Three Value Stocks That Appear Ridiculously Cheap 12 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
I don’t normally buy deep value, preferring instead an approach more like growth at a reasonable price, but three stocks with a real margin of safety have really caught my attention of late.
(1) Pfizer (PFE). The giant drug maker has been under siege for a while now due to fears about the company’s operations. Pfizer's leading drug, Lipitor, goes off patent protection in 2011. But the stock has just gotten ridiculously cheap.
The stock is trading around $12 with $1 in net cash and short term investments. They earned $2.43 last year and analysts are forecasting $2.07 in 2009. That represents a 5-6 forward multiple. We’re talking about an 18% earnings yield on this year’s earnings. This is not some backwater, second rate operation either. This is Pfizer.
Pfizer recently announced the acquisition of Wyeth (WYE) for $50 a share ($68 billion). I really like this move. They are using the current distress in the economy to pick up Wyeth, which has an excellent portfolio of drugs.
(2) Dell (DELL). Dell is trading for about $8.50 with about $3.50 in net cash and short term investments on the balance sheet. You get the business for $5. They earned $1.25 last year and analysts are forecasting $1.12 this year. Even if they only earn $1 that’s a 5 forward multiple. If they earn less, it’s still a cheap stock.
(3) eBay (EBAY). eBay is trading around $10.30 with $1.80 in net cash and short term investments. They earned $1.71 last year and analysts are forecasting $1.44 this year. That’s a 6 forward multiple. Even if they only earn $1.25, that’s a 7 forward multiple.
Each of these stocks is not only cheap, but highly profitable, with high quality of earnings and strong balance sheets with a ton of cash and little debt. None of them are remotely in danger of going out of business.
I think you get a real margin of safety with any of these stocks and I’m happy to hold them for the long term at these levels regardless of any negative short term price action.
No matter what happens with the stock price, the underlying reality is that these are real businesses, in the real world, with real assets and real business operations that continue to earn real profits. As a shareholder, those assets and profits are mine. At these prices, we’re talking about forward earnings yields in the high teens. Negative price action doesn’t have any effect on that.
The technicians can say whatever they want about the downtrending stock prices. What the technicians always miss is that behind these stocks are real businesses. And these real businesses are currently available at compelling valuations.
Disclosure: Top Gun is long Pfizer (PFE) and eBay (EBAY) and has no position in Dell (DELL).
Related Articles
|




















PFE - Integration with Wyeth is going to take a while and may or may not work. While you are probably correct that Pfizer is smart to use its cash stockpile to pick up a new drug pipeline on the cheap, they have other big drugs besides Lipitor that are coming off of patents in the next few years. Their cash cow is drying up and the pipeline has nothing in it. Wyeth may or may not plug that enormous gap. Plus, they really need to execute to meet their aggressive cost savings targets.
DELL - If this is such a great business, why did IBM get out of it? Dell is trying to keep its gravy train growing through efficiency improvements rather than the innovative approach from its rivals. Look at AAPL's valuation and relative market position then tell me that DELL is cheap. See my comment and others at seekingalpha.com/autho... .
EBAY - Probably the least business risk, but will likely suffer with the reeling consumer and show its cyclical nature after years of strong growth. eBay's network effect is beginning to wane as power sellers look for a platform that offers them better terms. Meg Whitman is gone, top line growth is starting to stall and Wall Street hasn't been impressed with the performance of their acquisitions. It's hard to believe that GOOG has less dead goodwill on their books than EBAY. While analysts will normalize earnings, I wonder what the novice investor will think when they finally impair that garbage and post a massive loss.
Even the $2.14 figure is being a bit generous. If you scratch out their Goodwill and "Purchased Intangibles", their adjusted book value becomes $0.85 per share.
Their free cash flows still appear to be in alright shape, but notice the trend of the past four years has been decline. In what is starting to look like a depression, expect that to drop further as consumer PC purchases go down. Realistically speaking, you should brace yourself for a year with $1 or less per share in free cash flows and that might be considered a "good year" 3 years down the line.
Even that wouldn't be all that bad if it weren't for the fact that Dell's business model is not what it used to be. Dell used to make a killing producing high quality computers for reasonable prices. They kept prices low by innovating in areas such as Just-In-Time (JIT) Manufacturing. Yet, their competitors have caught up at this point and the quality of Dell's own computers has suffered over the past few years. Additionally, they are being undercut by low-cost netbooks from companies like Asus.
There's a reason Dell looks cheap. It's going downhill and its future prospects don't look nearly as bright as the past.
Please use something else besides the future, there is too much risk. To say the company has little debt and awesome free cash flow would be a good start, as would my favorite, cost of goods. If COGS are below 50%, a company has huge leeway to trim, even by cutting salaries in the short term. If COGS are 70% or greater, the company must cut production in order to continue cash flow. That's fine as long as large plants aren't involved.
"Three Stocks with a Margin of Safety" on Monday.
Here is again on Tuesday with a different header!
Is this a daily thing until the stocks rise?
Good luck with that!!
Too bad SA doesn't have an analysis rating system so we wouldn't have to read any more of your biased garbage.
I've witnessed it too Patricia013.
I've noticed my screen seems to be a bit "pink" these days while visiting Seeking Alpha anymore. I wonder if they want honest opinions or the same old media controlled garbage? Too bad we are censored so much in this "free" country.
"Three Value Stocks That Appear Ridiculously Cheap"
"Appear" being the key word here.
Dell can be seen as the "solution looking for a problem". Sadly, they are redundant. The real question is, how low can it go?
A good example of how following the usual ratios and figures can be misleading. A "walking around" type analysis - what's actually happening on the ground - can't be beat. In Ebay's case there are lots of astute observations from the front, usually from long time sellers who are saddened and disappointed that EBAY has developed to such a point as to be almost unusable by them. With these sellers' departure, many of the cool and expensive items go, the eyeballs go, the advertising revenue goes - and well, the company follows. Sure, there's still lots of cash in the till and lots of (tacky) items for sale but the trend is strongly downward. There's been such a negative branding developed, that even if top management did the right thing - and quit - Ebay will be a long time coming back to what it was. Sad.
02/27/09 NORRINGTON LORRIE M Exercise 58,334 NA NA
02/27/09 SWAN ROBERT HOLMES Exercise 66,667 NA NA
02/27/09 THOMPSON SCOTT Exercise 8,334 NA NA
02/27/09 AXELROD ELIZABETH LYNN Exercise 46,667 NA NA
02/27/09 DONAHOE JOHN JOSEPH Exercise 127,196 NA NA
02/27/09 JACOBSON MICHAEL RICHARD Exercise 41,667 NA NA
After the disgusting reversal the markets have taken from their highs I've looked else where, stocks starting at the bottom. For the price of one share of the cheapest stock listed above $8.50 I can buy 120 shares of HGUE. It's a penny stock, must be a piece of crap you say, well GM isn't far off and I'll bet HGUE against GM for a winner in the future for best return on your investment!
Solterra Renewable Technologies is new and pretty much unknown at this time – they are growing & they are already headed as the Market Leader for the Flexible Solar Power Industry (FSPI). Why?
Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc. recognized this new dimension they entered was the third generation of solar power and named the technology field FSPI.
They developed the most economical production method for mass manufacturing of high quality Quantum Dots.
The Solterra Cells generate power 24/7 (Yes, that includes night time) from their extended spectrum quantum dots.
Their QD ink jetting is applied to light weight flexible thin film materials of various compositions.
Solterra reduced the manufacturing cost of Cadmium Selenide Tetrapod Quantum Dots by 95% at the same time increased the quality and size standardization for unparalleled consistency.
They are capitalizing on the economies of scale to reduce the $ per watt installed costs.
They recognized and capitalized on cutting edge technology to develop it for the commercial market.
Solterra has international reach and is fostering additional markets.
Less than nine months old and they have Quantum Dots available to purchase for research projects.
Solterra is internally diversified and I See The Light for a very bright future.
I'm not hyping this stock, I'm giving another option for what I believe will be a much better return on your investment. A small interest in the company gets you a lot more shares with a much better return at the price of .07. Remember Dell didn't start out at it's astronomical highs. When was that?
solterrarenewabletechn...
bigthink.com/topics/th...
twitter.com/solterra
laserfocusworld.com/di...
solterrasolarcells.com