Potash Continues to Shake off Bad News 8 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
As we wrote in Tuesday's piece, it is interesting to see the fertilizer stocks "relatively" shake off some quite bad news of late [Mar 4, 2009: Potash, Mosaic, Intrepid Potash Come Under Pressure After Talk of Uralkai 25% Price Cut]. There is a lot of Mergers & Acquisitions activity in the space [Feb 5, 2009: Agrium Launches 3.6 Billion Bid for CF Industries] [Jan 16, 2009: Congratulations Terra Industries Holders], so that might be helping create a floor under the group and quite frankly, even if earnings estimates drop significantly further into 2009, this is not a particularly expensive sector.
That said, we have another cut in production out of Potash (POT), and I continue to smirk a bit as most of the companies I follow closely continue to use the same language regarding "it's a short term issue and the next quarter everything will be fine." It's been about 2 quarters of this so far - we'll see if they change their tune. With that said, agriculture is my favorite "long term" sector and this is the easiest way to play that very long term thesis.
This does highlight another theme: when stocks (or markets) want to go up, there is rather little news flow can do (aside from completely out of left field news events) that will dissuade it. In a move upward,you want to see bad news ignored, as all things being equal, that is bullish.
Via Reuters
- Potash Corp of Saskatchewan (POT), the world's largest fertilizer producer, plans to further curtail potash production after recent industry data showed that North American potash inventories have risen. The output cuts reflect a continuing near-term drawdown of inventories as customers work through stockpiles built up before the global economic crisis hit, Potash Corp said in a statement posted to its website on Monday.
- The company said it plans to reduce 2009 potash production by an additional 1.5 million tonnes, bringing the total expected curtailments of operational capacity this year to at least 3.5 million tonnes.
- Potash Corp said it still expects a strong rebound in potash demand in the second half of 2009 that should continue into 2010. (of course)
- The latest data from the Fertilizer Institute indicates that potash inventories at North American producers are 42 percent higher than the previous five-year average. (not good) North American potash shipments in both domestic and export markets were nearly nonexistent in February, down 80 percent from the year-earlier level to another record low of 200,000 tonnes, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch analyst Steve Byrne said in a note to clients. (scary bad)
- In a separate research note, BMO Capital Markets analyst Edwin Chee lowered his 2009 and 2010 earnings estimates for Potash Corp and also cut his share-price target for the company.
Related Articles
|























When IPI released its earnings, it noted that the price was up 200% from the previous year or around the reduced price quoted for Uralkai.
I just had to make this post. I did not want your 1,000th Article to go by unnoticed.
Quite frankly, this is going completely to plan and individuals/ insiders who actually do know a thing or two about potash have seen this coming from a mile away and are also able to read between the lines as it relates to what is outlined in the Fertilizer Publications FMB, Fertecon et al (not paying attention to commercial banking analysts, who have absolutely no clue).
That said, this will absolutely drag on longer than most think and secondly, PCS' 1st quarter results are going to be horrific. Will be shorting the hole gleefully at the right time prior to their April 21/ 09 results
I continue to think MOS and POT management are going to concede on the 1Q earnings call that they've been too optimistic about the rebound. The question is, are investors already pricing in a disappointing 2Q and full year 2009 and they're willing to own the stock at current levels in anticipation of a strong 2010 and beyond.
I obviously don't know the answer. I'm hoping for a flush after 1Q earnings are announced so I can buy the stock much cheaper, but the fact the stock is so reslient in the face of bad news makes me think I may not get that opportunity.
But he did not mention IPI at all. When it was in IPO stage he wanted to buy it at $30 last year as it continued up above $70.
This year, not a word. Thank you Mr. Cramer. Why do I thank MR. J.C.?
He loved MMR in the upper teens a few years ago but when it dropped some 30%, there was a deafening silence. MMR went on to triple that low.
I ignored his Pitch but bought on the drop because Moffett was buying and Day was buying. When Cramer said take some profits, I sold 3/4ths, it went up another 20%.
Now its down around 85% from its peak, but Moffett is buying...
On Mar 21 11:03 AM Conan the Barbarian wrote:
> Cramer was rather upbeat about fertilizers in general recently, esp.
> TNH.
>
> But he did not mention IPI at all. When it was in IPO stage he wanted
> to buy it at $30 last year as it continued up above $70.
>
> This year, not a word. Thank you Mr. Cramer. Why do I thank MR. J.C.?
>
>
> He loved MMR in the upper teens a few years ago but when it dropped
> some 30%, there was a deafening silence. MMR went on to triple that
> low.
>
> I ignored his Pitch but bought on the drop because Moffett was buying
> and Day was buying. When Cramer said take some profits, I sold 3/4ths,
> it went up another 20%.
>
> Now its down around 85% from its peak, but Moffett is buying...<br/>
>