Luxury Manhattan Real Estate Could Fall Another 50% - Barron's 17 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Even Barron’s, which forecast in November a New York real estate decline, seems surprised by the velocity of NYC’s luxury market crash. Sales were down 40% while prices declined 20% in Q408. Look out, says Barron’s Leslie P. Norton: High end NYC apartments and townhouses could fall by another 30%-50% and recovery will be protracted.
Two years into a nationwide downturn, NY is just starting to feel housing pain. Yet feel it it is as the city faces a perfect storm of harder-to-get “super-jumbo” ($650K+) loans, higher down payment and credit score requirements, disappearing Wall St. jobs and a glut of condo conversions. Purported housing bubble inflators such as foreign buyers and hedge fund managers have retreated. Even the merely affluent are feeling stock market shock.
The average Manhattan apartment still costs $1.6 million, while top apartments are going for as high as $65-80 million. Yet high-end inventory rose 65% in Q408 even as ultra luxe residential projects like the refurbished Plaza Hotel cut prices. Condo conversions city-wide are barely selling.
Housing expert Ivy Zelman says NY’s housing bubble was particularly frothy. Zelman foresees a 46% decline before prices become “normalized” again. Goldman Sachs predicts condo price declines of 35%-44%.
True that once-in-a-lifetime deals like Brooke Astor’s $46 million penthouse can now be had for $29 million, but how much less will that be in 2009? Buyer beware.
Related Articles
|

























This article has 17 comments:
On Feb 22 11:26 PM sundrenched wrote:
> When I went to grad school in NYC in the early 1990s, one of my friends
> bought a 2-bedroom apartment inclusive private use of the garden
> on 77th street, just off Columbus, for 120k. It wasn't a dump at
> all, it was one of the nicer 2-bedrooms that i've seen in NYC, very
> quiet also as all rooms were facing the garden. Another friend lived
> in a large (I estimate 800sqf) studio apartment on Prince Street
> that her parents had bought for her for 60k. I don't expect you
> to believe me -- I almost have trouble believing it myself today!
News Corporation(NasdaqGS: NWS)
Today journalist write what sponsor orders, if some tycoon wants to buy real estate in Manhattan, Barron's will write it goes 50% down, if seller want to get a better price, then Barron's will write real estate goes up 50%.
Thanks for following this story. I think it may have parallels in SF, LA and San Diego.
As far as Northern NV is concerned, based on current sales trends, there's a 16.5 year(!!) supply of homes for sale over $1 million. 198 current listings, 1 sale.
I don't know how that compares with other markets, but it seems a staggering number. Another way to look at it is that it would take until 2025 to sell all the homes in this price band if no other properties are listed for that period of time.
Listing prices are sticky, but as you've pointed out with NYC, even the stickiest glue eventually deteriorates. Either buyers will flood the market (unlikely) or prices will eventually fall dramatically (much more likely).
ATB,
Bill
A followup comment:
Some recent research locally has found that nearly 80% of real estate closings are either short sales or REOs. What that means to me is that there are precious few move-up buyers who actually get cash from the sale of their existing home and can upgrade to a larger one.
That phenomenon is also, in my opinion, limiting the number of buyers for move-up properties nationwide. I'm aware that the distressed sales ratio nationally is about 45%, but local trends may be far different.
And with high income jobs disappearing in urban areas because of the downsizing of the financial services industry, look for more price declines (particularly for high value properties) in cities like Chicago, Washington DC, Dallas, LA, SF and Seattle, as well as suburbs like Atherton, CA, Fairfax, VA, Greenwich, CT, and Long Island, NY. Move up buyers don't exist, and high income jobs are hard to find (and keep).
More pain, but this time it's the 'rich' who will be suffering. And with the recently announced tax hikes and deduction limitations, buying a house as a tax shelter may become less appealing to those who need the writeoffs.
ATB,
Bill
Interesting detail, thanks!
ATB,
Judy
Updates from Northern NV for March 2009:
Sales are up, prices are down. Sales transactions are running 25% higher than last year, and inventory listed below $400,000 is nearing a 'balanced' supply, with 9 months of inventory based on current sales patterns. The median sales price has dropped to $200,000, and below $191,000 if condo sales are included.
That's the good news. The bad news? Still more than 5 years worth of inventory for properties above $1 million, and 770 Notices of Default were filed during the month, an average of 35 a day!
We're seeing a spike in commercial real estate Notices of Default, principally from small developers who bought land near the peak, and neighborhood mall operators struggling with high vacancies. (One area in Reno has a 25% vacancy rate in commercial property, including retail, commercial office, and industrial space.)
Source: renorealtyblog.com
This might be the floor, but we're probably going to slide along it for awhile. The NOD moratoriums have run their course, so I expect even more default notices to be sent out in April.
I'd like to know how this area is comparing to other regions hard-hit by the crash.
Your comments, as always, are appreciated!
ATB
Bill