Arena Pharmaceuticals: Near Term Gamble May Be Worth It 33 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Arena Pharmaceuticals (ARNA) is supposed to release phase 3 data on its new obesity drug, lorcaserin, at the end of March 2009. Data from this first of three ongoing Phase 3 trials will likely cause a big move in the stock. Buying the stock based on the expectation of good news would at first seem to be a pure gamble.
At second glance it might be better than that. The stock is currently at $4.43. It has just rallied off a bottom which has good technical support (approx. $3.90 to $4). On Feb. 12, 2009, the stock had reached a near term high of $7.42. At about that time, the market really started to tumble. It could be argued that ARNA simply tumbled with the market. Hence the recent top may be a more accurate reflection of its somewhat speculative worth. Since the market has not yet rallied significantly, it is a very positive sign that ARNA has rallied by 10+%. Yet this is still a very questionable reason to invest.
Let’s look at the competitors. There seem to be three major new obesity drug candidate companies. They seem to all be developing in roughly the same time line. Vivus (VVUS) announced good results from a phase 3 trial of its obesity drug candidate, Qnexa, on Dec. 11, 2008. Orexigen Therapeutics (OREX) announced “mixed” results from a clinical trial of its obesity candidate drug, Contrave, on Jan. 9, 2009. OREX argued that its results still do meet FDA benchmarks for approval.
The fact that both of these companies reported at least decent results would tend to argue that the likelihood for a good result from ARNA is high. In addition, ARNA announced on Feb. 18, 2009 an initiation of a Phase 2 clinical trial of an orally administered niacin receptor agonist drug candidate to treat atherosclerosis (a collaboration with Merck (MRK)). Furthermore, at least one analyst has recently increased his estimate for the value of ARNA’s obesity drug in the market. These things should give ARNA significant upside potential in the near term.
Looking again at the technical picture, the expectation for the extent of the near term price rise due to good Phase 3 results by ARNA would be the recent top put in February 12, 2009 -- $7.42. It could go higher, but $7.42 would be a technical resistance point. The expectation for a “mixed” result might be about $3, which was approximately the base of the Oct. 2008 low. It seems unlikely that a completely negative result will be reported. Some hint of that would have leaked out by now. Plus the competitor companies’ results simply do not argue for this as a significant possibility.
In sum, it looks like there is a “most likely” potential for a $3 gain, while there is a “less likely” potential for a $1.50 loss. Stops at $3.70 might be able to curb some of the loss, if there is one. Overall this investment seems like a good bet to make in the current market. Good news from ARNA could swamp out almost any further bad news from the markets. Plus if the markets started to rally significantly, ARNA could shoot through the roof on further appreciation due to the overall market rally. A near term price appreciation to the $11 to $12 range is not technically out of the range of possibility.
With all of this in mind, Arena looks like a better gamble. It’s all really about “risk/reward”. Naturally if you feel strongly that the overall market is going to fall 20% in the next 20 days, you probably do not want to take this gamble. If you feel a mixed (or even a good) performance of the overall markets for the rest of March is more likely, this investment possibility may have some appeal. Many analysts are forecasting at least a slight rally after the huge recent fall. This might occur at a sweet spot for this investment opportunity.
Disclosure: Long ARNA.
Related Articles
|





















However, even though they think the drug will be successful, they thought it was too big a risk to bet on before the results of the phase 3 trial. They thought it might decline to $1 on a bad result. They thought $8 might be a day of the news target for ARNA. This sounds remarkably similar to my comments with one difference. I thought there was very little chance for a totally negative result. At worst it should be a mixed result (i.e. marginally successful). I estimated that the stock might go down to $3 in that case. Perhaps this is an underestimate. However, Zacks did seem to agree with me that the phase 3 trial was very likely to be a success. They cited the fact that there have been no warning indications.
I don't pretend to be the world's most expert biotech analyst. However, I was around U.C. Berkeley and UCSF when a lot of the major Biotech's got started. I have also followed Biotech stocks for years. There is no saying exactly what any stock will do on any on a given day. A lot of times the actual result may be impacted by the behavior of the overall market that day. However, the Zacks figure of $8 seems much closer to my estimate than the much larger spike you are indicating.
I clarify that my estimate was only meant to indicate the price of the stock at the time of the release of good news for this first phase 3 trial. It was not meant to indicate the price of the stock when the drug is finally approved. Presumably this price would be higher.
I feel somewhat vindicated by Zacks comments. I think your tone is excessively insulting. I do acknowledge that there may be some short covering. I was aware ARNA was shorted. Again it is hard to predict the exact effect of this in a generally declining market though. Many people may chose to remain short temporarily to allow the market (and the normal retracement after such an announcement) to bring the stock price back to them. The figures I see for short interest currently are 19.55% of float short (4.6 days to cover).
If the result is "fantastic", then I would tend to agree that the rise should be much more than the amount that I was suggesting. However, I think I indicated that also.
This is nonsense. Magangement can't say anything either way in advance of the data, so this type of statement is ludicrous and misleading.
Saying " I was around U.C. Berkeley and UCSF when a lot of the major Biotech's got started." is about as stupid as my saying I was around when the Broncos won 2 superbowls so I'm a great quarterback. Ludicrous!
I'd have more respect for your opinion if you had complete a PhD.
What I have heard online and other places more or less agrees with what the Zacks' article said. The Zacks' article is on SeekingAlpha if you are interested.
As for how much the stock might rise on a good result. It likely depends on the "goodness" of the result and on the actual market action on the day of the announcement. If my estimate was offending you, I'm sorry. I was simply going off the technical charting info and other analysts' comments that I read online. I make no claims to being able to peg the exact extent of the rise on a good result. For the moment, other knowledgeable analysts seem to be agreeing with me about the ballpark for the amount of rise to expect on the phase 3 results news. If your result prediction becomes a reality, you can say I told you so.
You can look at this as a warning to stay away or as a buying opportunity, since the stock is down on the downgrade today. i tend to see it as a buying opportunity. Canaccord Adams has reinforced my belief that the drug will be successful. Anytime you are trying to fool the brain function with a drug which may mediate effects in the Hypothalmus, there is always a possibility of side effects. This is not news. In fact if there are not serious side effects, this may mean that the drug will work very well indeed.
My opinion is overall unchanged by Canaccord Adams downgrade. I also cite the Zacks article in which they state side efffects are unlikely.
For my part, I have always thought the side effects issue was the more likely to be the "gotcha" for lorcaserin. I do think the drug should be successful in its objective. I am hoping that side effects turn out to be a non-issue as the Zacks article suggests.
I actually expect the results to be substantially better than that. I can see no reason for the stock to fall through the floor prior to the announcement. I do not buy the side effects argument, although it is a possibility. All this has been known for some time. It is always possible Canaccord Adams could have some insider information that they are not sharing with us. I just don't think this is the case. The hold rating by Zacks seems much more appropriate. For those with a bent to take a risk on a potentially great drug, ARNA is a buy. I am looking for a bounce back upward tomorrow, providing the market doesn't implode again.
These huge type of option positions may be the reason behind Canaccord Adams downgrade of the stock. They may wish to avoid paying out on a lot of $5 call options that expire in March. Perhaps I am too cynical. Then again, perhaps I am not.
You can call me cynical, but there may be some pressure exerted to keep ARNA below $5 through Friday, which is the options expiration day. That way some people can avoid paying off on the naked March $5 calls they may have sold (i.e. perhaps brokerage houses).
As part of this article a video showed an interview with one of the "successful" cases of the ARNA lorcaserin trial. He had dropped 50lbs within a year. He seemed very pleased with the drug. The video went on to state that probably not all patients will respond favorably to the same drug, so there is likely room for all three of the new drugs in the market (Vivus' and OREX's too). Overall, I think you have to view this video as great news for ARNA.
ARNA apparently is not going to release results regarding vulvopathy at this point. Still good to great weight loss results should cause the stock to shoot up considerably. Remember there are a lot of shorts, so there should be some short squeeze effect (about 20% of the float is short).
1) ARNA can only sell an added 20% of its stock under this agreement, so the possible dilution is limited.
2) ARNA will sell its stock at a slight discount to the market value. However, it basically gets to dictate 10-day periods in which the stock must be bought (over an 18 month period of the agreement). It could ask Azimuth to buy its stock during relatively high periods.
3) ARNA is not required to sell all (or any of this stock). It can simply require Azimuth to buy its stock at a discount during this period. The cap amount it can require Azimuth to buy is $50M. The cap amount in shares that ARNA can sell is 14,838,891 shares of common stock (about 20% of the current amount of stock on the market).