Tuesday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets 16 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
<< Return to page 1 - Short-Term Overbought
Many posters were pretty upset by the details of the AIG bailout. While Obama and politicians make a stink about $165M in bonuses to a variety of AIG employees, the real deal is the nearly $100B given to Wall Street and overseas banks in the bailout. This is the most upsetting thing I’ve seen in quite some time. It occurred on Bush’s (Paulson—the conflicted one) watch and is continuing under the new administration. The details are in this NY Times article. It should make your blood boil.
Markets rallied early on momentum carry-over from last week and the overnight action in Asia and Europe. The G-20 meeting results were a non-event but spun to suit bulls. Bernanke’s repeated prediction that the recession will end this year IF the bank situation is resolved added further happy talk for bulls' consumption.
Let’s get real. We’ve still got a severely oversold stock market from long term views. The rally we’ve experienced until this afternoon has led to short-term overbought conditions. It’s just that simple. Sometimes the chatter from TPTB can only do so much.
Let’s see what happens.
Disclaimer: Among other issues the ETF Digest maintains positions in IEF, TLT, GLD, USL and DBB.
The charts and comments are only the author’s view of market activity and aren’t recommendations to buy or sell any security. Market sectors and related ETFs are selected based on his opinion as to their importance in providing the viewer a comprehensive summary of market conditions for the featured period. Chart annotations aren’t predictive of any future market action rather they only demonstrate the author’s opinion as to a range of possibilities going forward.
Related Articles
|






















Time to welcome the bears back to the market now.
1. I lost billions buying some crappy financial instrument like CDS from, say, AIG and other cohorts.
2. Give me billions, tax payers, so that I can stay in business. I am too big to fail.
3. So, I got billions of tax payers’ money.
4. AIG as well as all the cohorts also got billions of tax payers’ money.
5. Since and AIG and all the cohorts are flush with tax payers’ money, take back from me those crappy financial instrument and pay me in full.
6. Now, AIG and all the cohorts including me got back those crappy financial instruments, I am in poor house again. Tax payers please make me full again by giving me billions.
7. And, the cycle goes on again.
Under the guise of too big to fail, we tax payers are continue to be taken for suckers. It is still not too late to:
1. Stop bailing them out.
2. Sell off various parts of the failing financial institutions in piece meal under the government supervision.
3. Give back the tax payers first whatever that can be recovered from the sale.
4. If there is any left, let the other stakeholders have them.
In a capitalist society, when the price is right, i.e., cheap enough so that some pieces of these failing institutions can be made profitable, there will be someone who would buy them and make money from them. In doing so, most of these pieces will be healthy again and making money by themselves without any more of tax payers’ money.
Bernanke said very well. I believe this is what he meant: When the politicians do not have the will to go against the self interests of the financial biggies, neglecting the well being of the all the rest including us the tax payers and who put them in office, we will never solve the problem.
On Mar 17 07:27 AM unfaire wrote:
> 1. I lost billions buying some crappy financial instrument like CDS
> from, say, AIG and other cohorts.
Out of curiosity, I clicked on your link for the novel word "sheeple" to see its "formal definition", and was appalled see:
".... elete group."
"To accept the group mentaility....."
One would have hoped that those who presume to post an on-line dictionary would first learn to spell!
For finding the right broker for the stock visit stockscompare.com
Industrial metals and oil are interesting. They both are trying to reverse the downtrend, and with stocks of copper and oil reducing, I suspect a long position soon (oil now, even) will pay good rewards.
The financials are key: until they get sorted, and nationization in all but name is a very probable outcome, the markets can't turn around. So ... keep your gold but don't ignore the non-shiny and liquid stuff too.
On Mar 17 07:27 AM unfaire wrote:
> I opposed the TARP. I smelt something fishy from the very beginning.
> It turned out that I was right. Most of those who got the TARP money
> are double dipping, or even triple dipping. It goes this way:
> 1. I lost billions buying some crappy financial instrument like CDS
> from, say, AIG and other cohorts.
> 2. Give me billions, tax payers, so that I can stay in business.
> I am too big to fail.
> 3. So, I got billions of tax payers’ money.
> 4. AIG as well as all the cohorts also got billions of tax payers’
> money.
> 5. Since and AIG and all the cohorts are flush with tax payers’ money,
> take back from me those crappy financial instrument and pay me in
> full.
> 6. Now, AIG and all the cohorts including me got back those crappy
> financial instruments, I am in poor house again. Tax payers please
> make me full again by giving me billions.
> 7. And, the cycle goes on again.
> Under the guise of too big to fail, we tax payers are continue to
> be taken for suckers. It is still not too late to:
> 1. Stop bailing them out.
> 2. Sell off various parts of the failing financial institutions in
> piece meal under the government supervision.
> 3. Give back the tax payers first whatever that can be recovered
> from the sale.
> 4. If there is any left, let the other stakeholders have them.<br/>In
> a capitalist society, when the price is right, i.e., cheap enough
> so that some pieces of these failing institutions can be made profitable,
> there will be someone who would buy them and make money from them.
> In doing so, most of these pieces will be healthy again and making
> money by themselves without any more of tax payers’ money.
> Bernanke said very well. I believe this is what he meant: When the
> politicians do not have the will to go against the self interests
> of the financial biggies, neglecting the well being of the all the
> rest including us the tax payers and who put them in office, we will
> never solve the problem.
But you will have to make as much noise about the $100B as the $160 million has caused - proportionally would be even better.
String up the regulators and the leaders, anywhere, everywhere, Bush or Ombama side, and all the "businessmen".
However, regardless of what they knew and encouraged, winked at and said get on with it; or what they knew and tried to stop but couldn't; God knows what happened and the "evil doers" will certainly get what's coming to them. You can bank on it.
Does anyone have a good source on where to monitor if the Treasury is buying back its own bonds?