Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Anybody holding a long position in USO has been absolutely decimated. The good news is no selling pressure will mount due to profit taking. There is simply none to take. The smart money might be slowly accumulating now, as the last three days of trading show signs of a basing formation being established. Friday's intraday reversal, on a spike in volume, could be a "clue" of a nearing capitulation. The shares are now 7% higher than their all time historical low of $22.74.

Further cuts in OPEC production coupled with spikes in activity, due to the unleashing of the stimulus package could alter the supply demand pattern more in favor of the bulls. China could restart their voracious appetite for energy. Lower gasoline prices have the tendency to prompt consumers to drive more, and we are nearing the heavy summer vacation driving season.

USO's bulging short position could create a huge wave of buying via short covering, if the shorts start to get nervous. The bears have experienced tremendous profits in USO, and getting greedy at this point would be darn right idiotic. They certainly do not want to see their profits go up in smoke, as an eruption of a "global crisis", occurring at any time, has the capacity to double the price of crude in less than a week. It is simply too risky to be short USO at this juncture, as its upside potential dwarfs its limited downside.

Be a contrarian: Crude has fallen an unprecedented amount. This has caused USO to implode nearly 80% from last year's highs. It has simply dropped too much in too short of a timeframe. Those who have the risk tolerance to buy now, set themselves up for the biggest reward. To exploit an over-reactive market, prudent buyers hone in on unpopular ideas, and USO 's sentiment is so negative at this juncture, it is clearly near an important turning point. The game is merely about buying low and selling high, and to do so, the investor must buy when an equity is unpopular and conversely sell, when it is popular. How else are you supposed to buy low and sell high? Easy to say, hard to do.

Bottom line: Do not be too tempted to catch a falling knife at this time, however we are getting very close to an appropriate entry point. If you look at USO's three month graph (sorry about the technical analysis) and create a declining tops line- you'll detect a potential breakout point near the $27 area. Sure you'll have to pay more, if you wait until that trigger point, but it will be worth it, as the trend will be in your favor (and you get what you pay for).

In other words, wait until Jed Clampett goes shooting for some food, and up through the ground come a bubbling crude. Translation: Place a buy stop order at $27.25 per share, sit back, and the first thing you know is : "you're a millionaire".

Disclosure: No position

Print this article with comments

This article has 33 comments:

  •  
    oils demand will get smaller and smaller as the whole world goes green!
    Feb 22 05:22 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    all right what is the schedule for the whole world going green? is it 20 yrs or 50 yrs.?
    > jack
    Feb 22 09:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    On the graph even CITIGROUP looks cheap, you don't understand the power of deleveraging.
    It can put Oil at 5-10$.
    I will buy financials soon, Oil will look at 20$ good priced for a short term bounce to 27$.
    Feb 22 10:39 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I've been bearish on oil and oil ETF's until now. But,a host of indicators say the recession is over. The LEI was up .4% last month,it's second consecutive gain. Jan. retail sales were up. The PPI was up .4%,for it's first positive number in 6 months. Existing home sales are up sharply. To top it off,gasoline and distillate fuel consumption grew y/y in the latest energy report. The crude oil inventory draw was a complete shock. OPEC is still cutting production. Another 800,000 bpd will be shaved in the next two weeks. All these factors in combination are extremely bullish for oil. The snapback will be sharp. Figure in trillions in stimulus plans by governments around the world,and the stage is set for $200 oil in the next 2 years.
    Feb 22 11:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This article implies that a quick turnaround for oil is just around the corner, and that we are 'close to an appropriate entry point'. I hope you're right, and am likewise watching for a good entry.
    Peak oil is indeed a fact. So too, is oil in the low $30 range. Oil will trade in this annoying $30-$60 range for some time until global demand begins once more to pressure supply.
    Trading assumptions, both long and short, have resulted in many lost fortunes over the past 26 months. Spot the trend, up or down, and ride it out, but don't assume that USO at current levels is a great buy!
    As USO's price is still below the (falling) 5, and 10 day MA's, and just managed to squeeze above the 15 day MA, the trend is still lower.
    Rather than set an arbitrary entry point of a breakout >$27, why not wait until the 25 day MA is breached and held, irrespective of the price at that time? This would give a better indication of the trend!
    Feb 22 11:43 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    On 12/25/08, the author wrote, "Buying USO Is a No-Brainer"...."$28 borders on insanity"..."I am backing up the truck on this one." I hope the truck was unloaded at $35.
    Feb 22 11:48 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Every assets is approaching $0. The slide down will include some bumps up to fake us into buying. Government control is the end of a free enomomy.
    Feb 22 01:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I read SA authors elsewhere urging readers to jump in with LDK at around $12, and now that stock is well below $8 and falling fast. Some say the entry would be around $3 (?).

    I read SA authors elsewhere urging readers to jump in with VZ at $35, and that stock had been trading well below $30 over the past several months and is still descending at this writing. Some say the entry would be around $23 (?).

    I read SA authors elsewhere urging folks to jump in with USO at the low $30's. Well?.

    The reader might refresh his/her memories that Ms. Meredith Whitney said on TV in August 2008 that C at below $10 would be a "once-in-a-life-time buying opportunity". I bought some C at around $1.70 last Friday.

    I think it would save you a bundle if you would recognize that entry price levels are still constantly being revised downward.
    Feb 22 02:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    How in the world can you use "technical analysis" on USO when so much of its current under performance is due to extreme contango in the oil markets? Or not even mention this fundamental condition of the oil market which is the source of much of USO's loss this year relative to the broader oil market? If you must resort to technical analysis, at least use it on oil itself. The big issue facing USO as an oil play is the accounting issue of having to monthly roll over futures contracts in the face of contango, and given that condition no "basing formation" will hold.
    Feb 22 02:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Perry, I share most of your opinions. Great Post!
    Feb 22 02:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There does not seem to be a bottom for anything yet. I prefer to wait and see a 20 percent pop before jumping back to oil.
    However, I am looking at for the first time some Canadian Trusts that do not trade here (USA) for the first time. Even with the devastation they have had in price and yield cuts, they now look to good to be further ignored.
    I guess I'm in on oil and gas at this juncture too.
    Feb 22 03:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Recession is over?? This thing has just started - give it at least two years. I have no idea what will happen with oil - it may go up, but it may also get decimated in a declining worldwide economy.
    Feb 22 03:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    As long as there are so many USO bulls yelling "buy buy buy" on SA, I'm not going to buy.

    When the crowd, especially those of retail types, is betting against the underlying trend, it's pretty safe to trade along side the trend.
    Feb 22 04:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What about the 80 million barrels of oil stored in the floating tankers ? See this weeks business week 3/2/09 pg. 14.

    Contango
    Feb 22 05:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Given that USO is hit hard by contango, does that mean it will benefit meaningfully from a return to backwardation?

    I am watching this carefully and considering buying USO when the monthly contract roll starts breaking even or better making a profit for the fund.

    Please remember that a position in USO is NOT a position in Oil. It is a position in oil for near term delivery plus or minus the cost of rolling out to the next delivery month in order to AVOID taking delivery of any actual oil.

    To me it seems quite quite conceivable that the spot price of oil could drift slowly up while the value of USO could continue to go down.




    On Feb 22 02:29 PM Alvarez wrote:

    > How in the world can you use "technical analysis" on USO when so
    > much of its current under performance is due to extreme contango
    > in the oil markets? Or not even mention this fundamental condition
    > of the oil market which is the source of much of USO's loss this
    > year relative to the broader oil market? If you must resort to technical
    > analysis, at least use it on oil itself. The big issue facing USO
    > as an oil play is the accounting issue of having to monthly roll
    > over futures contracts in the face of contango, and given that condition
    > no "basing formation" will hold.
    Feb 22 07:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I don't know if this will work but for those interested in USO here is a link illustrating how much USO has been underperofrming the price of oil recently

    Buyer beware!

    photos1.blogger.com/x/...
    Feb 22 07:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You are right. Basically by buying USO you are taking a position both on the price of oil AND the shape of the oil futures curve. So long as the market remains in contango, at each month's roll over the owners of USO roll into a lower quantity of oil per share than they had the month before. While not exactly the same, in some ways a position in USO is reminiscent of a long term option in the way it suffers from time decay (again, so long as the market remains in contango).

    In terms of full disclosure, I'm bullish on oil longer term, and about a month ago started slowly building a position with a 3-5 year time horizon in mind. To be perfectly blunt, I didn't spend enough time thinking through the contango implications until after I had made some (thankfully small) initial purchases. I still like the idea of slowly building a long position at these and lower levels, but am working through the best way to do this, perhaps combining USO and USL to some degree.

    On Feb 22 07:10 PM boisterousbob wrote:

    > Given that USO is hit hard by contango, does that mean it will benefit
    > meaningfully from a return to backwardation?
    >
    > I am watching this carefully and considering buying USO when the
    > monthly contract roll starts breaking even or better making a profit
    > for the fund.
    >
    > Please remember that a position in USO is NOT a position in Oil.
    > It is a position in oil for near term delivery plus or minus the
    > cost of rolling out to the next delivery month in order to AVOID
    > taking delivery of any actual oil.
    >
    > To me it seems quite quite conceivable that the spot price of oil
    > could drift slowly up while the value of USO could continue to go
    > down.
    >
    >
    Feb 22 07:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    so under what, if any, circumstances would the price of USO go up while contango is remains in effect?

    conversely, would anything short a reversal of the recession, or acute geopolitical crisis, be likely to result in backwardation?


    On Feb 22 07:54 PM Alvarez wrote:

    > You are right. Basically by buying USO you are taking a position
    > both on the price of oil AND the shape of the oil futures curve.
    > So long as the market remains in contango, at each month's roll over
    > the owners of USO roll into a lower quantity of oil per share than
    > they had the month before. While not exactly the same, in some ways
    > a position in USO is reminiscent of a long term option in the way
    > it suffers from time decay (again, so long as the market remains
    > in contango).
    >
    > In terms of full disclosure, I'm bullish on oil longer term, and
    > about a month ago started slowly building a position with a 3-5 year
    > time horizon in mind. To be perfectly blunt, I didn't spend enough
    > time thinking through the contango implications until after I had
    > made some (thankfully small) initial purchases. I still like the
    > idea of slowly building a long position at these and lower levels,
    > but am working through the best way to do this, perhaps combining
    > USO and USL to some degree.
    >
    > On Feb 22 07:10 PM boisterousbob wrote:
    Feb 22 10:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The WTI was up from $34 to $40 in the last 3 days but the USO was flat. That tells me something is wrong with the way the USO is behaving. It will have to go up $6 to get back to its previous $10 differential. Or the WTI will have to drop back to $34. Am I the only one that sees this problem?
    Feb 22 11:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There have been some articles on SA recently about this very issue, so check them out for a better explanation. But my understanding is that USO should basically move roughly in line with the current month futures contract. The problem comes at the time when they roll over their positions if there is a big difference between this month's price and next month's.

    Say the current month was trading at $40 and the next month was trading at $45 (made up numbers), and the prices don't move at all between now and the current month expiration. When the time comes for them to roll over the contracts, their "entry price" for the new contracts would be $45. In essence, your cost basis has shifted to $45 oil, when you thought you bought into oil at $40. Should next month oil then trend down to $40, far from being flat on the position (as you might have expected) you would be down >10%.

    Another way to look at it: to be long USO you need not only believe that the price of oil will go up, but also that it will go up more than what is already reflected in the futures curve. That's OK, as long as you know what you are getting into.

    My understanding is that USL spreads its positions across futures covering the next 12 months, so it doesn't respond to contango in the same way. Of course, a position constructed using USL means buying oil for a higher effective price than is reflected in the oil spot market, increasing your risk to the downside.

    On Feb 22 10:22 PM ktchnsnk wrote:

    > so under what, if any, circumstances would the price of USO go up
    > while contango is remains in effect?
    >
    > conversely, would anything short a reversal of the recession, or
    > acute geopolitical crisis, be likely to result in backwardation?
    >
    Feb 23 12:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Anybody know what Marc Rich and Spanky Green are doing lately?
    Feb 23 01:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey Mark,

    Arent you the same guy who was here a couple months back pumping an "all in" play on USO at around $32?? What happened to that position? In your disclosures you list no position taken.... Anyway, back to the point at hand... Suggesting long on USO again? Really? From what Ive read here, even the oil bulls are extremely hesitant on an Oil ETF like USO...
    Two things to me are absolutely laughable. One is that you site as one of your reasons in taking up a long position in USO the fact that
    " Shares are now 7% off their all time Lows of $22.74"
    You're kidding, right? First off, the funds inception was mid 2006. I wouldent get overly concerned about "historic" pricing here trying to value this ETF. This is the real kicker... you could have said the EXACT SAME THING nearly EVERY DAY since the middle of Nov last year when the ETF breached $43! Every day from then to its Feb 18 low where there was an intra-day rebound or next day rebound of 7% would lead to the exact same horse crap logic for jumping onboard!
    Also, someone faults technicals as an illogical way to enter/exit this ETF due to the fact there is extreme contango in the oil markets... well, perhaps. But conango or not, I still see unraveling technicals with no end in site to the downside. You may want to become a millionare going long in USO, but the only place you are going to send investors by pumping USO is straight to the poorhouse.
    The only logical course of action here is to the short side. Same as it was at $32.
    Feb 23 02:34 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Technical analysis suggests we have broken through support and there is more downside to come.
    Feb 23 06:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The longer crude stays below $40, the more production is being taken off the market. At this stage all 35 million barrels of storage at the Cushing, Oklahoma delivery point for west Texas intermediate are brimming with crude. The 709 million barrel Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is nearly full. And there is another 50 million barrels stored in supertankers at sea which is building by the day. Demand has collapsed so fast, that oil companies can’t shut down production fast enough. The scary thing about this is that when the next crude spike upward in crude comes, it will be worse than the last one. Take advantage of the current distress prices to accumulate oil infrastructure stocks. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (KMP) has a PE multiple of 25 and a dividend yield of 8.3%. Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) has a $10 billion portfolio of fractionation facilities, storage, offshore drilling platforms, and 32,478 miles of product, natural gas, and crude pipelines, and carries a modest PE multiple of 12 X and a dividend yield of 9.2%. More expensive Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (KMP) with a PE multiple of 25 X and a dividend yield of 8.3% is also worth a look see.
    Feb 23 07:19 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    That's little more than three [3] day usage just for the US alone! Globally speaking it's a drop in the bucket.


    On Feb 22 05:19 PM Joe Red wrote:

    > What about the 80 million barrels of oil stored in the floating tankers
    > ? See this weeks business week 3/2/09 pg. 14.
    >
    > Contango
    Feb 23 08:57 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well business/executive control hasn't exactly been a boon of late either. I sincerely don't believe that the citizens of this government or the government itself wants to be in the oil, banking, auto, energy, investment, etc,etc.... business. However, in light of the havoc created and the losses the American people have had to endure because of greedy and corupt practices, it is a no-brainer that government needs to step in and establish some firmer and fairer operating rules. That is "a no brainer" for those with brains. The rest just subscribe to the mantra that the incompetent theives have prescribed for them.


    On Feb 22 01:29 PM toomuchgas wrote:

    > Every assets is approaching $0. The slide down will include some
    > bumps up to fake us into buying. Government control is the end of
    > a free enomomy.
    Feb 23 06:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It is impossible to make a profit due to mega-contango.
    Feb 23 06:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Participation % = ~ 23.32/38 * 100 = 61.4%. Go long when this number stays equal or rise. This can last months / years.
    Feb 23 06:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    BTW I never saw this number mentioned? Why is it that nobody talks about the participation %?
    Feb 23 06:13 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    contango yadda yadda, cushing blah, blah, conversely etc. etc...

    I'm buying oil with money I don't need for a while
    no brainer really, ...
    Feb 23 09:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    USL not USO. The choice is clear.


    On Feb 22 11:41 AM Perry1961 wrote:

    > I've been bearish on oil and oil ETF's until now. But,a host of indicators
    > say the recession is over. The LEI was up .4% last month,it's second
    > consecutive gain. Jan. retail sales were up. The PPI was up .4%,for
    > it's first positive number in 6 months. Existing home sales are up
    > sharply. To top it off,gasoline and distillate fuel consumption grew
    > y/y in the latest energy report. The crude oil inventory draw was
    > a complete shock. OPEC is still cutting production. Another 800,000
    > bpd will be shaved in the next two weeks. All these factors in combination
    > are extremely bullish for oil. The snapback will be sharp. Figure
    > in trillions in stimulus plans by governments around the world,and
    > the stage is set for $200 oil in the next 2 years.
    Feb 23 10:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    From most of the blogs and posts that I read including this one folks appear to be overly pessimistic about oil and the economy, which is in bad shape but markets tend to over correct or over shoot in the short term which i think is happening and even more so with a whole new administration that no-one knows what to expect. One thing I do know is we will get through these time sof uncertainty and Americans will continue to drive and more as nicer weather rolls in. I see no lack of cars or trucks on the roads in the NYC metro area (ny, nj, ct) it seems business as ususal to be honest.

    Oil represents a very good buy here, unlike housing or other really big purchase items, we use it every day as does most of the rest of the modern world which means we will work through the excess inventory whicle opec is cutting, I fear we will have a dramatic spike in oil prices in the not too distant future 12 months, 24 months etc because these cuts and because everyone did not stop driving or flying or heating there homes in the older cities where oil burners are prevalent.

    Mostly we need higher oil prices to make green initiatives more attractive, after all most of us think with our pockets and secondly with our social or environmental concerns, just the truth.
    Feb 25 10:57 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The technical set up is all there, and fundamentals for oil are starting to improve , i would definitely go long on USO.
    Feb 25 04:43 PM | Link | Reply