Worrisome Divergence in Gold, Miners ETF Charts 8 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The placement of the 200 MA in both of these charts is somewhat puzzling. Given the strength of gold since the November lows, one would think that the miners would be displaying equal strength. However this is not the case.
GLD, which is roughly 1/10 the price of gold, has had a series of higher highs and lower lows and is trading above its 200 MA. This is a bullish scenario, whereas GDX has failed to remain above its 200 MA and is looking like it wants to roll over. When you take a look at the volume patterns of GDX you’ll notice considerable selling pressure in the past few weeks and when it did manage a green day the volume was in most cases under its 60 EMA.
While I’m not ready to throw cold water on the rally in gold itself, I remain a skeptic as to whether mining stocks are going to benefit from the precious metal’s rise. Right now the pressure is on the bulls to close convincingly above its 200 MA in the gold miners ETF, or I would be looking to short the sector in the upcoming days.
Related Articles
|






















1. A substantial portion of their earnings depends on sales of base metals like copper, whose prices have tanked.
2. Many of the miners may have hedged (sold forward) much of their gold production for 2009 at below-market prices, insulating them in the near-term from gold's price rise.
3. Several large-cap miners have had secondary stock offerings or added debt recently.
Leveraged junior miners with low debt have been doing well lately compared to the seniors. (The one I like and own, because of its leverage, is Seabridge Gold (SA).)
Suggests the so-called non-expiring 'embedded option' on the price of gold in gold stocks justifying a premium in share price should instead be discounted and has been.
Mine management manages to ensure that the rising price of what they sell never flows to and/or subtracts from the bottom line. Meanwhile, the dilutive share incentives awarded flow from the shareholder's pocket to the management's. Mine all mine.
They lost money at $250oz. They lose money at a $1000oz, resource depleted and a bazillion more shares later. That's why they call it a mine.
I wish I could give you a detailed, value investor oriented response, but I trade only on technical analysis, and the charts point to lower prices right now. But if you're time frame is longer than a few weeks, then it's up for you to decide how to handle this position.
best of luck
On Mar 16 04:14 PM The Hern wrote:
> Jeff, how come GDX was trading around 50 when oil was at an all-time
> high and the price of gold was similar to now, yet now that oil is
> almost 5x less and gold is roughly the same price, GDX is trading
> around 30? Isn't oil/gas a huge component of the costs of miners?
> Why wouldn't this be reflected in the price of GDX? I jumped into
> GDX at 20 but I still see no reason yet to sell...