Auto Manufacturing: What Does 'Buy American' Even Mean? 33 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
A common refrain within the discussion of what to do about Detroit is: "Buy American" or "This wouldn't have happened if everyone bought American." Aside from being a bit simplistic if not communist in terms of not allowing people freedom of choice with respect to their buying decisions, it begs another question: "What does buy American even mean in a global economy that is becoming more interconnected on a daily basis?."
After all many foreign cars are not only built in the U.S. but they come with significant domestic parts content, while many so called American cars contain significant foreign parts as well. The Toyota Tundra and Toyota Sienna both made the top ten list of Cars.com list of vehicles with the most domestic content (to qualify a car must contain at least 75% domestic content), whilst popular Japanese cars such as the Accord, Camry and Civic are 60-70% domestic. Technically speaking a Dodge Ram is no more American than a Camry or a Civic if you go by the % of parts sourced domestically, and Explorers, Rams and Chevy Silverados are all actually less American than a Toyota Tundra.
Find below a listing of various cars by % of domestic content; you can read more about Cars.com ratings here, and find the top list here.
(From Cars.com):
Ford F-150: 80% domestic content, down from 90% for '07
Chevrolet Silverado 1500: 85% for '08, down from 90% for '07
Toyota Camry/Solara: 68% for '08, down from 78% for '07
Honda Accord: 60% for '08, down from 65% for '07
Toyota Corolla: 50% for '09, down from 65% for '08
Toyota Matrix: 65% for '09, down from 75% for '08
Dodge Ram: 68% for '08, down from 72% for '07
Honda Pilot: 70% for '09, same as '08
Honda Civic: 70% for '08, up from 55% for '07
Furthermore even if a car that's built outside of the U.S. are still sold at American owned dealers and service centers, my car may be Bavarian but I bought it from an AutoNation dealer and get it serviced at a locally owned business that specializes in BMWs. I also spent money on various after-market upgrades, and all of those parts came from American manufacturers and retailers. The car may be German but I still buy my tires from Sears.
While the buy American only crowd may get irritated if they see someone driving a Toyota Tundra, the fact remains that it's the 5th most American car on the market, and it's built in San Antonio, Texas. Between the parts suppliers, factory workers, U.S. owned dealerships, etc, the overwhelming majority of the money generated by a Tundra sale goes into American hands.
So buy American in this case really means buy from the Americans who work for Detroit as opposed to buy American in general, because millions of American jobs depend on foreign auto makers.
Something else to consider is that competition from the Japanese pushed Detroit to improve quality, design better cars, etc, what would the domestic auto industry be producing if it weren't for that competition? What would the business model look like if we were all subsidizing the bloated, inefficient model of old by all of us deciding to buy American?
Mind you I'm not saying that there isn't any value in supporting American companies, I'm just saying that it's not as simple as buying domestic supports American jobs and buying imports destroys them. Furthermore foreign competition is healthy as far as spurring innovations that benefit all consumers.
At the end of the day it's more productive to push Detroit to develop a viable business model and work on their efficiency issues, than it is to attempt to solve the problem by removing consumer choice. Considering that Honda could out earn GM (even when they were profitable) despite having a fraction of their market share, perhaps the real problem isn't total cars sold as it is an efficiency problem within the domestic automakers.
Detroit already sells more than enough cars to turn a profit, so perhaps the focus should be on their efficiency problem as opposed to the cars our neighbors are driving.
Sources:
Cars.com: "The Cars.com American-Made Index" -- Kelsey Mays, July 1, 2008.
Disclosure: at the time of publishing the author didn't own a position in any of the companies mentioned in this article; the ideas expressed are solely the opinions of the author and shouldn't be viewed as financial or investment advice.
Related Articles
|



















seekingalpha.com/artic...
For those who want to make car parts for Euro and Asian Engineers and Executives, while pretending they are middle class - keep going, your home values (the one you own 10% of) is just starting to reflect your buy global mentality.
FAIR TRADE not FREE TRADE
Don't make the same mistakes that we have made; make sure that you keep the engineering base in the US, once those skills have been lost it will be almost impossible to recover them and maintain a viable industry by developing the models that will meet tomorrow's needs.
www.tundraheadquarters.../
Sorry. All this guy does is accumulate news stories and repost them using "here". This guy drives a "certain brand of German " car and is no friend of GM.
Buying an American BRAND car is simple. Buy one from a company that was created here, has been successful here producing American CAR history. NO trnasplants, no crappy manipulating. The ONLY reason GM , Ford, and Chrysler started getting parts and even some cars produced overseas is because of unfair competition and and needed to do so to try and remain competitive. If our government had quit being the World's protector and benefactor instead of kowtowing to Japan, Germany, and Korea since WWII; we might be in better shape.
On Ross Perot: he joined the board in the early 90s and began going to dealerships, talking to customers, dealers, etc, buying cars, all to gather intelligence on the marketplace and the car buying process. He was ignored by the board and quite out of frustration.
Pricing & Competition: generally speaking Toyotas and Hondas cost more than their Detroit counterparts, especially when you consider that the former don't use anywhere near as many incentives, discounts, etc.
Let's not forget that Detroit was selling many cars for a loss for most of this decade just to get them off the lot.
Perhaps that's the reason they sought out foreign parts, it wasn't so much to remain competitive as it was maintain their business model.
I.e. it's fairly easy to pay $25-$30k for a Camry or an Accord, while it's fairly easy to get a loaded competing model from Detroit for much less.
The idea that Japanese cars are cheaper is based on how the market operated in the 80s, but it hasn't been true for quite some time.
Thanks for reading
-Markham
So it's no different than the real estate business and banks that "hyped" people up on house values and risky loans. Their is no real value or better quality in the mass produced foreign brands. Perception brought on by years of Madison Ave. advertising has taken it's toll. Truth in advertising has become a myth and it wrought more destruction through deregulation by the same people who want "less government" in everything else. The blanket idea of "less government" is also a contributing factor.
1. Do any of these problems have to do with "global warming?" I'd love to know if while we go into a global depression, our environmental pollution improves. If not, there is something important to learn about emissions and politics.
2. Oil men shut down Detroit.
3. Is all of this just a dramatic money-making segue to the next technologies? Do they already exist? Just unloading the old obsolete stuff to make money on it? There are enough cars on this planet to last us til the next new and improved. Just make them affordable for all of the future economically impoverished. Or will the lower class be riding the bus?
Good points, probably both. I'd like to think that if more people drove a car with a 4 cylinder engine we could stave off a lot of green house effect. My dad taught me to be frugal and drove mostly 6 cylinder basic Chevy's with rubber floor covering, no carpet. A heater and AM radio was an option on some of them. Before those Chevys he had a Whippet , Willy's and aa feew others with 4 cylinder engines too. My wife and I both drive 4 cylinder vehicles getting between 18 & 24 mpg city and 26 to 35 mpg highway. My wife's car does have leather seats, so yes, a bit of the luxury bug!
I think we have , again, been deceived and beguiled by Madison Ave advertising for years. That and cheap oil for years. Luxury and performance.... some of us are convinced we "deserve" those lavish extras and status.
My dad and my uncle would declare: "Foolishness!" Perhaps they were right,
I am an American, therefore I have the right to buy any damn car I choose....It's Un American to think otherwise.