Two More Reasons I Think Housing Has Hit Bottom 17 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Last month I floated the idea that the housing market had hit its bottom. The two things I saw were: a December increase in housing prices as measured by the OFHEO, and a January decrease in the PPI for residential construction that was a lot less than it had been in prior months.
I noted that, lacking any additional data, these could be "aberrations."
Today I see two more data releases that add to the likelihood of this possibility: the PPI for residential construction fell even less in February, and housing starts increased in February for the first time since June 2008. The increase was across-the-board: seasonally adjusted and unadjusted, both single family and multi-family homes, and all regions except the West.
More boldly I said in December that I "expect to see housing construction resume next summer, if not earlier." I am sticking to that prediction.
The chart below shows why I think the construction PPI has been evolving differently so far in 2009.
click to enlarge
Related Articles
|























However, I do not agree with your position and feel it will be 18 mos. or more b-4 any real bottom is reached. But we do need your opinions as we need someone to take the hit as prices continue to fall. In full disclosure, I am a Realtor, and investor.
But if your in many other parts of the country (the less over built areas), bottom has probably been hit and we may start to see some recovery this summer. How one side offsets the other, and which will prevail (going lower or going higher on a national basis) is probably anyone's guess at this time.
the Fed announced today it will be helping with lower rates long enough to see us through...
On Mar 18 10:46 AM MGA_1 wrote:
> Well.. housing still hasn't hit the historical mean. Additionally,
> the Alt-A and Option Arm resets are going to be coming due later
> this year which will only add more houses to the outstanding inventories.
> I guess with interest rates extremely low one shouldn't be surprised
> that people are building houses again, but I can't see this lasting
> long term.
Over the last 10 years "Housing" morphed into a hot-potato system of rotating into ever-larger, ever-newer houses, while passing the older, smaller one onto someone else. And all of it was financed by Wall St. securitizations of crappy credit loans. Any honest reading of the true financial snapshot of recent borrowers would tell you that more than 50% of the mortgage loans made in 2005, 2006 and 2007 were made on the basis of radically over-inflated incomes and over-inflated property values. And now the music has stoppped. What does that mean? It means that there no longer is an "updraft" to feed a fire of rising property values. And without rising values, unless some people actually NEED a new house, they won't move. I takes a minimum of 5-10 years of people not moving, before enough back-pressure builds to make to people want to move en-masse again. This means that prices won't begin to move up again much before 2014 or so. Bottom, schmottom. Home prices are going to stay on the canvas for at least 3-5 years from now. If you think otherwise, you are mistaken.
The chart doesn't know jack.
There's still too much inventory to sell - Orlando and Phoenix are two examples. Affordability is through the roof, probably record highs in some areas. But, if you are concerned about losing a job or finding one, you are not looking for a house to buy. Affordability doesn't mean much given current economic conditions.
If it is a bottom, then it's going to be a long, long, long, flat bottom.