Will the EU Fiddle While Eastern Europe Burns? 12 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
"We should not allow that a new Iron Curtain should be set up and divide Europe."
– Ferenc Gyurcsany, Prime Minister of Hungary
Will Germany prove content to fiddle as Eastern Europe burns? The risk seems real.
Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor, knows her party will be facing a tough series of elections this fall. She also knows Deutschland is struggling... and writing a huge check to bail out a clutch of flailing non-German nations would be a deeply unpopular act.
So when Ferenc Gyurcsany, the prime minister of Hungary, proposed a lump-sum Eastern Europe bailout package to the tune of $241 billion, the EU’s richer members spat out their croissants.
In a moment of quiet political panic, Chancellor Merkel stalled. “Saying that the situation is the same for all Central and Eastern European states, I don’t see that,” she said.
Political Will (And Lack Thereof)
This lack of political will helps explain why the U.S. dollar is strong and the euro is in the tank.
The European Union has 27 client states, 16 of which have adopted the euro. The USA has fifty states, all of which use the greenback.
The difference is that, if Washington decides the state of California needs emergency funds, South Carolina can’t fold its arms and say “Yeah, right” (much as it might like to). America’s fifty states are bound together under a unified political system, which makes large fiscal transfers a workable option. The 27 client states of the European Union, on the other hand, do not have the same ties that bind.
This throws a huge monkey wrench into Europe’s flow of funds, as we are seeing now with Germany’s hesitation to do what might be needed. Ms. Merkel does not want to commit political suicide at home for the sake of helping out her poor neighbors. These “political roadblocks” will be thrown up again and again as the EU nations see their broader fortunes diverge.
Iceland Redux?
The thing is, Germany, France, and the other “rich” EU members may ultimately have no choice in the matter. A bailout of Eastern Europe might wind up being a necessity in order to save Western Europe’s banks.
An estimated $1.7 trillion worth of loans (if not more) has poured into Eastern Europe. Out of that fairly large sum, a huge chunk has gone toward foreign-currency-denominated mortgages. Western European banks have done most of this lending, some of them on a staggering scale. According to various reports, one Austrian bank alone has lent sums to Poland, Romania and Ukraine totaling 70% of Austria’s GDP.
This is the same type of mistake made by Iceland’s now-belly-up banks: loading up the boat with exotic mortgages, then sailing forth blithely between the Scylla and Charybdis of repayment risk and forex risk.
And thus, if Eastern Europe goes down the tubes, in all likelihood so do Western Europe’s banks. And if that happens, you can probably kiss the Euro goodbye... and with that, the free movement of people, goods and capital between European borders... and in that scenario Europe on the whole is pretty much toast.
So I hate to break it to you, Chancellor Merkel, but you should think pretty seriously about writing your neighbors that bailout check. (Unless, of course, you’re willing to deal with the political consequences embedded in a potential full-on collapse of the European banking system.)
Related Articles
|

























This article has 12 comments:
Rich EU Euro-zone countries must admit that an integration of Eastern European countries into a "United Europe" was not a good idea. The differences are so huge that bridging them is close to impossible.
Consequently, these rich Euro-zone countries have to fix their own economies, take losses, and move forward using sound and realistic policies.
The same is going for the USA. The government must allow free-market processes to resolve its financial & economic catastrophe. The government must assure that the process although painful is still "orderly" providing an adequate support for most vulnerable segments of American population.
Failed financial institutions, banks, and business enterprises must go clearing spaces for successful ones. The Great Depression has taught people a simple lesson: do not put good money into bad money endless pits.
1. According to the Bank of International Settlements, the total foreign debt of Emerging Europe (EU-10, Russia, Turkey) is 1,6 trillion USD. According to the World Bank, their GDP is 3,5 trillion USD. Would you get stressed if the TOTAL mortgage on your family home was 1/3 of your annual income?
2. Emerging Europe (EU-10, Russia, Turkey - population 320 million) has short-term foreign debt of 375 billion USD. By contrast, Ireland (population 4 million) has short-term foreign debt of 447 billion USD. Would you feel profligate if you credit card bill was 1/100th of your neighbour's?
The Eastern Europeans have low national debt and large foreign reserves (T-bills, sterling, eurobonds), yet according to S&P, the new European Union members' debt is junk and Ireland is AAA-rated.
The GDP of Emerging Europe is 3,5 trillion USD and China has GDP of 4,2 trillion USD. The Eastern Europeans have strong infrastructure, excellent education and massive natural resources. Yet the Chinese will save the world with a fraction of the Eastern European's schools, roads, gas and electricity?
What is it that the media hates about Eastern Europe so much? Why are there no articles by Eastern Europeans published?
Not to mention politicians who thought they are going to beat the US.
Now something has to give.
Thank you for introducing facts into the stream of ignorance that continually pours into almost all American commentary concerning Eastern Europe. It would take a bulldozer to cut through all the ignorant sludge that passes for knowledge and thinking about this area by my fellow citizens.
If only the casinos that pass for banks in the U.S. and most of Western Europe were as conservatively run as those in East Europe, the world would not be in this titanic banking crisis.
On Mar 05 06:33 PM Dragoman wrote:
> Another feeble Eastern Europe article in SA. Does anyone study primary
> sources anymore or just regurgitate other ill-informed blogs? <br/>
>
> 1. According to the Bank of International Settlements, the total
> foreign debt of Emerging Europe (EU-10, Russia, Turkey) is 1,6 trillion
> USD. According to the World Bank, their GDP is 3,5 trillion USD.
> Would you get stressed if the TOTAL mortgage on your family home
> was 1/3 of your annual income?
>
>
> 2. Emerging Europe (EU-10, Russia, Turkey - population 320 million)
> has short-term foreign debt of 375 billion USD. By contrast, Ireland
> (population 4 million) has short-term foreign debt of 447 billion
> USD. Would you feel profligate if you credit card bill was 1/100th
> of your neighbour's?
>
> The Eastern Europeans have low national debt and large foreign reserves
> (T-bills, sterling, eurobonds), yet according to S&P, the new
> European Union members' debt is junk and Ireland is AAA-rated.<br/>
>
> The GDP of Emerging Europe is 3,5 trillion USD and China has GDP
> of 4,2 trillion USD. The Eastern Europeans have strong infrastructure,
> excellent education and massive natural resources. Yet the Chinese
> will save the world with a fraction of the Eastern European's schools,
> roads, gas and electricity?
>
> What is it that the media hates about Eastern Europe so much? Why
> are there no articles by Eastern Europeans published?
are dealing with facts and fact is with the exception of Ukraine, Eastern Europe is in good shape, much better than the socalled rich EU-Countries.
Ireland who tried to beat the US in "Worst capitalist" is a dead man walking and the UK is not much better (thank god the Tommies don't have the Euro)
As to Germany, Merkel is right and the real game plan is to leave that monstrum of 27 members and get back to the Elite-Club with Germany,Austria,France... .