Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Bretton Woods II is collapsing. Amid increasing skepticism from China regarding the security of its holdings of U.S. Treasuries, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s FOMC announced on Wednesday that it would purchase $300 billion worth of U.S. Treasuries in the next six months – effectively monetizing its debt and firing up its printing presses. This announcement caused the U.S. Dollar (USD) to fall precipitously against the Euro, in addition to causing the price of Gold in USD terms to jump – demonstrating the market’s belief that the U.S. was well on its way to deflating its debt and debasing its currency.

Conventional wisdom holds that the Federal Reserve did this without much regard for its impact on the value of China’s holdings. However, given the buildup in negative statements by China’s leadership about the stability of U.S. Treasuries, a unilateral move by the Federal Reserve would be the diplomatic equivalent of giving China the middle finger. The U.S. is in no position to do that. If the Chinese government were to fear that the value of its holdings is going to decline, it would be obliged to sell them off and salvage whatever value it can before the market for U.S. Treasuries crashes. With more than $700 billion in U.S. Treasuries, China is the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries, ahead of Japan, UK and the GCC countries.

That such a sell-off has not yet occurred indicates that the move by the Federal Reserve to monetize its own debt was carefully discussed with the Chinese government. Since the statement by the FOMC neglected to specify whether the purchase would be of fresh Treasuries, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the Federal Reserve intends to purchase Treasuries that have already been issued. And in that case there is the possibility that the Federal Reserve has promised to purchase a part of China’s holdings of U.S. Treasuries in return for assurances that China would not precipitate a premature destruction of the USD. This would not have as great and direct an inflationary impact as the Federal Reserve purchasing fresh U.S. Treasuries issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. However it does point to a highly disturbing and very likely possibility that the U.S. is about to severely debauch its own currency.

China has been the largest holder of U.S. Treasuries since September 2008 when its holdings ($618 bn) surpassed Japan’s ($617 bn). Since then China has grown its holdings to $739.6 bn (January 2009), up more than 50% since January 2008. The monthly growth rate in China’s holdings has, however, declined from its peak of 10.66% in November 2008 to just 1.68% in January 2009. The corresponding monthly growth rate for Japan’s holdings peaked in July 2008 at 8.2% and has since declined to 1.41% in January 2009. This has been accompanied by a steep decline in exports for both nations in the final quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. Simply put, these nations are no longer as flush with dollars (thanks to Himalayan exports) as they used to be. With their own economies in tailspin, both governments are more concerned at this moment with stimulating domestic demand for their own goods.

In this context, if the U.S. Federal Reserve is indeed going to purchase Treasuries that are currently held by China, it effectively implies that China will not be purchasing Treasuries in any significant numbers in the future. By some accounts the U.S. government is set to issue upwards of $2.5 trillion in fresh treasuries in 2009 in order to fund the various spending programs it has announced, an astounding 81% increase when compared to the total U.S. Treasuries held by foreign entities. Since 2002, more than 80% of the fresh treasuries issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury have been purchased by foreign entities. Hence the slowdown in purchasing them by China and Japan (who collectively purchased more than 44% of the Treasuries issued since January 2008) is cause for serious concern.

It is fairly obvious that China and Japan, the two countries whose purchase of Treasuries has provided the most support for the USD, will be unable to continue at their historically high rates of Treasury uptake. This, coupled with the incredible increase in U.S. spending, should be enough to cause the USD to plunge like a rock. As if this isn’t enough, the possibility of the Federal Reserve purchasing U.S. Treasuries held by China, if true, means that Bretton Woods II is well and truly dead and the USD is heading that way faster than was first thought.

Stock position: None.

Print this article with comments

This article has 28 comments:

  •  
    Buy silver,gold,and pbr oil
    Mar 22 10:53 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Shaunak, very nice work here... I wanted to ask you though in more detail why you believe the US is giving the proverbial middle finger to China if the purchase of the debt increases the value of the debt they own? I agree with you that the dollar will fall hard given that the action of buying our own debt expresses concern for our nation...
    Mar 22 11:15 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The US needs a week dollar and high inflation to resolve the debt crisis. China also needs a week Yuan to make its exports more competitive. And every nation on earth also wants to devalue.

    The game plan is for these competitive pressures to allow the world to monetize its debt collectively, while maintaining the delicate trading relationships necessary to shore up employment.

    This plan will unilaterally hurt creditors (e.g. China, wealthy folks) and help debtors (e.g. US Govt, consumers, home owners, etc.) So why will our creditors allow this to happen? Because they ultimately have an interest in preserving stability along with everyone else. It's not good enough that they have money -- they need to keep making money to survive.

    And keep in mind, the folks with the money (creditors) are smart. They get it. Ultimately our creditors will act in their own best interests, which is not the death of the dollar.

    Everything else is just a political show -- noise and posturing.

    Mar 22 11:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To reiterate my point -- you can't look at this problem in a vacuum. If the rest of the world decides to keep their currency strong, then yes, the dollar is dead. But they have no interest in keeping their currencies strong.

    Like chess, this a game that requires you to look several moves ahead.


    On Mar 22 11:15 AM David Sawyer wrote:

    > I agree with you that the dollar will fall hard given
    > that the action of buying our own debt expresses concern for our
    > nation...
    Mar 22 11:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    People in the financial services industry may not like to hear this, but the average retirement savings contributor will give up on stocks...and...buy Treasuries, making up for many previous Treasury buyers. I know that sounds insane, and that just kills the stock market further, and the money management "teams" that direct retirement funds, but when you get your mind around it, many of the previous assumptions one makes are no longer valid. The S&P P/E will go to 8. We do find a bottom in the 300-400 range. The dollar does remain the reserve currency, and strong. America leads the World out of the mild depression in store for us. China goes into a Japan-like decade of declines. Oil demand plummets and oil returns to $35. Real Estate values never recover their former highs, and banks find that the CRE "shoe", now falling, is just difficult to handle. Banks in Western Europe collapse, causing the dollar to magically rise up once again, as gold, silver and the dollar are the preferred capital preservation tools in a stagflated World. Capitalism is finally allowed to work, as the government cannot push their agenda any further, and it's painful for almost every entity that is either leveraged or whose model requires them to be leveraged in order to succeed.
    Mar 22 11:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Texaser: exceptional, level-headed comments to Mr Agarkhedkar's interesting article. It's always good to hear reasoned and thoughtful points. Especially pertainent is your reminder to ignore the noise.

    Calling the USD 'dead' sounds both permanent and alarmist ... but maybe it takes eye-cateching headlines to entice readers to open up a link.

    Conventional wisdom holds that the Federal Reserve did this without much regard "for its impact on the value of China’s holdings." No, that would be a knee-jerk assumption, wouldn't it? 'Wisdom' would reason, as the author did, that "the move by the Federal Reserve to monetize its own debt was carefully discussed with the Chinese government."

    The USD will very likely devalue, but as texaser correctly points out, " ... every nation on earth also wants to devalue" to support their trade exports. There's some relative value to be considered, as well as the underlying creditworthiness of the US.

    And again texaser wisely says, "this a game that requires you to look several moves ahead." Amen. Let's not try to call the game over in the opening minutes.

    In the race to the currency bottom, the US will ultimately preserve the USD's desirability by coordinating monetary moves, and by assuring creditors of its ability to weather the coming financial turmoil over months and years, rather than days or weeks.

    During that longer period nations that can contain the resulting inflationary spirals will do well.
    Mar 22 12:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The dollar is toast! Way to go Ben! If pouring gasoline on the fire doesn’t work, try nitroglycerine! Some $1.2 trillion in new agency and bond purchases, including previously untoucheable long term treasury bonds. Goodbye dollar, hello 4% home mortgage rates. Just tack on another 3% to the 2010 inflation rate. The bond market had its biggest up day in history, gold soared $50, the euro gapped up 4%, and commodity prices roared. Citigroup (C) has quadrupled from $1 to $4 since last week, while General Electric (GE) has doubled from $5 to $10! Just when you think this guy has thrown in the kitchen sink, he shows up another truckload of kitchen sinks. I guess this is what a 1590 SAT score gets you.
    Mar 22 02:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    no asset is safe. One would say that real assets and commodities are safe. Guess what many real assets like land buildings have high taxation. Commodities will be manipulated. In the end, the common person can just save and hope for the best, but will not be able to beat the system.
    Mar 22 02:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Beggar thy neighbor eh Ben? It's a mad dash to the bottom.
    Mar 22 04:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    @texaser - couldnt have said it any better myself. for China to sell off mass holdings of us treasury and to destroy the dollar would be the equivalent of declaring war. we all know thats not gonna happen. everyone has a vested interested in keeping the game going. periodic strengths and weakness of the dollar is nothing new, so we get an inflationary period, big deal, it is actually in our interest to reflate some...
    Mar 22 04:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Excellent article - I suspected that back room with China precluded this announcement, but I had not made the connection between the FED beginning to buy Treasuries and the China stopping their own purchases. Thanks for making it for me.
    Mar 22 06:13 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Argh. I mean to say "I suspected that a back room deal with China..."
    Mar 22 06:20 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Another currency for America?

    An alternative to another world reserve currency, or in addition, would be to introduce a competitive currency for our debased D.C. dollar.
    Is the Fed just debasing the currency? Is it time for dual currencies here in America? Perhaps a Fed Reserve West in the heartland, with a N.A. dollar (North American dollar), with tight bank management controls, good IT team, and transparency and accountability, especially when temptation (creating money) is at the door or window. Start the 2 currencies at par. Then let all Americans decide what currency they prefer in transactions, both personal and for business accounting. A more limited supply increases the value of any commodity, including a currency; hence protecting the value of a currency. There is too much money out there idling already; more geenbacks by the Fed is not the solution; too much debt is the problem. Debt city or deleveraging city (D.C.) what's the call - America?
    Mar 23 01:49 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    David, thank you for the comment.

    If the Fed were buying fresh Treasuries, that would be giving the finger to China because the actions (monetization of US Debt) would lead to a precipitous decline in the value of the dollar (and thus China's holdings).

    In doing that the US risks sparking a Treasury war of sorts with China. China might decide to offload its holdings of Treasuries ASAP in order to harvest / salvage whatever value it can as the dollar heads to bottom.

    I think that's too great a risk for the US Fed and Dept of Treasury to want to deal with right now. They've most certainly coordinated this with the Chinese and have worked out a deal.


    On Mar 22 11:15 AM David Sawyer wrote:

    > Shaunak, very nice work here... I wanted to ask you though in more
    > detail why you believe the US is giving the proverbial middle finger
    > to China if the purchase of the debt increases the value of the debt
    > they own? I agree with you that the dollar will fall hard given
    > that the action of buying our own debt expresses concern for our
    > nation...
    Mar 23 01:49 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Europe has dual currencies; why not America? Let the currencies compete to see which one is perceived to be best managed and most valuable. Like any commodity, a more limited supply (i.e. monetary conservative) fosters enhanced value. In other words, let the market place decide. Of course, the portraits would be the same; and at the top of N.A. dollar, one would have Federal Reserve West note.
    Mar 23 01:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    TexasER, interesting comment.

    It seems to me that China is now more focused on trying to stimulate domestic demand and cornering resources around the world.

    Furthermore, given the amount of fresh debt the US intends to issue this year ($2.5 trillion), it is very doubtful if there are enough nations out there with the trade surpluses to buy them up.

    We would all like to see what you have mentioned. But that would take tremendous cooperation and a coinciding of interest all around the world. And even then the USD would surely devalue given the amount of spending planned.

    Maybe there'll be a collective outbreak of groupthink and the international system will be saved to crash another day. I don't see it happening.

    Cheers!


    On Mar 22 11:38 AM @TexasER wrote:

    > The US needs a week dollar and high inflation to resolve the debt
    > crisis. China also needs a week Yuan to make its exports more competitive.
    > And every nation on earth also wants to devalue.
    >
    > The game plan is for these competitive pressures to allow the world
    > to monetize its debt collectively, while maintaining the delicate
    > trading relationships necessary to shore up employment.
    >
    > This plan will unilaterally hurt creditors (e.g. China, wealthy
    > folks) and help debtors (e.g. US Govt, consumers, home owners, etc.)
    > So why will our creditors allow this to happen? Because they ultimately
    > have an interest in preserving stability along with everyone else.
    > It's not good enough that they have money -- they need to keep making
    > money to survive.
    >
    > And keep in mind, the folks with the money (creditors) are smart.
    > They get it. Ultimately our creditors will act in their own best
    > interests, which is not the death of the dollar.
    >
    > Everything else is just a political show -- noise and posturing.
    >
    >
    Mar 23 02:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Waf76, for the US to monetize its debt and severely reduce the value of China's holdings would also be the equivalent of declaring war. Think about it.

    Cheers!

    On Mar 22 04:49 PM waf76 wrote:

    > @texaser - couldnt have said it any better myself. for China to
    > sell off mass holdings of us treasury and to destroy the dollar would
    > be the equivalent of declaring war.
    Mar 23 02:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    China has moved to only buying short term treasuries. There is no demand for the longer term securities so the FED announced it will buy them starting this week (this means that the FED has been buying them for some time). The exit from the dollar is in it's early statges. The dollar may surge agian if there are large stock market sell offs but the deal is done. The dollar is a dead man walking.
    Mar 23 03:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    3/23/2009

    "US Treasury bonds will remain central to China's plans for investing its massive foreign exchange holdings, a deputy governor of the Chinese central bank said Monday.

    "Investing in US Treasury bonds is an important element in China's investment strategy and we will continue this practice," Hu Xiaolian told reporters."

    Chinese media reported last week that the forex reserves had fallen by about 30 billion dollars in January, partially due to a drop in the value of non-dollar assets."

    Mar 23 08:10 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with this analysis in general but a few things remain cloudy.

    The huge (for Americans) savings rate of the moment means there's an extra $550B on the sidelines every month. That money could indeed stay in the States, buying up whatever Messrs. Obama and Geithner proffer.

    On the other hand, not all nations are kindly disposed to us and someone, somewhere is bound to see this as their "moment." No matter what else happens, we could make up one day and hear that people want to be paid for oil in khaleejis, euros or something else. For Americans, that would send commodity prices skyrocketing in the short to medium term. Longer term that could sort itself out as it will force the uncapping of wells here which are currently not feasible to operate. We'd also find out if the conspiracy theorists are right about huge reserves in Alaska and the Dakotas.
    Mar 23 10:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If China doesn't buy, then how in the heck to they expect to export? The RMB/Yuan is highly undervalued. If market forces were allowed to reign, China would be an importing nation. There is more at stake for China: it's own production.

    The dollar will take a hit for a while until the next round of bad news out of the EU. Sit back, relax...and let it happen.
    Mar 23 11:21 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I have to agree with TexER. Let the currency wars begin. What? They already have?

    China has a 2 decade head start? They'll need to buy more bonds. Eitehr that or buy American dairy exports, cat food, untainted milk, Christmas ornaments, fishing poles, and cheap jeans. Naaa...it'll be bonds.

    The G20 declared in principle not to engage in protectionism. While not technically protectionism, debasing one's currency certainly reeks of it.

    Caught a glimpse of a report in Bloomberg China intends to keep buying US bonds. (Still need to confirm that...but I suspect it's right.) Look, when all this is said and done, those bonds will hold more value in the long term.

    The dollar is not dead, it's just out in front...like a reserve currency and an administration bent on taming this crisis (rightly or wrongly) should be. The euro will follow in a few months, most likely.

    The thing that is hurting the dollar in the past week and today is fear and risk appetite, respectively...
    Mar 23 11:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Speaking of back room "pressure" deals, it's the same thing that kept oil priced in dollars...back room deals. Remember that argument? There was talk OPEC, urged on by Venezuela and Iran, would price dollars in euros. If the dollar was truly gonna tank, those deals would be dead in the water, first. China, OPEC...all understand the value of the dollar will fluctuate.
    Mar 23 11:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    China has been executing a deliberate strategy of late buying equity stakes in global commodity companies and making cash loans in the $25 billion range to Brazil and Russia in exchange for oil. It looks to me like they are being a lot more activist with their money than they used to be. Further, they are ramping-up gold production at a remarkable pace becoming the second largest gold producer last year. All this and a recognition that they have to stimulate domestic demand leads me to wonder if they see a future coming where they are far less dependent on US consumption. Given what we are doing to our own fiscal posture they have got to wonder if we will not be a much diminished nation i the years ahead. Certainly enough writers ad commentators on SA see that as a possibility, it would be surprising if China didn't as well.
    Mar 23 11:57 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To all those insisting that China must continue to buy Treasuries I ask one question.

    What are they going to buy Treasuries with if their trade surplus is wiped out thanks to a precipitous drop in exports (4Q08)?

    A fall in imports has kept the trade surplus in the black, but given its position as an assembler more than a manufacturer (value added in China is less than 30% of the total value of the product), a fall in imports is bound to lead a fall in exports.

    What then? China cannot print USDs ... only Ben can.
    Mar 23 12:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "The Dollar is Dead" Against other fiat currencies - no. Against precious metals and commodities - yes. Against equities - who knows?
    Mar 23 03:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If the crude is still backed up in Okla. tanks then the rapid rise in crude price is BS.
    Mar 23 05:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Shaunak, great question and arguably a dilemma for China. As you said earlier, they are focusing on domestic demand, something they can control, at the expense of export demand, which they can't control.

    And I do not know the answer to your question. The bottom line is, this crisis is one giant, nasty sandwich we are all taking a bite from, China included.

    It might be best if China just held treasuries in hopes of future relative strength against other instruments (despite the arguments for a burst treasury bubble which may or may not happen.) And maybe ease their purchases a bit and took it on the chin like the rest of us. But, even as yields fall, the US treasuries may still be the best thing going as other nations enter QE.

    Good, interesting question.
    Mar 24 11:52 PM | Link | Reply