Cramer's Mad Money - Cramer Strikes Back (3/24/09) 6 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Stocks discussed on the in-depth session of Jim Cramer's Mad Money TV Program, Tuesday March 24.
Cramer Strikes Back: Fannie Mae (FNM), Freddie Mack (FRE)
Morgan Stanley (MS), Goldman Sachs (GS), JP Morgan (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Citigroup (C)
The only ones who love Procter & Gamble are consumers loyal to the company's brands, but that will soon change. Sales were down 5% the last quarter because of the strong dollar. Since the company has strong international exposure, the weakening dollar will most likely mean more overseas sales. While PG was forced to pass higher commodity and energy costs on to the consumer, lower raw costs will now benefit the company. Five out of the 10 best-selling brands in the U.S. were Procter & Gamble brands, and the company is not losing out to private label competition. While the 3.4% dividend is not huge, the fact that the company raised it is a sign of confidence. Cramer sees an eventual upside for Procter & Gamble, but until then, the dividend pays off while waiting.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Get Cramer's Picks by email-- it's free and takes only a few seconds to sign up.
Seeking Alpha is not affiliated with Jim Cramer, CNBC or TheStreet.com
Related Articles
|





















They missed the key criminal behavior by wall street colluding to set prices and manipulate the market leverage and assets.
It is impossible to mitigate risk across all asset classes.Someone must assume risk or there will be no returns. The alleged insurance and hedging only works if there are winners and losers but the model assumed everyone could keep winning.
AIG would have had to had assts of the entire mortgage market to cover losses but when you add 40 leverage on top then no entity except as we have seen (governemnts) could cover the losses. The insurance which the banks had to know was a ponzi scheme as long as no one asked for their money the money machine could keep cranking.
The real solution would have been to nationalize AIG and unwind all the trades for the bad actors. ie the banks and hedge funds the good actors the clients of banks and hedge funds would be made whole.
You then nationalize the bad actors if they are bankrupt and do the same again.
This would have flushed out the bad actors and sent quite a few people to jail. Like the ceo of Merril,Citi,Golman,Leh... Stearns and the list just goes on!!
Every day a "new soup pof the day"
Must be another guy called CRAMER, because Jim has no credability left, not that he ever had much!
The only thing we can gain from this is Cramer is now buying, so SELL SELL SELL!
"After his critics fired at him with clips of calls that missed the mark, Cramer has compiled his own sampling of statements he made warning viewers about impending "financial Armageddon." Cramer played a few clips proving that he spoke about potential bank failures and urged investors to prepare for the problems ahead. Cramer gives credit to his sources, who have been in the business for many years and saw the crisis coming. However, the same sources see an upturn coming soon and recommend buying stocks"