AIG: Geithner's Outraged? He Should Be Embarrassed 25 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Washington and the nation are enraged that AIG is paying millions in bonuses to retain financial wizards that sold insurance on mortgage backed securities with few assets to back up their promises.
AIG is telling us that it must pay those bonuses, because they are required by employment contracts necessary to retain its financial engineers.
Treasury Secretary Geithner has expressed outrage. Instead, he should be embarrassed.
When the Bush White House agreed to bail out General Motors (GM) and Chrysler, it required those companies to renegotiate their labor contracts—that’s right contracts—and they are doing just that to keep their federal largess.
The Obama Treasury, headed by Tim Geithner, is forcing the terms of that deal on the United Autoworkers.
Why did Secretaries Paulson and Geithner not require the same at AIG? Remember Geithner was president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank and a key player when financial giants like Citigroup (C) and AIG were being bailed with the taxpayers’ cash. Those bailouts continue, with easy terms for the bankers and their contracts, on Geithner’s watch.
The threat was the same with AIG and GM. If either shut down, the economy would plummet into chaos and depression we were told.
So Mr. Geithner, instead of being outraged at AIG’s last revelations, perhaps you can explain to all of us why a UAW worker earning $29 dollars an hour must give back wages and benefits to keep their company alive, while the architects of the biggest financial disaster in history get to keep their gold plated contracts.
Mr. Geithner, we are waiting for your answer.
Related Articles
|





















If GM and the auto makers had to modify their contracts with the UAW not once, but twice ( not even counting all the reduction in pay in the 2007 contract) so far to get a LOAN, why does AIG get off with this? Oh I know, these "contractural obligations of bonuses" were in place BEFORE the money was given to them. What!??? And the UAW contracts weren't? It's just another blatant demonstration that what's good enough for the "indians" doesn't apply to the "cheifs".
I want those contracts reviewed and any that were written in the last 18 months declared null and void.
I want all of those employees severed and brought back the next day as contract bundled services at 60% of their current salaries with no benefits. If Delphi Automotive can do it to their salaried employees and it’s legal….so can AIG…and take my word for it – they’ll take the jobs because there aren’t any replacement jobs available. If they don’t…I’ll be happy to jump ship from Automotive to Financial…I’m sure my degree and skill-sets are transferable and I have plenty of co-workers that would be willing or are free to join me.
I suggest you all do the same and send your elected officials the same scathing messages! Its time to revolt against these pin heads that are our elected officials. We need to start a new, we the people need to remove all elected officials. We need to start out with a group that has term limits, and are common people in touch with reality!
Can I hear an amen!?
These charlatans have scores of underage minions who may open your strongly worded letter and then, time permitting, get a chuckle or two out of it before tossing it aside.
Members of Congress should not be paid to "serve". They should be forced to survive on the extremely lucrative hand outs they get from their true supporters and leave us, the taxpaying CHUMP, alone!
On Mar 16 11:14 AM Cobra 1 wrote:
> I have sent a scathing letter to the white house and the treasury
> secretary! I am beyond pissed!
>
> I suggest you all do the same and send your elected officials the
> same scathing messages! Its time to revolt against these pin heads
> that are our elected officials. We need to start a new, we the people
> need to remove all elected officials. We need to start out with a
> group that has term limits, and are common people in touch with reality!
>
>
> Can I hear an amen!?
On Mar 16 09:31 AM ecliptix543 wrote:
> Although I've felt for some time that the word 'outrage' should be
> banned from the media for overuse and misuse, this particular case
> with AIG does fit the definition quite well. We might just have a
> new Treasury Secretary before too long if this crap keeps up...
On Mar 16 12:13 PM anarchist wrote:
> skeptic44, try and remember that most of Obama's "financial team"
> are holdovers from the last Republican Administration and therein
> lies the problem-sos.
Tell me this...why do they even deserve ANY bonuses...they have allowed our economy to go to shambles and they think that deserve ANYTHING.
I agree 100% with "slowdown's" above post...
On Mar 16 11:11 AM slowdown wrote:
> Oh no….Let’s not stop with the Treasury Department….where the hell
> is Corker, Shelby and the rest of the Republicans that were more
> interested in where the Auto Execs stayed, ate and how there got
> to DC then they were about working with us to save our jobs and economy.
> They were the first ones to call our Execs “bumbling idiots” and
> immediately targeted the labor contracts as being out of touch with
> the market. They demanded viability plans that included re-opening
> the contracts and forcing workers to take reductions, bondholders
> to take less and the UAW to take company stock instead of cash to
> fund their pension plan. Yeah…..I’m not buying this contract thing
> at all and I’m more than angry, frustrated and furious.
>
> I want those contracts reviewed and any that were written in the
> last 18 months declared null and void.
> I want all of those employees severed and brought back the next day
> as contract bundled services at 60% of their current salaries with
> no benefits. If Delphi Automotive can do it to their salaried employees
> and it’s legal….so can AIG…and take my word for it – they’ll take
> the jobs because there aren’t any replacement jobs available. If
> they don’t…I’ll be happy to jump ship from Automotive to Financial…I’m
> sure my degree and skill-sets are transferable and I have plenty
> of co-workers that would be willing or are free to join me.
On Mar 16 12:51 PM Cobra 1 wrote:
> Can you name 2?
on a national basis, financial shenanigans are our most important product. not much stuff is manufactured here anymore. stuff is manufactured in asia or in mexico.
> jack
You only have to go to the above web site to see why the financial services industries gets preferential treatment. They are the third highest industry (behind retired people and lawyers) in terms of giving to members of congress coughing up almost $63 million, 64% of that to Democrats.
We'll see what substantive action comes from this 'outrage'. I doubt very much. Detroit's biggest mistake is thinking they can get a fair shake without the big bribe.
Term limits are the only answer.
Hmmmm
I see that Shelby has a quote out there, not attacking AIG, but the Obama administration. C'mon Senator, you'll have to do better than that!
On Mar 16 11:11 AM slowdown wrote:
> Oh no….Let’s not stop with the Treasury Department….where the hell
> is Corker, Shelby and the rest of the Republicans that were more
> interested in where the Auto Execs stayed, ate and how there got
> to DC then they were about working with us to save our jobs and economy.
> They were the first ones to call our Execs “bumbling idiots” and
> immediately targeted the labor contracts as being out of touch with
> the market. They demanded viability plans that included re-opening
> the contracts and forcing workers to take reductions, bondholders
> to take less and the UAW to take company stock instead of cash to
> fund their pension plan. Yeah…..I’m not buying this contract thing
> at all and I’m more than angry, frustrated and furious.
>
> I want those contracts reviewed and any that were written in the
> last 18 months declared null and void.
> I want all of those employees severed and brought back the next day
> as contract bundled services at 60% of their current salaries with
> no benefits. If Delphi Automotive can do it to their salaried employees
> and it’s legal….so can AIG…and take my word for it – they’ll take
> the jobs because there aren’t any replacement jobs available. If
> they don’t…I’ll be happy to jump ship from Automotive to Financial…I’m
> sure my degree and skill-sets are transferable and I have plenty
> of co-workers that would be willing or are free to join me.