I'm Skeptical About This Rally 26 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
How quickly things change…..
Some stats from today’s rally:
S&P: +54 (7.1%) to 823
Dow: +497 (+6.8%) to 7776
NYSE Up Volume: 1,866,836,012
NYSE Down Volume: 44,683,760
NYSE Total Volume: 1,914,836,622
It was just 2 weeks ago (March 9th) that the S&P closed at 12-year lows and the stock market felt like it was forecasting the end of the world. We’ve now rallied 22% in 2 weeks!
But if we look at the catalysts for this rally, they really don’t seem to justify such an explosive move. Citi said they were profitable in the first two months of the year and JP Morgan (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC) said they were too. The Fed initiated some serious quantitative easing. And now Geithner’s toxic asset plan this morning.
I agree with the Capital Spectator when he wrote this morning:
We’re skeptical largely because the rally this month has drawn power primarily from a new round of hope that Washington’s various experiments to right the economy will finally hit pay dirt. Perhaps, but it’s not the stuff that powers sustainable rallies, much less secular bull markets.
I’m a seller of this rally at this point…..
Related Articles
|






















Prediction, follow through bullish in the AM Tuesday, then a look down from the overbought heights around noon, with an afternoon fade into the close with profit taking. Happy trading
Once the shorts are cleared out the volume may decrease and the momentum players may decide to take profits. Remember, short covering, technical traders and quantitative models are not buy and hold, in for the long-term investors. They flee as quickly as they appear. If this is a real turn off the bottom we will see continued high volume with the "real" bargain hunter investors providing the follow though and taking the market back above the highs of the last rally. If we can't break to higher ground on a sustained rally, I'll be getting ready for another leg down.
I suspect we need encouraging numbers from Quater 1 results, and if the write offs from financials are not over, it will be hard to get a positive earnings number from the S&P 500. I am not wishing for things to awry, just recommending caution. After all, the reports from Citi, Wells Fargo, etc. did say that they were very profitable for the first two months of 2009, excluding non-recurring items. Don't forget those non-recurring items. The wording as used could just as easily mean that they lost money in the first two months of 2009 if the non-recurring items were included. I expect the later to be the case. And I also expect them to pre-announce on April 1st (you do know what day April 1st is, right?)
www.dogsofthedow.com/y...
This chart helps demonstrate that in general, the trend is up except for the end of the tax season (mid April - end of May) when all those checks go to the IRS.
We are in March, It’s conceivable that SPX 650 will be at the bottom, but we’ll see that level at least one more time.
I find hard to believe that the current rally could have much steam left in it.
On Mar 23 06:54 PM youngman442002 wrote:
> I too am not buying into to it long term...its strictly a day trade.....so
> the Banks are AOK now..except Sheila Blair said some are not...BUT
> of course she would not say which ones..so much for the new transparency...its
> the bankers(seekingalpha.com/symbo...) making the American
> public feel like all is good....so they can get onto baseball or
> something while they fleece the rest of the TARP monies away....GS
> will be a big buy of these so called "Bad Assets"..and yes the government
> will cover 95% of them...so GS will squeeze out a 40% profit them
> dump them back to the US to cover....and down we go again....but
> hey its only Monday and only another trillion...probably 3 more by
> Friday....
I am long on the EURO. I don't think the EU has the stomach for the political consequences of high inflation; especially, since the Nazi's emerged out the hyper-inflation of the 20's.
We may not see good numbers for Q1, but from Q2 on we very well might see better numbers, for no reason other than the comparative numbers (2008) began to drop in Q2. Q3 and Q4 are probably going to look splendid for that reason alone.
So... if this rally isn't it, we're not far from it. I got my dip in good the past few weeks, so I'm good to go.
What goes up comes down, what goes down can go back up
Geez - how hard is that to figure out
I think we've had a good bounce, but I think we may retest the lows when we get a long string of bad Q1 earnings reports coming up. With a market this volatile, the bulls and the bears can both be right, so enjoy the ride. But everyone needs to keep their eyes open.
Have the fundamentals in the market changed? The only change I see is the QE flood. Does inflation lead to earnings growth? Or, does the risk of holding cash outweigh the risk of owning stocks at this point.
On Mar 23 10:17 PM William Cowie wrote:
> The S&P broke through the 50 day moving average. That's a start.
> but one break does not a summer make, so Husker Mark's comments stand.
>
>
> We may not see good numbers for Q1, but from Q2 on we very well might
> see better numbers, for no reason other than the comparative numbers
> (2008) began to drop in Q2. Q3 and Q4 are probably going to look
> splendid for that reason alone.
>
> So... if this rally isn't it, we're not far from it. I got my dip
> in good the past few weeks, so I'm good to go.
I agree that the government is trying to partially reinflate the credit bubble, the key word being partially. Having swung from too much credit (no credit score, nothing down, how about a condo in Manhattan?) to too little (700+ credit score, <20% down, no house for you! and no car loan either!) a partial rebuilding of the credit market is exactly what we need.
Like it or not our economy depends on credit availability. It would be nice if that dependance was lessened, but that will take time. I doubt that the average american will remember any of this in 10 years unless reminded, but I strongly hope that the average underwriter or risk assesment professional will.
www.google.com/finance...
On Mar 23 10:26 PM Rocket Scientist wrote:
> ALL of you are full of it
>
> What goes up comes down, what goes down can go back up
>
> Geez - how hard is that to figure out
>
Then the market crashed over the next couple of years and the Dow was down by about 89% from peak to troth.
I think history might be repeating itself...though I don't think the market will be down 90% overall. The 1929 bubble was much larger, and I think this will be the Great Stagflation, not the Great Depression. Market wil be down 75% in real terms...which may just end up being a 50-60% nominal drop.
www.imf.org/external/p...
if the dow breaches 8200 ....get ready for a real rallyyyy
125 63 49 521
Yeah, let's rally.
As you well know, the most money that can ever be made on the upside is during the classic bear market rally. That is what we have, no matter how it was caused and no matter how reasonable having a rally now may or may not be.
Ride it through until the media starts screaming, "Buy, buy!"
Then, run like Hell.