Ford and UAW Working Together 10 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Perhaps the biggest story of the last week concerning the U.S. automakers has gone by without my fanfare at all. Ford (F) has come to a labor agreement with the UAW that will allow for it to compete much more effectively with the foreign automakers. While Ford will never be able to pay workers what foreign manufacturers pay their overseas work force, they are starting to come down to what the foreign makers pay their American plant workers. Some details were released Wednesday, according to CNBC’s Phil Lebeau:
Ford has just ended a conference call outlining details behind the new contract that it has reached with the UAW. Remember just a couple of days ago, 59% of the members agreed to modify their contract with Ford making it the first of the big three to change its labor contracts. The one highlight that is going to get a lot of attention today is how much this lowers the hourly labor costs for Ford. Remember, there’s been some reports in the past that Ford, GM and Chrysler were all paying $70, $80 an hour to UAW members. Ford now believes with this agreement and once you strip out the the retirement healthcare trust, this agreement will lower Ford’s hourly labor costs down to $55 an hour.
For some comparison, the transplant auto companies, the foreign auto companies in the U.S. They’re at $48 or $49 and Ford believes, if you factor in work rule changes and productivity changes in the UAW agreement, that they will be at parity with the foreign automakers in the call that just ended. There’s going to be a buyout offer to Ford UAW members starting April 11th. This is part of the company trying to bring down the number of hourly workers.”
Management at Ford is outshining their counterparts at GM and Chrysler, as they are making the moves that must be made. This is the sort of reorganization that must be accomplished by each of these struggling companies. Ford is going through the same sales troubles that all of the others are, but they apparently did a better job of articulating the importance of UAW concessions to making the company healthy again. Also remember, Ford has rejected government funding to-date.
Related Articles
|





















One small point that the author fails to make is that in negotiations with the union, one of the three companies typically takes the lead, I expect to see GM and Chrysler workers ratify similar agreements by the end of the month, which is the deadline that the government has set. It's not that Ford is doing anything better than the other 2 in this respect, they just were the first to negotiate.
Giving back is relative. If you have COLA then giving back is not getting a COLA raise, which few in this country get. If you have total health care coverage then giving back is not getting a 10-15% raise in health care expenses every year. And so on. The UAW baked in so many automatic raises that just staying even was considered a big give back to this crowd.
The fact is the big 3 could fill their plants with happy, productive, and grateful workers for a quarter of what they pay the UAW extortionists. And still the UAW radicals complain.
In small ways there may be differences, but not much. In a matter of days the others will follow suit.
Here's a little factoid for the terminally naive, the idea of the hated JOBS Bank was 'pioneered' by Ford and spread to the other two some years ago. Appeasement is not the way to deal with the UAW.
The most important is to get back the confidence of the American consumers.
If they keep making the same unwanted products, the end result will be the same - - Bailout !!
The younger generations are the hardest to convince.
Not easy !!
First, I recall that, as a result of an agreement a year or so ago, there was supposed to be a two tiered pay structure with the janitors being paid $28 per hour and the assembly line worker being paid $51 per hour. Is that still true and are these numbers the cash compensation without benefits?
Second, does the new union owned and operated benefit trust assume all liabilitiies for both pensions and health benefits for retired union people?
Third, what do the auto companies contribute per hour into this fund for their active union employees?