Should You Follow Warren Buffett’s Latest Moves? 15 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) published a glimpse of its stock portfolio holdings as of December 31,2008, on the SEC website. I have highlighted the largest changes in shares owned.
In the last quarter of 2008 Warren Buffett kept adding to his Burlington Northern (BNI) position by purchasing well over 6 million shares for Berkshire’s account. He also added to his positions in Ingersoll-Rand (IR), NRG Energy (NRG), and Eaton (ETN). He initiated positions in Constellation Energy Group (CEG) using his Midamerican subsidiary and in Nalco (NLC).
Buffett was not only buying American however. He was selling as well. Berkshire cut its stake in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) by half to 28 million shares. Other notable decreases included Procter & Gamble (PG), US Bancorp (USB), Conoco-Phillips (COP) and Carmax (KMX). Berkshire also disposed of all of its Anheuser-Busch stock, which was tendered at $70/share after the merger with InBev. The holdings in other financial stocks such as Wells Fargo (WFC), American Express (AXP), Moody's (MCO) and Bank of America (BAC) were mainly unchanged for the quarter.
The value of Berkshire’s portfolio dropped to $51.87 billion from $69.89 billion at the end of third quarter 2008. Even the Oracle of Omaha is not immune to market corrections, especially now that his asset base is so huge. Berkshire Hathaway shares dropped by 26% in the last quarter of 2008, compared with a 21.5% drop for the broad S&P 500 index. So far this year both S&P 500 and Berkshire Hathaway stock are down between 12.20% and 13% each respectively.
Given the changes in Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio, I would not recommend acting similarly in your personal investments, based solely on following Buffett’s moves. One reason why he might be selling solid dividend stocks such as Johnson & Johnson and Procter and Gamble could be that they haven’t fallen as much as the broader market, which makes them ideal for Buffett to deploy the funds in other beaten down sectors. Another reason could be that he needs to raise as much cash as possible, in order to participate in other preferred stock or fixed income deals, where he could earn a 10%-15% annual dividend yield, with very favorable terms for his company. Ordinary investors do not however have the purchasing power to participate in such favorable deals at this time. His list of fixed income or preferred stock investments range from Goldman Sachs (GS), General Electric (GE), USG, Swiss Re, Harley Davidson (HOG) and Tiffany’s (TIF).
Related Articles
|





















This article has 15 comments:
But look again at this:
"One reason why he might be selling solid dividend stocks such as Johnson & Johnson and Procter and Gamble could be that they haven’t fallen as much as the broader market, which makes them ideal for Buffett to deploy the funds in other beaten down sectors."
If Buffett sees greater value in other sectors, then shouldn't other investors too?
I am thinking that if the U.S.dollar falls more, he may be setting up to use another currency?
Of course you could always buy BRKa/b and not need to do any research. Of course i enjoy trying to decipher what made Buffett decide to rebalance his portfolio.
Furthermore i see a major risk in BRKa/b that Buffett's investment objectives might not be the same as yours. Also in Buffett "retires" from BRKa you will be left with stock in the company, but the Buffett premium will soon evaporate and the stock will fall.. The end result is that you would have learned a valuable lesson - always do your own homework,
On Feb 19 06:01 AM Michael Zhuang wrote:
> Why make things more complicated than necessary? Why not just buy
> BRK.A or BRK.B?
Another reason could be that he needs to raise as much cash as possible, in order to participate in other preferred stock or fixed income deals, where he could earn a 10%-15% annual dividend yield, with very favorable terms for his company. Ordinary investors do not however have the purchasing power to participate in such favorable deals at this time.
On Feb 19 06:53 AM Hedged In wrote:
> This is good attempt to rationalize Warren Buffett's moves -- thank
> you.
>
> But look again at this:
> "One reason why he might be selling solid dividend stocks such as
> Johnson & Johnson and Procter and Gamble could be that they haven’t
> fallen as much as the broader market, which makes them ideal for
> Buffett to deploy the funds in other beaten down sectors."
>
> If Buffett sees greater value in other sectors, then shouldn't other
> investors too?
Actually the opposite is true - investors who mimicked Buffett's portfolio would have outperformed the markets over the past 30 years:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p...
On Feb 19 08:31 AM SALTAWAY wrote:
> I would point out that the average investor that follows and mimics
> Buffet's picks has not done well over the last 20 years or so. Because
> of the time lag between his moves and public knowledge, you are doomed
> to underperform him. I agree with Michael above. I wouldnt copy him,
> I would let him run my money by buying brk.a or brk.b
Most of JNJ and PG's products are things people use on a daily basis. Even a great depression shouldn't hit these companies too hard.
City Desk,
Buffett took a 3 billion francs in convertible preferred shares in Swiss Re that pay an annual interest rate of 12% and will be convertible into common stock after three years at a price of 25 francs a share, subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
If the entire investment of 3 billion francs were converted into shares, Buffett could end up holding more than a fifth of Swiss Re
On Feb 19 04:11 PM Jason C. Rines wrote:
> Just a guess as to WB's thinking on J&J and Proctor and Gamble.
> These companies are mixed Consumer Healthcare products and have greater
> exposure to consumers pulling spending back then say, a straight
> Pharmaceutical company selling essential Rx treatments. The writing
> is on the wall, we are in depression.
For those who have never lived in that time frame it is hard to understand the hardships of every day life.
The little emenitys that we take for granted would then have been a luxury. Every company would have to restructure and make conseccions.
On Feb 24 03:42 AM Dividend Growth Investor wrote:
> Jason,
>
> Most of JNJ and PG's products are things people use on a daily basis.
> Even a great depression shouldn't hit these companies too hard.
>
>
> City Desk,
>
> Buffett took a 3 billion francs in convertible preferred shares in
> Swiss Re that pay an annual interest rate of 12% and will be convertible
> into common stock after three years at a price of 25 francs a share,
> subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
> If the entire investment of 3 billion francs were converted into
> shares, Buffett could end up holding more than a fifth of Swiss Re
>