Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Inflation has been trickling back in, and the price of oil has rocketed recently. With crude closing just above $54/gallon, I foresee a repeat of what happened last summer, except this time I don’t think deflationary forces will cause crude to come down crashing and prevent the idiotic political forces from Washington into pushing us into a full-fledged energy crisis.

Congress has made it clear any company that makes exorbitant profits is at risk. Oil companies, in particular, are on close watch. Most of the talk last year about a windfall profits tax was once oil crept over $110/barrel and the price of gas was $3 or more at the pump.

With the Fed’s printing press going full blast and the continued decline in the dollar, no offshore drilling ban premanently removed, and other factors, we can expect oil to creep back up to $100 by the summer again. I think this will mainly be an inflationary event caused by the expanded money supply, but natural supply/demand will play a part as well. Nonetheless, whatever the reason is, once oil creeps above $80-$90 a barrel, Congress will officially begin its oil company witch hunt again.

Of all the dumb populist measures, the windfall profits tax is the most easy one to pass. Take money away from evil oil companies, invest it in happy renewable energy and tax cuts for the middle class, of course it will pass! I can just see Obama saying “The stock price of XYZ Oil has doubled in the past month…yet the unemployment rate is about 10% It’s time XYZ Oil gives back some of its profits and invests in the future of our country.”

At first, the tax won’t have much effect, since whatever the firms are producing, they’ll continue to produce. Windfall profits taxes don’t so much affect current production but discourage investment. The tax will pretty much kill any investment in the US in fossil fuels, whether its oil or natural gas, so we’ll have less domestic supply, higher energy prices, and become more reliant on foreign countries.

More foreign imports, less domestic production, more of a trade deficit, less domestic jobs, more money printing to take care of that, more inflation, and before we know it, gas at the pump is $8/gallon, gold is $2000 an ounce or more, and life is just miserable. The stagflation scenario that the gold bug uber bears talk about comes into effect through an energy crisis, much like our financial crisis began as a subprime issue. I expect Peter Schiff will begin his worldwide “I told you so” tour sometime in early 2011.

On that note, have a nice weekend everyone!

Print this article with comments

This article has 26 comments:

  •  
    We will look at 150$/bbl with nostalgia! it will break above the 200 mark with all the inflation Ben bernanke is creating right now!
    Mar 27 06:03 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Agree... it is unavoidable... and a tax grab will just make it worse in the long term.
    Mar 27 08:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    crude oil @ 54/gallon is a pretty stiff price.
    > jack
    Mar 27 08:46 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The windfall profits tax that was passed by the Carter administration back in the 70's wasn't terribly popular either and it DID squelch exploration and investment. However, the rhetoric is good and Cohen is right -- with the current fever of wealth redistribution, the argument for the WFP tax may win the day. There is a finite amount of oil and as we use it up, it's going to become more costly, especially if there's no exploration going on, that's just basic economics. The answer is simple -- pay more, or do without. A WFP tax isn't going to fix it.
    Mar 27 09:12 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oil producers would love it if oil were priced as given in the second sentence of this article. $54 per gallon oil would bring $2268 per barrel. That is almost as much as 3 ounces of gold! This is a really serious mistake for the author to make. After that it is hard to believe anything he writes because it is clear he never reads or proofs his own articles!
    Mar 27 09:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The oil industry is very cyclical and we are in a down cycle. It will recover quickly and as you said the democratically controlled congress will jump on those obscene profits. Tax and spend is all they know. Putting money into alternative energy is like making a silk purse out of a sows ear. It won't work to the extent that we will need it. Alternative energy is a sows ear.
    Mar 27 09:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Once again the pendelum swings too far. $145/bbl last summer. $33/bbl this winter. $54/bbl now... Are we really shocked by this movement?

    Kind of like housing. Overhot, now undershooting. Don't tell me $50/sq ft for a nice home isn't the bottom. You can't even build the same house for that.

    Everything goes back to the normal trend line eventually...
    Mar 27 10:33 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It Definitely could. The recent 69% leap in crude prices from $32 to $54 may mean that the next spike has already begun. We have been sowing the seeds for the last nine months. The US drilling rig counts has dropped by half to 1000, and it could go as low as 900. Credit squeezed companies have chopped exploration budgets to the bone. The few new wells that are being drilled are becoming increasingly expensive to bring on line. Mexico is the second largest foreign supplier of crude to the US, delivering 1.2 million barrels a day. But production at its main Cantarell field in offshore Yucatan is falling off a cliff, and the country will soon become a net importer. Buy that Prius while the lots are still full.

    Mar 27 11:33 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Worth noting is that even with oil at $145 per barrel and nat gas at $13 MMbtu last summer, energy companies were not developing leases. Stats I saw from last June showed only about 1/4 of leases on shore (primarily in the West) and off shore were being developed. I think all the "drill, baby, drill" last election was just a bunch of hype. I agree that the long term trend in prices is up and up. But I would be very hesitant to want a lot of additional leasing until the companies develop what they already have; something like 68 million acres worth.
    Mar 27 12:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree in most part with your article; the timelines are harder to predict and may be pushed out a bit more. The premise of the neo-socialist windfall profits witch hunt is dead on. That's why I'm more bullish on StatoilHydro than CVX, XOM et. al.- Statoil is majority-owned by the Norwegian gov't already, and they might be socialists, but they won't kill their golden goose like us Americans. They've also already recapitalized to conform with the idiotic carbon cap and trade nonsense. Not just that, but pumping CO2 into old wells has actually resulted in better documented yields due to the pressurization.
    Never thought I'd like European producers more than American- but our "new world order" of Marxism seasoned with unprecedented deficit spending and debt monetization would even prohibit us from entering the EU.
    Mar 27 01:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Demand destruction was obvious in the spring of 2008 - when the price of oil was being driven largely by speculation, rather than fundamentals, and many of those speculators were then trumpeting the imminence of $200 oil. Oil & gas price spikes in the current environment will both undercut economic recovery and feed back into further demand destruction. No commodity price can be sustained for any length of time if its price runs significantly ahead of demand. That applies also to oil. The larger OPEC members understand this, and would prefer a comfortable equilibrium to be achieved - where oil is affordable (so it dampens down enthusiasm for development of more expensive alternative energy sources), but for them profitable. The Saudis have set a target of $70 - $75 oil (although for them, $50 oil is probably fine). In the summer of 2008, as oil headed to $140+/bbl, the Saudis noted that if anyone had needed more oil, they still could supply it - but no one actually wanted it.

    The longer term problem is made more complex by the curtailment of investment in oil infrastructure. The cuts in exploration and development budgets have been legion. That does potentially set the stage for price shocks down the road: but only after OPEC's excess production capacity is absorbed. How long that takes will depend a lot on the macro economic environment and I leave that to others to guess at. In the meantime, I expect oil prices will be highly volatile; I wouldn't be counting on prices north of $100 anytime soon (unless the US dollar collapses - in which case, again, the price increase will feed into demand destruction in the largest oil consuming nation).

    As a long term investment, well capitalized oil producers and the major integrated companies are likely a safe bet. Smaller exploration and development companies, in this environment (where access to capital is difficult and the ability to survive the price volatility - see the example of Oilexco (TSE listed)). Some articles published on Seeking Alpha have suggested that, as a hedge against the possible (likely?) devaluation of the US dollar, US investors look to acquire inter-listed Canadian (or other foreign) oil companies. An interesting angle - playing for higher oil prices, plus something of a currency hedge.

    (Long CNQ, some Canroys, Talisman).
    Mar 27 01:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A weakening dollar will push up the oil price, and the dollar will weaken, that's for sure. I think lack of demand will keep the price down, but I see between $60 - $70 by the middle of summer, especially as we will be using more gasoline then.
    Mar 27 02:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sorry, an incomplete sentence in my last paragraph (see the part in all caps).

    As a long term investment, well capitalized oil producers and the major integrated companies are likely a safe bet. Smaller exploration and development companies, in this environment (where access to capital is difficult and the ability to survive the price volatility - see the example of Oilexco (TSE listed)) ARE A RISKY BET. Some articles published on Seeking Alpha have suggested that, as a hedge against the possible (likely?) devaluation of the US dollar, US investors look to acquire inter-listed Canadian (or other foreign) oil companies. An interesting angle - playing for higher oil prices, plus something of a currency hedge.
    Mar 27 02:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Somehow, that picture of you does not inspire confidence.
    Mar 28 12:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oil along with all commodities will rise! Check out capitalisthero.com and read my original articles on how to survive and thrive is the post- econolyptic world.
    Mar 28 06:48 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Don't worry, they will soon change their tune when they wake up to the fact they have been passed off a lot of worthless IOUs.

    It won't be long before empty Oil Tankers are being pirated for their cargo's of Gold Bullion.


    On Mar 27 01:04 PM Ferdinand E. Banks wrote:

    > Hi Michael. Here it is on a friday in Uppsala, and after a day of
    > telling doctoral students that I am the best economics teacher in
    > the world - which may or may not be true - I feel it my duty to inform
    > you that I am the leading academic energy economist in the world,
    > which is very definitely the case.
    >
    > About this $100/b figure that you want us to accept. I say forget
    > about it...for the time being that is. Despite what you have or will
    > hear about low oil prices from those groovy folks at OPEC's headquarters
    > in Vienna, I think that they are pretty satisfied with the way things
    > are going, although if the dollar crashes they might lose their cool.
    >
    >
    > "Congress will officially begin its oil company witch hunt again",
    > you say. AGAIN you say. Well mercy me. I encounter people from Big
    > Oil at the conferences now and then. Except for the fact that their
    > knowledge of Econ 101 is deficient - to put it mildly - they also
    > seem pretty satisfied damned satisfied.Unless I am mistaken they
    > and their OPEC colleagues will remain that way for a long time..
    Mar 28 03:57 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Though the falling dollar and inflation would suggest higher prices, I do not see oil increasing that much more and may even fall significantly by the end of the year. Does anyone remember what happened in 1998 after the Asian financial crisis? Tankers were full of oil with no one to sell it to. Oil dropped to $12 a barrel.

    We are in a world wide financial crisis now. A similar situation has been unfolding despite the recent increase in prices. Production exceeds consumption. No matter how debased the dollar is, oil can't rise very much in a market with a lot of excess capacity. I think the current run up in oil prices is not sustainable. Oil in the middle eastern countries costs less than $5 a barrel to produce. Even at $12 a barrel, they would still make a profit.

    Though I don't think it will go that low this time, I think we'll see $30 a barrel before we see $150 again. The only disclaimer I'll add to my prediction is that it assumes no supply disruption occurs. If Israel nukes Iran, then $300 a barrel would be my guess.
    Mar 28 06:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If you're thinking about using oil as an inflation hedge, here's what's gonna happen: price controls & speculators tax. I bet they'll do it. On the other hand, our nanny (the government) would like to see oil rise (more tax revenue), but not $150 a barrel.
    Mar 29 10:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    with so many agreeing with this article's author i will probably take a contrarian view...oil's range 09...35$ to70$ at most!!
    Mar 29 01:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    if the fed keeps printing money 24/7 and it becomes devalued they will lose their cool? guess what, there gonna lose their cool. gas is already over 2.25 in the chicago burbs, and the city is always 25 -40 cents more. and its only april. oil prices will rise, so the price at the pump can reflect that, but the real reason why they are going to go up more worldwide is for the TAXES for state local and fed coffers, or otherwise how is obama gonna balance the budget by 2012 as he has claimed to do.i hope as a professor, i can only hope that you understand that the bush administration was the biggest speculator of oil. after all, someone has to pay for the mess in Iraq. and that witch hunt.........window dressing for political constituents is all that is. otherwise they wouldn't have a job


    On Mar 28 03:57 PM Dave Wrixon wrote:

    > Don't worry, they will soon change their tune when they wake up to
    > the fact they have been passed off a lot of worthless IOUs.
    >
    > It won't be long before empty Oil Tankers are being pirated for their
    > cargo's of Gold Bullion.
    Mar 29 04:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with Logical man. Oil will not rise much until the Copenhagen Conference later this year and it will be a Producer manipulated increase. Why Copenhagen?,because it is where the worlds enviro politicians are going to formulate a structure where prices of commodities are going to driven up so they too expensive,thus cutting production and decreasing the worlds demand thus saving the planet.
    The reason Oil dropped from 140+ highs was because the market( everyone else) couldn't afford such a rediculous price. It was driven up there by those who have no idea of the costs involved in the myriad processes to which oil is used,not just gasoline.

    Mar 29 06:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Cap N trade tax will have a huge impact on the price of gas at the pump no matter where the price of oil goes.!!! Wait till we are at $4.00 gas with oil still well below the $150.00 mark and see the public shock.

    When we get there remember that tax payers making under 250K will not see ONE DIME of tax increases. HaHaHaHa, Yes he can and yes he will.
    Mar 31 09:19 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It will get there, but not by the summer. More than $19 billion has poured into commodity funds since January 1, $4 billion more than was seen during all of last year. This explains why my beloved copper soared 35%, while gold jumped 9%. Buy hard assets, sell paper ones.
    Mar 31 06:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yeah, check out this guy's website. Would you trust him with your investment dollars?

    Hilarious....


    On Mar 27 10:55 PM MADE IN SOMALIA wrote:

    > If Oil will be 100$ by the summer, you will fly to the moon like
    > baloon.
    > I always enjoy looking at folks, who are long some stocks, lose 50-90%
    > and then write about investing in Palladium futures, leveraged Crude
    > Oil ETF's or Propane OTC trading, when in fact, such guru's even
    > being right, will never make even 1 penny out of it, because they
    > afraid to invest in anything, that is beyond CNBC or MadMarketCramer
    > junk.
    > If you think Oil is 100$, then buy it, don't preach it.
    Apr 01 08:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It will be some day but not this summer, what is happening in the next 4 months to make the price double?
    In the future, yes, the inflation that will come with the trillion dollar stimulus package will see to that.
    Apr 01 09:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I will bet anyone $1000.00 that oil will not go over 60.00 per barrel the rest of the year! Guaranteed.
    The people that run this world want to ruin certain oil rich countries. Most of these countries base their budget on 70.00 per barrel. Right now they are hurting at 50.00.
    Send me a bet
    Apr 02 03:53 PM | Link | Reply