Ford: Convertible Trust Not Preferred 17 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Co-Written by Patrick Kirts
Last fall Portfolio Asset Management discussed the merits of the 6.50% Cumulative Convertible Trust Preferred Security (F-PS). This trust was also known as Ford Motor Company Capital Trust II. The idea was simple, get paid while you wait for Ford to do nothing but keep on trucking. Well, last week we found that like the homeowners that bought too much house and asked the banks to lower their mortgage rate, Ford (F) just can’t pay for their preferreds.
Ford made headlines this week with its announcement to retire up to 40% of its debt--over $10B--through the combination of a cash and equity conversion offer to its bondholders. Some bondholders rejoiced as Ford is offering 30 cents on the dollar for bonds previously trading for 20 cents on the dollar. The common stock price sank due to the reality, not fear, of dilution. This is good for the company, since they will avoid bankruptcy, but not good for those expecting interest paid on time. We have maintained for months that Ford is in a much better financial situation than its rivals GM and Chrysler. However, while the news may be music to the ears of bondholders, a small, little-commented-upon provision of Ford's announcement leaves owners of the Ford cumulative convertible preferreds singing the blues.
That little provision states that starting April 15, the date of its next dividend payment, Ford will suspend payment on its 6.5% Cumulative Convertible Trust Securities (F-S) for a period of up to five years. Now, Ford will have to pay those missed dividends, but for the moment it preserves cash, as the company reorients itself to new economic realities. The last time Ford made an offer for F-S was back on July 2, 2007 when they offered to convert the shares and add a $14.25 kicker, paid in stock, to retire the shares. I would have been happy for a similar payoff, but in this case nothing was offered but hope for the future.
The logic of owning preferred shares in this environment is simple: As stock prices decline, the bigger dividends on preferred shares offer higher cash flow than the common, and have more liquidity than bonds. As long as the firm limps along, you get paid to wait. Last fall, when the question was who of the big three automakers would live, we had a simple answer: only Ford. So far, we are right, but Ford’s decision to stop the dividend payments to this particular security forces us to deal with reality now.
Owners of Ford preferred shares must make a choice. They can wait for Ford to resume payments--if it ever does, or sell now. The suspension of payment forces one to seriously consider additional potential risks. What separates Ford from GM and Chrysler is not better business fundamentals, it is liquidity. Ford still has the money to deal with mounting losses, without going to the government trough. But as the entire industry continues to decline, until it reinvents itself, one must wonder if this difference will still be there in a year or two as losses continue to mount. Ford may face the same crisis as its rivals before the economy recovers and people start buying cars again in profitable numbers. If this scenario comes about, then it won't matter if one waits to collect the dividends--bankruptcy, or even worse, nationalization, could wipe out any prospect of ever getting paid. In the meantime, the price of the preferreds may continue to slide, or even go to zero. The least risky move right now is to sell Ford preferreds, and there is certainly no reason to buy.
Stock position: None.
Related Articles
|






















"then it won't matter if one waits to collect the dividends--bankruptcy, or even worse, nationalization, could wipe out any prospect of ever getting paid."
Okay, so Ford will avoid bankruptcy but don't own the preferreds as they may go bankrupt. Good thing you only have two hands.
You picked up on a part of the game most people miss out on. I thought the OID issue was too thick for most readers. Clearly you were the first out the gate to see some issues with it. All I can say is keep using your brain. Most people never read the prospectus.
Lee Munson
On Mar 10 12:32 PM Wren337 wrote:
> I'm surprised you didn't mention the OID conversion on the F-S shares.
> Now that the dividends are accumulating they are being treated like
> a zero coupon from a tax perspective. Holders can expect to get
> a 1099-OID for the dividend they did not receive. It should cost
> most people about $1/ year out of pocket to hold F-S, unless they
> are held in a retirement account. It's spelled out in the IPO very
> clearly.
These things broke my heart. I had dreams up picking them up at 100% payout and holding on for a few years (in a non-retirement account). I was reading through the IPO to look at the deferment terms when I happened on the OID conversion. Holding a significant number of these could really kill you.
On Mar 12 10:18 PM Lee Eugene Munson wrote:
> Very NICE!!!!
>
> You picked up on a part of the game most people miss out on. I thought
> the OID issue was too thick for most readers. Clearly you were the
> first out the gate to see some issues with it. All I can say is keep
> using your brain. Most people never read the prospectus.
>
> Lee Munson
They broke my heart too. After offering a 50% premium to some of the other debt, they offer nothing but hope and deferred payments. While it could all work out in the end, it was a disappointment. This is a good case for diversification and position limits. Even for a professional trader, these are important lessons.
Lee
If you like Ford, the F-S is a better vehicle than F assuming they continue to trade at the 2.825/1 ratio. The taxes you pay waiting for the dividend seems to be a reasonable price for the probability of the accrued dividends and interest, and worst-case you're "at the table" upon dissolution with a $50 per share subordinated claim.
Where's my logic burp?
Lee, there are lots of reasons to buy -- like a 40% nominal yield, assuming they don't go BK, and huge potential upside for those with patience. Only if F goes BK, with the subordinated debt totally wiped out, is this a loser. Looks like a good bet to me.
On Mar 20 05:36 PM egodruid wrote:
> If you like Ford, the F-S is a better vehicle than F assuming they
> continue to trade at the 2.825/1 ratio. The taxes you pay waiting
> for the dividend seems to be a reasonable price for the probability
> of the accrued dividends and interest, and worst-case you're "at
> the table" upon dissolution with a $50 per share subordinated claim.
>
>
> Where's my logic burp?
Secondly does anyone know how to go about converting these into F? I haven't bee able to get anyone at Ford to call or email me back.
Thanks.