AIG Suddenly Takes the Full Disclosure Route 12 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Late Sunday, AIG, which all of a sudden "recognizes the importance of upholding a high degree of transparency with respect to the use of public funds", finally caved to pressure to disclose the full list of recipients (.pdf) benefiting from collateral payments after its repeated rescues.
No major surprises among the bank recipients: the top 5 include Societe Generale (SCGLY.PK), Deutsche Bank (DB), Goldman Sachs (GS), Merrill Lynch (MER) and Calyon. Additionally, of the top 20 beneficiaries, 14 banks are non-domestic!
Payments were made as follows:
- $22.4 billion to satisfy CDS collateral postings by AIG Financial Products;
- $27.1 billion in payments made from Maiden Lane III To AIG FP counterparties;
- $43.7 billion in direct support to AIG securities lending counterparties;
U.S. Taxpayers will be thrilled to discover that of the $93.2 billion of their money spent to prevent financial collapse, over 70% went to bail out non-domestic banks.
Another $12.1 billion was spent to bailout out municipalities under Guaranteed Investment Agreements, the main beneficiaries being California and Virginia, both receiving just north of $1 billion.
In total, over $105 billion has been spent so far to bail out assorted entities that have been so far entangled in the AIG web.
Considering AIG's newfound understanding of the importance of upholding transparency regarding the use of public funds, the U.S. public now fully expects to see a list of all bonus recipients since the company's collapse on September 16, 2008.
Disclosure: No position
Related Articles
|






















Uncle Ben and Uncle Tim, I am a poor poverty stricken speculator who owes more than 50% more on the 3 houses I bought on no money down loans.
I also owe $$$ on my credit cards, have an upside down car loan/
Beside that, I have a student loan for a PhD degree from MIT in economics with no hope of getting a job in this climate.
My counterparties include the US Government, Freddie Mae and Fannie Mae, Bank of America and Citibank, among others.
You can't allow me to go under!
It would cause the counterparties to be insolvent, and also have the spectacle of a newly minted PhD in economics from MIT to be visibly out of a job and unemployed.
Bail me out, now. Or else.
Uncle Ben and Uncle Tim, I am a poor poverty stricken speculator who owes more than 50% more on the 3 houses I bought on no money down loans.
I also owe $$$ on my credit cards, have an upside down car loan/
Beside that, I have a student loan for a PhD degree from MIT in economics with no hope of getting a job in this climate.
My counterparties include the US Government, Freddie Mae and Fannie Mae, Bank of America and Citibank, among others.
You can't allow me to go under!
It would cause the counterparties to be insolvent, and also have the spectacle of a newly minted PhD in economics from MIT to be visibly out of a job and unemployed.
Bail me out, now. Or else.
Firstly, employment contracts are voided by bankruptcy. Although AIG, ML, C, BAC, and other WS rescued institutions are not technically bankrupt, the only reason they did not file for bankruptcy is government stepping in to prop them with taxpayers' money. Claiming that they should be allowed to pay bonuses because their bankruptcy has been avoided (or delayed) by massive use of public funds is disengenious, to say the least.
Secondly, congress just passed a law that allows judges to modify legally binding contracts (aka mortgages). So, it should be possible to pass a similar law allowing judges to retroactively modify, or even recoup, egregious bonuses paid by entities which had to be bailed out by government intervention.
- How is this a bailout? AIG was contractually committed to pay these sums. The fact that it was paid with public money is deplorable, but that's what the US government guaranteed when it took over the firm.
The American taxpayer should be furious.
call your MLA, Governor whoever will listen and scream
until the message gets through.
this is nothing short of ridiculous.
Somebody please shut these people down now!!!!!!
- they had significant CDS exposure if AIG failed
- GS had numerous holdings that were offset by "insuring" swaps with AIG as the counterparty. Hence the receipt of the collateral postings
- GS clearly had both "bet" and guarantee holdings, which account for the large amount paid out directly to GS from AIG.
So Government Sachs ensured that Goldman Sachs was paid with OUR MONEY!! Shameless, and a clear breach of fiduciary duty, if not actually criminal.
The only downside hitch would be if AIG and other counterparties went belly up before paying them out. We can see how they resolve that.
It seems AIG is finally disclosing to pressure their counterparties to pull their political strings so they won't go under. It's the "well if the government is about to let me fry then you better do something or I'll drag other bankers down with me.". This tactic works well holding the economy hostage for bailout money so why wouldn't it work on the bankers who are doing this tactic as well?
After all, the easy solution is just keep using others people's money. Sure the public will howl but it's obvious they don't give a rats ass about the public or taxpayer.
I am in agreement with prudent investor. A judge should be able to invalidate these ridiculous bonus contracts. As a former CEO familiar with bonus structuring, I find it unbelievable that there weren't clauses in the contracts that invalidated or at least reduced the payments in the event of severe financial distress.
$100 million bucks for the division that blew the company up? Yes, we really don't want to lose any of those talented players.
I want to see people in orange jump suits. Bring on the perp walks.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine