as of today or face bunkruptcies.
There are a lot of banks that are solvent and they do not have such problem.
We should not worry if bank goes bunkrupt or people. We need this in our system to ged rid of the worse.
Now houses are affordable and people can afford to buy - first time home buyers and in addition to it there is Tax Credit -$8,000.00 waiting for them.
Do you not believe that nothing is free ,it will have to be paid for
at some time.
Irresponsible spenders should be bailed out but not by fat panda , mjjp smalltown banker or me duffbeer !!!
Nana and Dan why don't you gather up all your money,your families money and all those that love using others money to bail out dead beats and YOU GUYS BAIL THEM OUT.
I have been there , I know what the bottom looks like ,feels like, sounds like, and on and on. A vcr movie and popcorn was a night out. I know you can get out of it by yourself if you want to but there is PAIN and one has to Sacrifice. Any liberal democrat would have no idea what those two words mean .
This I now can afford a good brew and it is time to go get one.
Cheers, DuffBeer
On Feb 18 08:26 AM MJJP wrote:
> I've said this before and I will say it again and again as long as
> people are posting about real estate. One of the main reasons for
> the problems that homeowners are facing is that the values of the
> homes they are paying mortgages on are plummeting. DUH!!! This happens
> all the time for a number of reasons. It happened with me. I purchased
> a home almost twenty years ago and added two rooms , a garage, resided
> and reroofed and being handy with the help of relatives did most
> of it ourselves. In our market I would be hardpressed to get what
> I paid for it plus materials. You buy a home to live in not invest
> in. If the homeowners are employed adjust the payment down and extend
> the term where they can pay for it or tell them there is a bankruptcy
> court waiting for them.