Former GM Board Member: 'I Told You So' 40 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Kirk Kerkorian's former watchdog on General Motors' (GM) board of directors is apparently dying to say "I told you so" when discussing GM's faulty strategy. Said strategy is currently costing taxpayer billions to keep the zombie car maker on life support. Jerry York however, had little to say about how Tracinda lost boatloads of money in failed investments with both GM and Ford (F) over the past several years. In an interview with Reuters, York had this to say:
"All of the data I've seen on GM would indicate that at the end of the whole operational restructuring, they would have piled up so much debt. In many respects they would be back where they are today," York told Reuters in an interview late last week and published Tuesday.
York, who hightailed it out of GM's BOD after the company refused to submit to Kirk's demands for an alliance with Renault-Nissan (NSANY) is part of the chorus against a full-blown GM bankruptcy.
"It is not inconceivable that the federal government could decide to orchestrate a cram-down, quickie bankruptcy filing," York told Reuters.
He added: "I personally believe it would be deplorably bad to have a company the size of GM go through a normal bankruptcy process at this time. With the unemployment rate being so high, the carnage in the financial markets, it's going to make the markets substantially worse."
"There are no great choices here," he said. "There are only bad choices. The question is what is the least bad choice."
All of this is great, however not surprisingly York does not talk about Tracinda's horrendous timing of getting involved in both GM and F, both investments ending up a massive loss for Kerkorian, which coupled with Kirk's other recent flop in MGM (in which Kirk has personally pledged his shares in order to fund a revolver that was used to buy Ford shares) probably should send a message to Tracinda's owner that it might be time to call it a day on his "stock picking" career.
Related Articles
|





















I take it from your comments that you don't think very much of Wall Street. Well, I can tell you that most Americans don't hold Detroit in very high regard, either.
I believe it is instructive that the bulk of our new president's appointees own vehicles made by foreign owned manufacturers. Our domestic automakers have a lot of work ahead of them if they're going to survive the public's present perception of their products.
The only thing I know for sure is that name calling and class warfare will lead to the eventual demise of your industry, if not our entire society. There's plenty of blame to go all the way around, and your continued vitriol certainly isn't helping any, much less contributing to the search for viable solutions.
I confess I don't know the answers, and I suspect no one else does, either. I do fear the regulations, mandates and other strings that Wahington will attach to their funding may only make things worse, however.
Ford's work with the Rocky Mountain Institute is another "bet" that will pay off in 2010.
On Mar 11 10:44 AM ChemEn3 wrote:
> Why is Ford in better shape than GM and DCX? Is it because there
> is some master minds at work there?
>
> Look up "Ford Bets the Farm." Just before the credit markets crashed
> Ford mortgaged everything. They took out huge loans using every
> piece of land,equipment, and factory they had.
>
> Then the credit market collapsed, and GM and DCX could not refinace
> thier debt, while Ford had loads of cash on hand. Because of the
> market collapse, GM and DCX cannot do the same thing Ford did.<br/>
>
> Ford is in good shape cash wise, but they have a boat load of debt
> that will come due soon. I hope they come out ok, but I wouldn't
> bet on it.
I vote for GM's survival and expect the volt, and other innovative cars to prevail. I rejecttheidaea ofa costly bankrupcy with large legal fees that make the laweyers even wealthier. I expect the bailout money to come through and hope GM seeks veture capital.
My Mustang was designed in 1996 and it's still a great pleasure to look at it. It drives like a dog but for little money you can make it run great and after that it's really yours.
On Mar 11 10:40 AM seattle_mike wrote:
> CH11 for GM would be a disastor. For the record, I think GM has
> some sharp cars. Everyone is on the foreign car bandwagon.... at
> least take a look at a GM. Any GAP in quality these days is minimal
> at best. GM is making some great vehicles. Do you really want to
> see them fail? Say adios to our steel industry and part suppliers
> then too. The US will be in grave danger if the automotive industry
> were to fail. Think of prior wars, GM was able to quickly shift
> production to support the war and this nation. We will need the
> assistance of the Big 3 again in the future. You can bet on it.
A couple of years ago they asked Warren Buffett why he didn't buy GM, which he could have swung relatively for pocket change. He answered that the problem was their debt and unfunded financial liabilities, which made the idea prohibitively expensive. He didn't see how anyone could make money from such a venture.
One would have to conclude he knew what he was talking about as our entire nation now continues to wrestle with this dilemma.
The author of this post may not be as expert as you might like on this subject, but that simply begs the question of WHO IS? I can assure you there are millions of American taxpayers out here who would like the answer to that question.
As for the Volt, you're kidding yourself if you believe this radical new vehicle is going to be a commercial success, much less save its ailing car company. I take no joy in saying this, but there are dozens of sound reasons as to why this is a practical impossibility.
I believe our friends in Detroit are really trying to turn their ship around, perhaps for the first time in our lifetimes. We'll see how it all comes out presently.
I do have a question about your rant, however. How come when the Detroit 3 fly their jets to Washington it's so unbecoming, while Nancy (Pelosi) and the Governors get a pass when they do the same thing?
Someone needs to explain the logic in that to me.
On Mar 12 01:11 PM Teutonic Knight wrote:
> Well, even a wizard and tough guy like Kerkorian couldn't fix them
> (GM and Ford), best of luck to the Obama regime.
York wasn't the first one with this idea. It's the only logical solution. But it probably won't happen quickly if it's designed in Congress. That's why we need a Car Czar.