Walter Hosp - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
HMS Holdings Corp. (HMSY) Citi Global Healthcare Conference February 26, 2013 9:35 AM ET
Walter Hosp - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, James. Good morning everyone. We have about 40 minutes so I think I can get through our presentation and probably 30 minutes or less and then we can do some Q&A with the time remaining. Okay. First one is call your attention to our Safe Harbor statement I will be making certain forward-looking statements talking about guidance et cetera and we do have our Safe Harbor statement which I again call your attention to as well as the other statements and risk factors in our public filings.
So, first a quick overview of the ABC is about what HMS does, so it’s about payment integrity and healthcare systems. So, we know only identified errors but we want to make sure that the systems have the right people in the plans, we want to make sure that the plans are being administered properly but our products and services are clearly on the right side of the equation at this point when you are looking at where the current pressures are in the healthcare system. And we are part and parcel of the efforts for payers to make sure that they are paying only what they need to pay and paying it accurately.
And so our role really does focus around addressing payment errors and we do that in a number of different ways. And I’ll put it in two buckets here, one is claims paid by the responsible party, this we call Coordination of Benefits, COB sometimes, TPL there is lots of alphabets (superior). This is about enrollment and in particular in programs like Medicaid with their unique rules Medicaid is by the law of the payer of last resort so for an individual enrolled in Medicaid if you can identify any third-party coverage that they may have you can bill that liable third-party.
And secondly in Medicaid insurance companies PBMs, third-party administrators, the administrators are obliged to corporate with the Medicaid program and that means sharing their source eligibility files with the state or actually how it happens is they are all send to HMS. So we have a process of receiving files from virtually every major insurer standardizing those files and we have the only national eligibility database of this kind.
Against that we can identify people in Medicaid and see if they have third-party coverage. Now Coordination of Benefits is also done in Medicare and its also done in the commercial world but there are different forms around that, so most of what we’ve been talking about the Coordination of Benefits is been in Medicaid. And then a much bigger bucket is claims paid accurately, we call it program integrity, fraud, waste and abuse, payment integrity there is no standard label for that and that’s across every healthcare dollar that can be spent and we’ll go through the spectrum of errors here in a moment but it can be a simple duplicate payment up to excessive Medical Care to non-compliance with plan rules all the way down to spectrum to fraud. So, I referred these two buckets of Coordination of Benefits and program integrity.
Our business model is a rather unique model performance-based service is either small slice of the dollar there that’s because we are about 80% contingency fee in our revenues. And we - that contingency fee model is a very good one, it’s a little bit hard upfront with a new program because you have to fund your expansion with your own working capital but once its up and running you begin to generate millions if not hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars for your clients and that becomes very important to them, it becomes very sticky types of business because they don’t want to put those recoveries at risk and as we all know with healthcare expenditures growing its also a good model because as the expenditures grow your revenues can grow from that.
But the main differentiating factor for us over the longer term is all about performance. And we have to be able to perform better than internal units, competitors, what have you. Multiple growth drivers I’m going to talk in a moment about markets and products and that’s our metrics. We serve different markets. We probably have about 350 clients currently in our contracts and 40 some odd different products and that’s our matrix there. Ideally we would like to have centralized operations on a square-rooted Six Sigma type operation that can feed different markets and have customer facing organizations in those markets that service the clients and do the selling and help influenced where things are going.
And again demonstrated results it’s very quantifiable what we do in both in hard dollars, return back and estimates by our clients that how much in the way of savings that they feel that they achieved from using our products and services. So let’s talk about the markets and our markets are big. So on each of these Medicaid, Medicare and Commercial on the left hand scale you had the expenditures and the programs year by year and then on the right scale in orange is our revenues.
And what you can see is that we’ve been historically a Medicaid company 20, 30 years ago we were working all exclusively in Medicaid doing that Coordination of Benefits type services and over time that expanded into other different products and services. And in 2007 we went into program integrity type services from Medicaid as well.
In Medicare we were only recently made some large advancements there and as you can see in 2012 mainly through the acquisition of a company called HDI, which is the premier Medicare RAC vendor. We’ve increased our space in Medicare but we’ve also one other important contracts which I’ll talk about in a moment.
In the Commercial space which is larger than Medicaid or Medicare is characterized by large internal units at the health plans working on what they call payment integrity, supplemented by a third-party contingency fee vendors and all our products and services that we’ve developed in Medicaid and Medicare our right to bring over into the Commercial world and more and more we are competing head to head with these third-party contingency fee vendors that supplement the internal units at the plan and more and more we can even over time display some of those internal services with a very, very cost effective payment integrity suite of services.
So the opportunity that we have when we start talking about those markets and we look at opportunities in the form of errors and at least the first two segments here Medicaid and Medicare these are projections from CMS. It’s the spend and it’s the error rates that they use and you see you can get well over a $100 billion in errors. I would tell you that all the programs put together right now are addressing a mere fraction of these estimated amount of errors and there is plenty of opportunities to expand into it. It doesn’t happen over night but for one example is the Medicare RAC program which in 2010 identified a little under 95 million of corrections in 2011 it went up to this is their fiscal year ending September.
In 2011 it went up to 950 million thereabouts and just recently in 2012 went up to 2.4 billion that’s identified corrections in the system that came back from providers. And then in the Commercial world we use a 5% number there because there is no definitive source of what is the addressable errors there is a wide range but we use a conservative number.
I want to point out here that you have an excess of $150 billion of estimated errors this is using 2015 was scratching the surface on really approaching all that. So we have a, we have no shortage of market opportunities in which to expand into it’s all about programs and placement and execution against these available set of opportunities.
And when I talk about our products and this is a busy slide but you know we have in the products the two buckets I mentioned before Coordination of Benefits and there are sub products in there a number of them and claims paid accurately or program integrity or payment integrity and host the products in there and new ones we’re adding quite frankly all the time this through internal development or acquisition but the point we are trying to make on the slide is normally that we have a robust portfolio of them that were consistently innovating on is that they are extremely broadly applied.
So the stages that you have down below here first the claim stages we can affect errors at time of enrollment at times of prepayment after a medical claim has been adjudicated by an internal review system that can be sent to us and on a real time basis reviewed against our edit machines and looking for other payment errors that a client doesn’t catch and clearly on post payment and recovery we’ve recover across our business [about] a $4 billion to $5 billion a year in Hard Dollar recoveries that number keeps growing and then these other services the catch errors before they will add $7 billion more.
Our claim types, we have built products and services to allow us to have one of the broadest array of auditing different claim types and ensuring payment and accuracy. So, whether its hospital, physician, pharmacy, DMA you go right down the spectrum there, we have developed products and services to be able to address that. We are not fully penetrated by any means with that across all these products and services but again one of the broadest offerings anywhere in the industry.
Error types, there are many different error types as I alluded to before. It can start at the eligibility part of it when you enroll somebody we’ll reenroll him on a regular basis and then it can go the sorts of errors that are financial in nature, non-compliance with plan rules, where you get also down the spectrum to clinical, where in clinical reviews, we are taking claims, we are getting medical records associated with those claims. We are getting them from skilled clinicians, RNs, certified coders in some cases MDs and we are looking for the excessive medical care, the upcoding these sorts of errors, which are large dollar amounts.
Plan compliance rules and as I say, all the way down the spectrum to fraud and depending upon the client and what they do that could be very – if it’s a government client they can have very formal programs for each component of this, if it’s a commercial client, they can have units that need supplementing anyone of these error types. And as I mentioned that our products and services are applicable across the three major markets, where all healthcare dollars are spent in the U.S.
A word about Medicaid RAC status, so the Medicaid RAC, RAC stands for Recovery Audit Contractor its a program that has been in Medicare for several years. I run pilots in 2005 to 2008 and I began on a national basis in 2010 and I quoted some of the corrections that they have made just before getting up to $2.4 billion in fiscal year ending September 2012.
As part of the ACA, it was also and by the way the Medicare RAC program was put in under Bush and the Medicaid RAC program was put in under Obama so fraud, waste and abuse is one of those few bipartisan issues that you can identify in Washington very few issues. Put in under the ACA obviously there was plans for CMS to implement this and expand it but the Supreme Court decisions around the ACA put expansion in question and so states didn’t move as aggressively as we had hoped on it. And then when the Supreme Court decision basically reaffirmed the ACA then it was a question of the election and the election of Obama more or less cemented this program. So, now, we are very busy implementing this.
So, 2012 is a big procurement year for us. We have 30 contracts, 27 real contracts, three that we are negotiating right now by far the largest Medicaid RAC vendor. This is using a third-party vendor, contingency fee to go after basically fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicaid programs administered by each state but overseen by CMS on a national level. Of those 30 contracts, we have 11 that have been implemented and we are in the stages of implementing 16 more of them.
So, although this program didn’t takeoff in 2012, as we had hoped we did make a much strategic progress in the way of procurements and winning these contracts. Again we are busy implementing them right now. They are contingency fees. We’ll have to spend the money upfront to staff them and work the claims until a stream of revenue begins to develop for them. They are built into our guidance here in 2013.
And 2012, it was a bit of a challenging year for us. I mean, for four years, we had very stable, very consistent growth and results mainly off of our biggest part of our business in the base, which is Medicaid Coordination of Benefits growing nicely in - generally the mid teens over that time period and 2012, some changes, what I call the turmoil in the Medicaid marketplace for us. The level of Medicaid expenditures dropped fairly dramatically. The estimates are somewhere around 2% Medicaid expenditure growth rate and that impacts our growth in our Coordination of Benefits business. Medicaid is a cyclical program. It grew dramatically when the economy hit the skids in 2008 many people lost their jobs, their income dropped and they became eligible for Medicaid. And for example in 2010 expenditure growth was just under 10%, it was about half of that from new enrollment.
As the economy gradually improves we see the growth rate in the lives in Medicaid mitigating a bit only to take off again in 2014 as the ACA Medicaid expansion kicks in, but also states were in their fiscal stride, so they took whatever they could do in the way of cost cutting measures as well. And they did cut reimbursement rates but they, that’s a relatively small impact because Medicaid has the lowest reimbursement rates with any plans anywhere. And they have limits there and there is also a provision in Medicaid to call the maintenance of the effort where they’re not allowed to cut their way too excessively and basically got the provider network in Medicaid.
So the providers going to actually go to courts and they have in some cases got cost cuts overturned in the courts there. But the big milestone event for 2012 was the men of lives they’ve transferred over from state run fee-for-service programs over the Medicaid managed care. And the winners of this are oddly here at the standalone PBMs no longer a standalone but Amerigroup and Centene, Molina plus the units of WellPoint and United, et cetera.
And estimates are around, somewhere around 70% of the lives in Medicaid now are in managed care. That gives us a revenue headwind and that headwind comes from not losing lives because we have most of the states and we’ve virtually had every large Medicaid managed care plan as a client and go down the medium size ones and that’s where the lives have been going.
But initially they managed to spend better and so there is a revenue haircut from that and then there is the scope of services with our average Medicaid managed care plan is less than with the state plan we’ve been selling in the states for 25 years with some of the managed care for only since 2007. But offsetting that on the top-line is the pricing of that’s much more attractive in the managed care marketplace. So the bottom-line impact was somewhat mitigated.
We see in 2013 there debating somewhat we’ll still see more lives moving to managed care but there is simply aren’t enough lives left over to make the same impact as happened in the 2012, plus after these lives have gotten into the managed care plans is some initial disruption that impacts our revenue as well. But after they’re in and they’re settled into it we see a bit of a rebound and we also have the opportunity to expand the scope of services with these plans. So, again a challenge in 2012.
The first point here this 5010/ D.0 issues so they were new standards put in place during 2012 to change the medical claims to be more compliant with the new HIPAA regulations, carriers did adapt to by mid year 2012 the claims that were received from most and large carriers but HMS submits a very unique claim and we’re the country’s largest source of them, they called Medicaid subrogation claims, reclamation claims I’m sorry.
And often at these carriers it’s done on a different system and we had trouble throughout the year getting carriers to adapt their systems to process our claims, we had backlogs and claim processing that held up revenues for us quite a bit. We just had our earnings call last Friday where we’ve declared that we’re essentially behind us now with this issue, but it did reach havoc with our quarterly sales and it’s just a few million more of revenue out there in the HIPAA 5010 transaction and D.0 and only a handful of, of health plans and PBMs that are causing these problems. So we’ve basically worked it down but it was very much a challenge in 2012.
So I had mentioned the 5010 The Slow Medicaid expenditures, the migration of managed care we have two contracts also, during 2012 in addition of when I held those RAC contracts in Medicaid we also won a contract we’re awarded for doing Coordination of Benefits for Medicare rather large contract, non-contingency fee, it’s a cost plus one but a $300 million, roughly $300 million contract over five years. We’re awarded, we started the work and then the award for protested, this protest has complications related to it but it’s processing through CMS and the GAO we gave an update last Friday saying that we still expect the outcome to be for CMS to uphold the award to HMS and that the resolution of this could be in the timeframe between April and September depending upon essentially how long the GAO takes to review the work of CMS when they run through their decision.
So, again we’re confident that we’ll be the winner at the end of this, but this is a large contract that, we originally had about $50 million in guidance for 2012, it will be somewhat less than that and we’ll determine that when we, when we see what the final outcome is. And last (indiscernible) and procurement awards and implementations, I already went through the Medicaid RACs and that how they were delayed in terms of getting implemented because of the Supreme Court decisions and the election states just didn’t move, but we’re seeing a noticeable uplift in our clients and the attention of getting in place the infrastructures to support the ACA, that’s all fronts.
This is our guidance, we just announced again our 2012 actual results and if you take the midpoint range of our guidance you see sort of the growth rates on that. Again 2013 is still a building year for us, we’ve won all these contracts, we have to stand them up and get them implemented. When we get to 2014 we would be able to enjoy full year run rates on these 30 Medicaid RAC programs while the full year run rate on this Medicaid COB contract that is under protest right now. And we should see a resumption in the Medicaid expenditure growth rate somewhere around $8 million, the new lives come into Medicaid and that flows right through our Medicaid Coordination of Benefits business.
So every point, every part of our business is positioned for very, very nice organic growth in 2014 margin expansions and all of them are available. It’s a question of getting through 2013 here and getting these implementations done and now it’s more about execution than what happened to us in 2012 with a lot of external factors impacting the programs that we are working on.
So our strategic outlook, programs growing and expenditures and membership, so fundamentally we know that Medicaid and Medicare are growing for different reasons. Medicare for the demographics and aging baby boomers, Medicaid due to the ACA and the expansion into that and I think we’ll see probably more and more states adopt the expansion there because with the feds paying for most of it. It’s very hard to say no.
But we have obviously the states that have already signed up many on the fence and some who have added and we opposed it but have actually changed their positions notably Arizona and Florida as well. And if they are changing their minds actually probably a leading indicator in my mind or what some states are sitting on the fence would do.
And these marketplaces enjoying a good fundamental organic growth rate in Medicaid and Medicare and commercial should also grow as well but to maybe to a lesser extent, because they don’t have these particular initiatives behind that. But that is very healthy for our organic growth because being contingency fee the growth of the program is sort of the first level of growth that we look at. And then there is scope expansions and yield improvements and other new sales and other aspects that enhance the growth rate.
We can now say something we couldn’t say 18 months ago we are the national leader in both in Coordination of Benefits for Medicaid and Medicare. We’re looking potentially to bring that to the commercial world as well but that’s in pilot phases. And that we are the leading RAC vendor in both Medicaid and Medicare in terms of performance, dollars, amounts of contracts you name it. So, again to be able to say that something we couldn’t say 18 months ago demonstrates at least the strategic progress and the positioning we put ourselves in during 2012.
Commercial world, commercial world we’ve been now signaling that its time for us to look to expand into commercial. And it’s going to be gradual, it’s going to be slow, but we - the capabilities that we built in the government world are very transferable to the commercial world. And we have been selling products and services and are beginning to announce certain contracts that are good indications of this. We’ve announced contracts with Humana; we have some other ones that are potentially in the hopper here that offered to these large internal units of the health plans various tools and support services that can be mainly we sell services but we are beginning to sell prepayment reviews on our and even things like subrogation services reviews on a software SaaS basis.
So, if we’re looking at all the providers and looking at all the errors in Medicaid and Medicare building up these large programs with low cost operations related to it that I would argue gives us a long-term advantage against the current competition in the commercial space, which is very now services highly, highly customized related to it.
And then again the breadth of offering that we have is also very beneficial because when you work with any client replication of looking at errors in a client they have to sort that all out. It gets very complex. They can come to us and we can offer an array of services to really help supplement any configuration that they may have. But that's again commercial market you’ll see some – from us some contract announcements that we've already done and through out the year but it’s really more of an expansion opportunity in 2014 and beyond.
And in emerging eligibly verification opportunities initially for the exchange marketplace actually we have built the product that gives sub-second access, real time access to our eligibly database. So, think if somebody added an enrollment phase, we could tap in and see after they sign away what types of third-party coverage they have or have access to. And we also built an asset verification product that goes through and looks for bank accounts, other assets autos, cars, homes et cetera. And all these are very important criteria to collect that data and then put decision support logic around this to get people through and eligible of a screen or if you’re in exchange to get them to the right program okay.
You may not be able to enroll them there but it that’s who we built it for. Now exchanges on a one this product and service makes great sense for an exchange but they do not need to have that to get up and running and the initial focus of exchanges will be to get up and running and not necessarily by the service this is a real optimizer for them. So, we can see may be more exchange related sales in 2014 and beyond but states need these services today.
We have a contract with MAXIMUS as the enrollment broker in the State of Illinois where we’re a subcontract for the MAXIMUS offering this product and service at time of eligibility it’s getting basically stood up right now as we speak. And the intent there is to make more accurate the enrollment and reenrollment process in the State of Illinois and have people on Medicaid, who are truly eligible for it and if they are not have the information right there on a real time basis.
So, so these are – these are our opportunities in front of us but again I would reiterate that 2012 challenging for us but nonetheless we made enormous strategic progress 2013 a lot more implementing things that we have in hand so there is the standard risk of implementation, which has always been one of our standard risk when people ask what makes you not sleep well at night but we've gotten through these external variables and then when we turn to 2014 we should be harvesting some of these strategic efforts, contract wins, implementations that we’re doing at that stage and growing quite nicely into 2015 as well.
So, let me stop there and so Carl’s joined us? How are you Carl? Nice to see you. And we have about 10 minutes for any questions.
Sure. We’ve got a microphone from the audience.
Okay. Am I clear? Carl could you hear as well.
First question on the Medicaid expansion so originally you passed 60 million and I think most of the estimates and I sort of agree with you 8 million number any view on how you anticipate that's going to roll out so are you…
Thinking 8 million January 1 or is that going to be a…
Yeah, not at all.
Yeah and by the way the 8 million isn’t my number but its recording the most recent from the CBO analysis that came out and again I think that’s going to be a moving target. Actually on our call last Friday, Bill Lucia, our CEO took pains to just tell people that the realities of getting 8 million plus people enrolled or daunting for the states and the managed care plans it’s not that there won’t be many won’t be ready by January 1st but it doesn’t you don’t turn on a switch and all of the sudden 8 million people enrolled in the programs. So it will take time, he did point out that today there are many eligible people for Medicaid who do not enrolled in Medicaid. So think about that in terms of outreach and trying to reach millions of more people related to that.
So we do not see it as well you’ll have 8 million more people even by March or throughout it’s going to be ramping up during 2014 and relating that to us we have the systems that can handle the volumes there that is not an, a huge concern for us although we have to pay attention to that but when it impacts our revenue is this really starting in the second half of 2014 because many of our services are retrospective payment reviews so someone has to get enrolled medclaims, claims have to be paid then they work for our system and there is a time lag associated with that.
So we would see from the expansion our revenues begin to be impacted in the second half of 2014 carrying well into 2015 as well and that depends upon your scenario for, is it going to be 8 million or is it going to be 8 million in 2014 by the end of the year and maybe expanding to some higher number during 2015 as well.
One of the debates around that new Medicaid membership is whether it’s going to be people with having that insurance for years and have tons of tons of demand versus you start a typical 30 year old male who doesn’t have to go see a doctor. So implications for you in terms of what the payment level or the claims level associated with those members it’s been driven is there anything that you seen any specific experience or anything in your data that did review one way or the other?
Yeah, yeah this is a question right for speculation so I will say that we don’t have any hard data on that but as we’ve discussed this yes, so you’re going to people who have the incremental people who are coming into the program have higher incomes and they also have a different classification to be in Medicaid before you would basically have to be associated with the child or be classified as aged, blind and disabled, now it’s basically an income and a asset test.
So you will get a cadre of new members that are different from the quote on quote average person in Medicaid they’re not going to be the aged, blind and disabled which are high-utilizers and who are if I may a large part of that population chronically in Medicaid if you’re really impaired it’s very hard for you to go work and get stay incomes from that. So this new population will be working because they’ll have some income related to it and that is particularly a sweet population for us and the reason being is that when we make our money in Coordination of Benefits it’s not for those who are chronically in Medicaid and don’t have and stay in the program it’s those who rotate on the edges in and out of Medicaid and that churn in Medicaid is very substantial in any given year you could have 5 million to 10 million people churning in and out of Medicaid depending upon what’s going on and those create the renewable set of opportunities for us.
Well this new cadre of people are working they have a higher propensity have third-party coverage. When you get to utilization that’s the big question I would agree with Carl, is it going to be people with because they didn’t have coverage before and that’s not going to be all of them some of them will have maybe a mini plan that they get through their employer and they get a much better plan going into Medicaid but will there be a pent-up demand initially and that will surge utilization but over a longer period of time I think a safe stable and be as that they’re going to have a lower utilization than the average Medicaid participant clearly but if you consider that large aged, blind and disabled population their utilization versus these new folks coming in. So how that will sort out we’re not certain we’ll do some modeling and things our data doesn’t give us for particular insight into that so we’ll read what you read. Yeah.
On the question, on the Medicaid RAC contracts?
So you’ve implemented a 11 of those right will you awarded 30 of them in 30 different states.
Well yeah we have contracts at 27.
And we are negotiating three received awards but don’t have a signed contract.
Got you. And the start-up cost was sort of creating this drag on earnings. How long could that continue as you ramp up to the number?
Yeah. So the early contracts that we won in for example New York and New Jersey I mean these were put into 2011. And so they are part and parcel of being run up and actually we’ve some very good results and can report hundreds of millions of dollars of corrections and recoveries being made there. But these states are also pretty supportive of the effort and going after these dollars with the balance to not put necessary providers and in straights. So these are some of the issues but from us from a pure operating perspective standing up these multiple contracts does way down the margin. So it’s coming from this market place and that’s going to be with us for the majority certainly very heavily in the first half of 2012 and in the second 2013 sorry and in the second half of 2013 beginning to abate as we start to see revenue from these earlier implementations. In 2014 should we have these all stood up then you have a full year run rate with revenues associated with this and of course the margins from this would be much higher.
There is a question in the back there.
Of the 16 you are getting implemented what’s in your guidance for ’13?
Well in our guidance and we’ve broken up revenues into a number of different buckets. One of them being our Coordination of Benefits which we are saying should go about 10% in 2013 and that’s the largest bucket of revenue that we have from our product perspective. HDI which has done splendidly in 2012 we are expecting a 20% growth rate thereabouts in 2013 and that’s because they are contract, they have been growing much faster than that actually recently but high growth rates usually are not that sustainable and it’s a program that’s going through re-procurement this year. So that may have an impact on it. It’s our federal business that as a organic growth of that 10% but then we would add into this Medicare Coordination of Benefits contract which is very sizable much more than the rest of the business combined.
When that starts to kick in and then to your question Medicaid RACs there is a bucket of about $25 million of revenue in 2012 that I referred to as Medicaid program integrity and in that or the RAC programs Medicaid RAC programs and RAC like services that were selling to Medicaid managed care and a little bit of Commercial revenue in there also. That $25 million bucket we’re expecting to grow 25% in 2013 and very much second half waited because of what I described before. Got time for one more.
Sure. You talked about the some of the transition issues going from huge service into managed care as we start to see that with the duals particularly given the higher spending anticipation and back in your guidance it will see the same type of transition issues?
We may not see the same there I mean it’s still remains a question mark I mean clearly there is a transition more of the dollar spend responsibilities going from the Medicare side of the duals over to the Medicaid side. And so far as those dollars go through existing programs with no real changes and again we are not impacted on the Medicare side whereas this transition in Medicare were impacted on one side and pick it up on the other side. This is all dollars coming into Medicaid that are incremental for us.
So from our perspective it’s a net plus and yeah there could be some disruptions that come from that but there is nothing in our revenue stream that it’s coming from it just in that Medicare bucket that we don’t currently get revenues for Coordination of Benefits. Okay. See your time is up. I want to thank everyone for your kind attention. Okay.
Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.
If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: firstname.lastname@example.org. Thank you!