China's Dollar Crocodile Tears 9 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Sorry to have burst the naivete bubble early, but it didn't take China outwardly denouncing the U.S. currency as the world's reserve currency to figure out that China is concerned about their investment in U.S. Treasurys.
Tim Geithner was pouring gas on the fire with his unncecessary and obvious public statement about China manipulating their currency.
I really don't know why China is crying to the IMF about it when they could single-handedly shut down the U.S. currency as the reserve currency by ceasing to buy Treasurys or by selling them. China has such a massive investment that they are stuck in a paradox with their investment, the same as a creditor that has sunk a large investment into a dying business. The creditor knows the business is dying but doesn’t want to be the one to kill it. The U.S. is like a dying business that has creditors but also has a counterfeit money printer and prints out money when it doesn't have enough money to pay its debts. But if it prints too much it will become obvious to the creditor that the money isn't real.
I wonder when the public will stop focusing on smaller infractions like the AIG bonuses and take a closer look at China's ongoing rhetoric about our currency. The accepted lie about the U.S. currency is that a devalued dollar is a good thing. Let's take a look at what happened when we had $150 oil which was amazing for our economy. It helped to drive our economy right down to where it is now. It was also coupled with the bursting of the debt and housing bubbles that were the drivers of our shadow economy.
Everything that seems so obvious now was obvious then, too, but no one wanted to listen because of the other static like the war in Iraq. It was clear and indicators like average household salaries did not go up but yet their mortgage obligations and spending did. This is just like a cash flow statement. Where did the money come from? Debt - of course.
Related Articles
|






















The success of the euro shows that monetary union is the best way to ensure monetary stability. The primary problem with the euro and currencies of other monetary unions is that they still must co-exist within the international multi-currency system itself where the value of those common currencies must still fluctuate in value against each other.
If 16 countries can use the same currency, why not 192?
In addition to eliminating currency risk and currency fluctuations, the use of a Single Global Currency would eliminate the current foreign exchange trading expense of $400 billion annually, eliminate current account imbalances, eliminate the need for foreign exchange reserves (now totalling more than $3 trillion); and bring other benefits worth trillions.
The Single Global Currency Assn. (singleglobalcurrency.org)
promotes the implementation of a Single Global Currency by 2024, the 80th anniversary of the 1944 conference. That’s only 16 years away.
The world is moving toward a Single Global Currency through the
expansion and creation of regional monetary unions and then the merger of those monetary unions. Another route is through international monetary conferences proposals and agreements, such as were seen at Bretton Woods. The challenge now is to reach that goal planfully, as soon as possible with as little cost and as few crises as possible.
See the book, "The Single Global Currency - Common Cents for the World."
Morrison Bonpasse
Single Global Currency Assn.
Newcastle, Maine, United States
Of course, the biggest dream for China would be to issue something which is world currency. They would want seigniorage. But to want and to have are quite different things.
I don't say that weak dollar is good for US. Quite an opposite. But current "printing" money by Fed only keeps deflation at bay, inflation is still nowhere in sight.
This is nonsense. China can in theory dump all 1Trillion of their US dollar assets and it will not change the USD's status as a reserve currency. Global trades and investments are settled in US Dollars and major commodities are priced in US Dollars. None of these can be changed by any other country "single-handedly". It takes global concensus and coordinated efforts over an extended period of time to make any change to the current 'architecture'.
On Mar 25 11:15 AM Morrison Bonpasse wrote:
> China seeks what every user of any currency wants, which is monetary
> stability. The best way for the world to secure monetary stability
> is to move to a Single Global Currency, managed by a Global Central
> Bank within a Global Monetary Union.
> The success of the euro shows that monetary union is the best way
> to ensure monetary stability. The primary problem with the euro and
> currencies of other monetary unions is that they still must co-exist
> within the international multi-currency system itself where the value
> of those common currencies must still fluctuate in value against
> each other.
> If 16 countries can use the same currency, why not 192?
> In addition to eliminating currency risk and currency fluctuations,
> the use of a Single Global Currency would eliminate the current foreign
> exchange trading expense of $400 billion annually, eliminate current
> account imbalances, eliminate the need for foreign exchange reserves
> (now totalling more than $3 trillion); and bring other benefits worth
> trillions.
> The Single Global Currency Assn. (singleglobalcurrency.org)
>
> promotes the implementation of a Single Global Currency by 2024,
> the 80th anniversary of the 1944 conference. That’s only 16 years
> away.
> The world is moving toward a Single Global Currency through the<br/>expansion
> and creation of regional monetary unions and then the merger of those
> monetary unions. Another route is through international monetary
> conferences proposals and agreements, such as were seen at Bretton
> Woods. The challenge now is to reach that goal planfully, as soon
> as possible with as little cost and as few crises as possible.<br/>See
> the book, "The Single Global Currency - Common Cents for the World."
>
> Morrison Bonpasse
> Single Global Currency Assn.
> Newcastle, Maine, United States
>
There is no immediate threat to the USD being dropped as the world's reserve currency...especially in light of all too many central bankers seeking weaker currencies, while we are happy with a strong USD...and I'm sure the world is happy to hold strong USD in their reserves.
The idea of a single "Global Central Bank" is simply terrible. The EUR is squeezed enough by the fact that the ECB has to set policy for countries as different as Germany, Slovakia, and Spain...how would blanket policy be set for countries as different as the US, Sweden, and Zimbabwe???
Eventually the world will realize the US economy shrinking in comparison to the size of forex reserve (and thus USD) outstanding, the USD bubble will burst.
While China will also be taking a hit, they only held 50% of their forex reserve in USD denominated assets. The world average is 66%. So somewhere, someone is out their with their pants down, holding 70% or 90% of greenbacks.
Paul Volcker is another supporter of a Single Global Currency, along with Nobel Laureate Robert Mundell.
It's Common Cents.
Do you have any objection to the benefits that you kindly listed for the Single Global Currency?
See singleglobalcurrency.org